Etoile
Mod, 2003-2015
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2000
- Posts
- 17,049
That's sweet, thank you.Snowballz said:Im sure your still very cute even with your extra 20 pounds![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's sweet, thank you.Snowballz said:Im sure your still very cute even with your extra 20 pounds![]()
I'm not familiar with Gallery, but I do know Hustler. I don't know how I would have felt if it had been Hustler. There's a much greater fame aspect there because Hustler has a bigger audience, but it's not sex-positive and women-positive like On Our Backs is. I think I'd have done it for Hustler, though.Blindinthedark said:Would you have felt differently if it were Hustler or Gallery or something a little less tasteful? Or does that matter?
Thank you! I think they did come out very well in B/W; I'm pretty sure she was using B/W film so they've never been in color. I think B/W hides more blemishes than color, too! (OOB uses it because they can't afford to produce a full-color mag, afaik, not for the art aspect.)Wickid Cherry Pie said:I've just looked at your photos, Etoile, and they are really beautiful. It's no wonder that you are proud of them.![]()
Maybe I only like them because they are in B&W.![]()
On another note, I think that some of us are just narcissists rather than exhibitionists. We feed on the attention that others will dole out on us, and if it means showing some skin, then, so be it!
It's interesting that you would pose for Hustler. I thought that you would be against it considering Hustlers treatment of women (as you said). Shows what I know.Etoile said:I'm not familiar with Gallery, but I do know Hustler. I don't know how I would have felt if it had been Hustler. There's a much greater fame aspect there because Hustler has a bigger audience, but it's not sex-positive and women-positive like On Our Backs is. I think I'd have done it for Hustler, though.
Hustler definitely degrades women, but I can see myself posing in it as a springboard to something else.Blindinthedark said:It's interesting that you would pose for Hustler. I thought that you would be against it considering Hustlers treatment of women (as you said). Shows what I know.
Is there anything that you wouldn't pose for? (I ask because your the only person who has experience in something other than an amateur interest).
What's the line that you wouldn't cross because then it would be pornographic and not something you would want to be apart of?
PS
I'm on the bandwagon. Your pics are super!

Thank you for the answer.Etoile said:Hustler definitely degrades women, but I can see myself posing in it as a springboard to something else.
What wouldn't I pose for? I'm not sure. I wouldn't mind kink scenes, foot photos, etc. I know people are jerking off to my pictures, and I don't have to watch so I don't really care. I think I wasn't clear about what I would and wouldn't want to be part of, though - you seemed to think that I wouldn't want to be a part of pornography. I would love to! I've done it before and I'd do it again. Even the OOB pictures are objectification and pornographic. They're not "pink" spreads, but I'd probably be willing to do that too. My main concern is knowing the target audience, I guess. If it's for a national magazine or a website I would have no problems with it. If there's a chance that it's just for the photographer's own wanking, then I wouldn't be interested.
And thank you for the compliment on the pictures. Like I said, it's great to hear positive reactions to them.![]()
Etoile said:Hustler definitely degrades women, but I can see myself posing in it as a springboard to something else.
What wouldn't I pose for? I'm not sure. I wouldn't mind kink scenes, foot photos, etc. I know people are jerking off to my pictures, and I don't have to watch so I don't really care. I think I wasn't clear about what I would and wouldn't want to be part of, though - you seemed to think that I wouldn't want to be a part of pornography. I would love to! I've done it before and I'd do it again. Even the OOB pictures are objectification and pornographic. They're not "pink" spreads, but I'd probably be willing to do that too. My main concern is knowing the target audience, I guess. If it's for a national magazine or a website I would have no problems with it. If there's a chance that it's just for the photographer's own wanking, then I wouldn't be interested.
And thank you for the compliment on the pictures. Like I said, it's great to hear positive reactions to them.![]()
Etoile said:I'm not familiar with Gallery, but I do know Hustler. I don't know how I would have felt if it had been Hustler. There's a much greater fame aspect there because Hustler has a bigger audience, but it's not sex-positive and women-positive like On Our Backs is. I think I'd have done it for Hustler, though.
Ah, so Gallery is somewhere between Playboy and Hustler on the porn mag spectrum?Lust Engine said:Gallery is by far MUCH tamer than Hustler.
But now & then Larry Flynt also takes some pretty sharp witted barbs at what he considers society's hypocrisy every now & then.
Etoile said:Ah, so Gallery is somewhere between Playboy and Hustler on the porn mag spectrum?
Lust Engine said:In my never to be humble opinion I think so... or at least it was last time I checked out an issue a few years back. I remember the biggest thing they had going was "The Girl Next Door"- a huge thing about getting amateurs into the magazine.
Some of entries were actually quite attractive, but it did seem to be a niche magazine. They still scattered a few professional model types in there along with an obligatory letters column.
James G 5 said:Hustler has the Am section too, but calling it "Beaver Hunt" just lowers the class level drastically![]()
Lust Engine said:But I was always surprised by just how many entries they got every month too.

Actually, there are some websites around that make this easier. The issue of On Our Backs that I got yesterday includes the following review:James G 5 said:Lots of people want attention![]()
That was the first I'd heard of this site, but I've considered joining SuicideGirls.com too.Thatstrangegirl.com
Thatstrangegirl is a female-owned and -operated amateur alternaporn site. Alternaporn is the Internet's latest craze that lets any punk rocker armed with a digital camera and DIY spunk become a bona fide porn mogul. But this one is different. There is a strong sense of beautiful, awkward reality among the boys and girls at Thatstrangegirl, and it doesn't give you a sneaking suspicion that you're ogling cookie cutter porn types who've been shoehorned into Hot Topic outfits. These models are the real deal: nerds, geeks, and punks with imperfect bodies who are willing to bare it all in the name of pornographic inquiry.
Etoile said:Actually, there are some websites around that make this easier. The issue of On Our Backs that I got yesterday includes the following review:
That was the first I'd heard of this site, but I've considered joining SuicideGirls.com too.

Etoile said:Actually, there are some websites around that make this easier. The issue of On Our Backs that I got yesterday includes the following review:
That was the first I'd heard of this site, but I've considered joining SuicideGirls.com too.
Lust Engine said:I say go for it...it sounds very upbeat!![]()

James G 5 said:Just share the links with us if you do it
We can look & pretend you like boys![]()
Lust Engine said:Etoile likes boys... but in her own special way that's all.![]()

James G 5 said:True enough
which way IS that exactly? On toast?
That is giving me a mental picture of a woman spreading her legs while in a seated position. Nice visual, LE, thanks!Lust Engine said:I've learned never to question a lady on her taste. I just sit back & enjoy it all unfolding before me.![]()

Etoile said:That is giving me a mental picture of a woman spreading her legs while in a seated position. Nice visual, LE, thanks!![]()