Ya know, many lit posters make grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, typos and a whole host of other inaccuracies. Some purposely bastardize the English language to be cute thinking it’s clever.
There are times when autocorrect, predictive text can change the original intent of a narrative and overlooked simply because of screen size of the particular device people use. E.G. I had to enter *screen* three times before it typed my intended word, the word *people* manifested itself as peo, peoples which I had to correct. And sometimes typing too fast lends itself to incorrect wording. ” I could care less” is often used as slang but since you found it necessary to point out it’s grammatically incorrect I stand corrected *couldn’t* is the correct wording. You should take great pride in your role as lit’s premier grammar nazis. Maybe even report me to JaFo for incorrect wording.
My point is, when I read someone’s text I overlook grammatical or spelling errors accepting the fact that to error is human. Unlike you and 77 I prefer to read beyond simple grammatical errors comprehending the spirit of their narrative and reason though their point of view.
You’re petty.
As far as Hollywood elites and their ideology there’s enough out there. I’m sure if you try you could find out for yourself how extremely left they are.
This a small point but you might be correct, if in fact you did care less but could, upon reflection, care even less.
You two make such a nice couple...bit of advice though ican't, don't give in for a couple cans of corn. Demand a case as a minimum.I also reached that conclusion. Didn’t want to spend another second on that petty asshole explaining another alternative meaning to *I could care less* which could be interpreted as the option to care less.