BOSTONFICTIONWRITER
The Wizard Of Literotica
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2007
- Posts
- 3,037
Auto-Jac
Well, Bakeboss, did it again, made a farse of Literotica's Survivor Contest.
I ask you, when will you put a stop to her writing Non-erotic and Review and Essay stories and classifying them as something they aren't, sexual stories?
Once, again, there was no sex in this story, either, that is, if we go by Moderator Lauren's definition of a story needing to have a lot of graphic and explicit sex for it to post within a contest category, other than non-erotic and review and essay.
Why is this one writer allowed to post her non-erotic and review and essay stories, stories that do not contain any sexual context, in any category she deems without the written complaint and abuse that I received when trying to honestly play the game?
I dare you to read her stories and tell me that they all belong in the categories that she has been posting them to fit.
C'mon, are you kidding me? This is crazy. This is blatant. Listen, I don't care a rat's ass about me. As the official Survivor Watch Dog, (lol), my concern is for the other contestants who write stories in hopes of competing. They don't have a chance if one writer is allowed to skirt the rules that you moderators have already established when I played the game in 2007 and 2008.
Now, I reread those rules over and again and guess what, there is no rule written that reads that Bakeboss is allowed to post her non-erotic and review and essay story in any category that she wants. Go figure. Yet, she's allowed to do just that without recourse, especially after I've brought my charges to light of everyone playing this game. Weird, huh, and telling, for that matter?
Admittedly, it was a great story. I never read a 1005 word story that was so engaging, since I read the article in Reader's Digest about Hemmoroid creme. Amazing. Funny how two stories so different, could be about the same subject.
Answer me this. Do you remember PrincessErin writing to you about last year's Survivor Contest and complaining that there were some writers writing stories that she felt were chapter stories? Do you remember that?
Yeah, I know, you jumped all over that one, didn't you? You started disqualifying everyone's story, but for Bakeboss's stories. I remember that. Bakeboss gradually moved up the ladder. Now, here she is again, trying to slither by to win the contest by writing non-erotic and review and essay stories and calling them stories that have sexual content.
I don't know, call me crazy, but I have a funny feeling that PrincessErin is Bakeboss. That certainly would explain how she was allowed to win the 2008 Survivor contest over me. I had one hand tied behind my back, while competing. Not only did I have to compete against PrincessErin, but I had to compete against the moderators, who didn't want me to win under any circumstance.
Nothing has changed with this unfairly run contest. Why suddenly, do you not do anything about Bakeboss's obvious cheating, when you were so aggressive to change the results of last year's contest, at the eleventh hour, I might add, by "arbitrarily" (that's an appropriate word) disqualifying everyone's stories? How was that a fair contest?
I think we need an investigation. I have a feeling the moderators are accepting bribes and kickbacks (lol). Maybe Crimson gets free panties (lol).
Is this what will happen? On January 2, 2011, will you go into Bakeboss's scorecard and disqualify most of her stories for not fitting the categories she posted them in? Is that it? Are you waiting for the last possible minute to show everyone that this is a fair contest? Or because of what I've uncovered, are you just in a quandry of what the Hell to do to still make Bakeboss the winner?
Why can't we just have a fair contest? Why must there be rules for one and not for all? I don't understand. Hey, I'm just trying to get some ground rules established for when I throw my hat in the ring in October.
So, by not disqualifying Bakeboss's stories are you implying, by your silence, that, now, since I haven't competed, that any story, even non-erotic and review and essay stories, are now acceptable to post in any category that the writer wants? If I tried doing that, all my stories would be dumped in the non-erotic and review and essay categories, as they were in 2007 and 2008?
Which is it? You can't have it both ways? Either you have rules or you don't have rules?
Tell you what, why don't you just post Bakeboss's rules, along with the official Suvivor rules, so that the rest of us will know what we must do to compete with one writer who is allowed by the moderators to skirt the rules to her benefit. Definitely that would have helped me to play the game, when I competed.
Just as an aside, not that it makes any difference, but do you realize that my thread posts are nearly as long as Bakeboss's stories? Defiinitely, they are more interesting to read, that's for sure. Wow.
Well, Bakeboss, did it again, made a farse of Literotica's Survivor Contest.
I ask you, when will you put a stop to her writing Non-erotic and Review and Essay stories and classifying them as something they aren't, sexual stories?
Once, again, there was no sex in this story, either, that is, if we go by Moderator Lauren's definition of a story needing to have a lot of graphic and explicit sex for it to post within a contest category, other than non-erotic and review and essay.
Why is this one writer allowed to post her non-erotic and review and essay stories, stories that do not contain any sexual context, in any category she deems without the written complaint and abuse that I received when trying to honestly play the game?
I dare you to read her stories and tell me that they all belong in the categories that she has been posting them to fit.
C'mon, are you kidding me? This is crazy. This is blatant. Listen, I don't care a rat's ass about me. As the official Survivor Watch Dog, (lol), my concern is for the other contestants who write stories in hopes of competing. They don't have a chance if one writer is allowed to skirt the rules that you moderators have already established when I played the game in 2007 and 2008.
Now, I reread those rules over and again and guess what, there is no rule written that reads that Bakeboss is allowed to post her non-erotic and review and essay story in any category that she wants. Go figure. Yet, she's allowed to do just that without recourse, especially after I've brought my charges to light of everyone playing this game. Weird, huh, and telling, for that matter?
Admittedly, it was a great story. I never read a 1005 word story that was so engaging, since I read the article in Reader's Digest about Hemmoroid creme. Amazing. Funny how two stories so different, could be about the same subject.
Answer me this. Do you remember PrincessErin writing to you about last year's Survivor Contest and complaining that there were some writers writing stories that she felt were chapter stories? Do you remember that?
Yeah, I know, you jumped all over that one, didn't you? You started disqualifying everyone's story, but for Bakeboss's stories. I remember that. Bakeboss gradually moved up the ladder. Now, here she is again, trying to slither by to win the contest by writing non-erotic and review and essay stories and calling them stories that have sexual content.
I don't know, call me crazy, but I have a funny feeling that PrincessErin is Bakeboss. That certainly would explain how she was allowed to win the 2008 Survivor contest over me. I had one hand tied behind my back, while competing. Not only did I have to compete against PrincessErin, but I had to compete against the moderators, who didn't want me to win under any circumstance.
Nothing has changed with this unfairly run contest. Why suddenly, do you not do anything about Bakeboss's obvious cheating, when you were so aggressive to change the results of last year's contest, at the eleventh hour, I might add, by "arbitrarily" (that's an appropriate word) disqualifying everyone's stories? How was that a fair contest?
I think we need an investigation. I have a feeling the moderators are accepting bribes and kickbacks (lol). Maybe Crimson gets free panties (lol).
Is this what will happen? On January 2, 2011, will you go into Bakeboss's scorecard and disqualify most of her stories for not fitting the categories she posted them in? Is that it? Are you waiting for the last possible minute to show everyone that this is a fair contest? Or because of what I've uncovered, are you just in a quandry of what the Hell to do to still make Bakeboss the winner?
Why can't we just have a fair contest? Why must there be rules for one and not for all? I don't understand. Hey, I'm just trying to get some ground rules established for when I throw my hat in the ring in October.
So, by not disqualifying Bakeboss's stories are you implying, by your silence, that, now, since I haven't competed, that any story, even non-erotic and review and essay stories, are now acceptable to post in any category that the writer wants? If I tried doing that, all my stories would be dumped in the non-erotic and review and essay categories, as they were in 2007 and 2008?
Which is it? You can't have it both ways? Either you have rules or you don't have rules?
Tell you what, why don't you just post Bakeboss's rules, along with the official Suvivor rules, so that the rest of us will know what we must do to compete with one writer who is allowed by the moderators to skirt the rules to her benefit. Definitely that would have helped me to play the game, when I competed.
Just as an aside, not that it makes any difference, but do you realize that my thread posts are nearly as long as Bakeboss's stories? Defiinitely, they are more interesting to read, that's for sure. Wow.