Better Writing Through Chemistry?

[gauchecritic]

Re: for The Earl

TE: This does not seem the place for it and does seem an appropriate time to bring up that dread notion re. your youth.

Very cordially, Pear

aaaaaaaAAAAAAAHHHHHHHhhhhhhhh.

Don't blame me, I didn't bake it. (God as played by alan freeman.)

Gauche

 

[Guest]

ahem

This is a test.

This is a test of the posting relevancy to thread topics system.

If this were a real posting relevant to the thread topic it would have to do with writing/creating under the influence of various chemicals, whether external (nitrous oxide, alcohol, caffeine) or internal (endorphins, adrenelin).

b

 

[TheEarl]

My previous post was badly worded. Let's try again:

I'd say Shakespeare was genius, but that's because I've read him. There are a lot of people who would say that Shakespeare is a genius simply because they know that's what they're meant to say. His fame as a genius is what brings him his fame as a genius if you see what I mean.

Same with the Mona Lisa (I know nothing about art, so this is safer teritory for this argument). Most famous painting in the world is the Mona Lisa. Why is it famous? Because everyone goes to see the most famous painting in the world.

Gone now.

The Earl

 

[Guest]

Nevermind, not worth pursuing.