I agree, and it's very hard to argue with a 9-0 decision. For all the yammering about "states rights", it is the job of the US Congress to apply the criteria for the 14th amendment for federal elections.
The legal question has deserved a challenge which is what has happened here.Those corrupt right wingers Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson are obviously in the tank for Trump.
I was being facetious. It absolutely deserved the challenge and the unanimous vote validates the courtās commitment to putting the rule of law above partisan politics.
those judges are in their position because of partisan politics, dumbass.
In this circumstance yes. Congress being divided these days to the point of disfunction, will mean that the courts will continue to be challenged to fill in gaps.
Your childish impulse to engage in silly name calling apparently impeded your reading comprehension. My comment is about how they approached the decision, not how they were placed in their positions.
Lol
9-0
ha! one can't happen without the other, dumbass.
More infantile name calling. Lol
Dam Ginsberg for kicking the bucket!!!Those corrupt right wingers Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson are obviously in the tank for Trump.
he's weak is what he is. he has zero conviction or purpose behind his posts. it's all party line stuff because being an individual is hard.
yet i'm not wrong.
show us someone who said that trump should be legally held from the ballot.
It's not the only thing absurd about US politics - the Electoral College for one, Gerry-mandering, uncontrolled lobbying, etc.
carbon boi getting froggy
. keep deflecting tho. you're gloating about something that no one here took the position of.
It takes a real idiot to misspell idiot or did you try to spell eejits and misspelled that too?
it's really not that victory. at all. no one was counting on the traitor not being on the ballot but he has so little to get excited about in his pathetic life.
