For those who assume supporting a Trump presidency over a Biden one means being a MAGA Trumper....

[Rightguide]

I don't disagree with your overall conclusion. I do disagree with you on the 1st 3 points. But we can agree to disagree. Without insulting each other. Because we can talk like adults.

I will address 2 of those since you know where I stand on the abortion issue. 1. Tariffs ALWAYS come back to bite the consumer. The companies NEVER pay for a higher tax. The consumer does. Just because it is standard procedure doesn't make it a good idea, and it can undercut Trump's efforts in other fronts. 3. Biden FUNDED Israel, but that's the extent of his support. His admin has supported anti-Israel forces indirectly with words, political pressure, and even financially through indirect means.

Three points on tariffs:

It's more correct to say tariffs are a tax on importers who may not import the commodity because of the high tariff. Such a tariff could encourage domestic production which in the end could mean more jobs and better production technology and lower prices. Many products originating overseas are produced with slave labor. A tariff might be employed for moral reasons as well.

Importers for various economic reasons may not pass the costs of tariffs onto the consumer in some scenarios. They could be absorbed to protect market share for instance. Tariffs can also be a useful long term tool from a policy perspective, they can be useful in achieving long-term goals like reducing trade imbalances, protecting domestic industries, or negotiating better trade deals. While short-term price increases may occur, the longer-term benefits of these goals could outweigh the immediate cost to consumers if they are passed along.

Trump has also proposed, yesterday in fact at the NYSE, that he will lower taxes on industry to 15% if they build their products in the US.

One point on Israel funding. Many in the upper levels of the Biden administration went kicking and screaming into funding Israel's war effort. Yes they went along but they dragged their feet all the way.

 

[Rightguide]

You cannot possibly have read all of what was said as quickly as that. SO what you just posted is knee-jerk reaction. Exactly the opposite of nuanced thought and debate. Unless your intention was to prove my point, you may want to actually read what others have to say, consider it, and give a full, well-thought-out, multi=sentence response. Thank you for your input, though. I appreciate it.

If you oppose his worldview, he doesn't care what you think.

 

[Politruk]

Dude! EVERY MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL who was speaking out against an untested vac was getting non personed. Flu deaths and cases were being called covid. People with Covid were dying of cancer or gunshot wounds and being called Covid deaths. The Evil Dr. who hasn't practiced medicine in decades was making BANK off the MAIN VAC HE WAS PUSHING. The side effects have injured, permanently damaged, and even killed people. When MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS WHO HAD BEEN RECOGNIZED AS THE PEOPLE TO GO TO IN THE FIELDS OF VACCINATIONS AND BACTERIA dared to warn against using the vac, they were muted on all platforms, and when their predictions came true, their predictions were eliminated on those platforms and the reasons for the very things they predicted explained away. This whole Covid Vac thing has been NOTHING BUT ONE LONG, CORRUPT, CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

All lies.

 

[Rightguide]

Try doing a search on conservative topics, be it videos we both know were released or any other information from a conservative point of view. Give it clear indicators as to what you are looking for. The information Google has deemed "nonfactual", based on the liberal views of those in the tech world (most of them are HARD left), get buried or removed. I know. I have experienced it. I have viewed the vids, read the documents, and seen and read the full statements, then days, even hours later, they ceased to exist on the searches. But, hey, you keep believing what you want. The rest of us, the sane ones who don't worship government, we are awake, truly "woke" if you will, and as such are sick of uninformed Borg like you. That's why your side just got trounced. Or should we go to the maps again?

Try these search engines:

https://resulthunter.com/

https://searchtheright.com/

 

[jomar]

Dude! EVERY MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL who was speaking out against an untested vac was getting non personed. Flu deaths and cases were being called covid. People with Covid were dying of cancer or gunshot wounds and being called Covid deaths. The Evil Dr. who hasn't practiced medicine in decades was making BANK off the MAIN VAC HE WAS PUSHING. The side effects have injured, permanently damaged, and even killed people. When MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS WHO HAD BEEN RECOGNIZED AS THE PEOPLE TO GO TO IN THE FIELDS OF VACCINATIONS AND BACTERIA dared to warn against using the vac, they were muted on all platforms, and when their predictions came true, their predictions were eliminated on those platforms and the reasons for the very things they predicted explained away. This whole Covid Vac thing has been NOTHING BUT ONE LONG, CORRUPT, CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

Everyone loves a good conspiracy theory!

Three points on tariffs:

It's more correct to say tariffs are a tax on importers who may not import the commodity because of the high tariff. Such a tariff could encourage domestic production which in the end could mean more jobs and better production technology and lower prices.

Let’s say it does. Ramping up factories and supply chains doesn’t happen overnight. Meanwhile, higher prices for you and me. Also, domestically made products are likely to cost more. Maybe consumers will adjust to that framework.

Many products originating overseas are produced with slave labor. A tariff might be employed for moral reasons as well.

Could be, but do we really care about that when we’re ok with children being shot at least weekly in public schools?

Importers for various economic reasons may not pass the costs of tariffs onto the consumer in some scenarios. They could be absorbed to protect market share for instance. Tariffs can also be a useful long term tool from a policy perspective, they can be useful in achieving long-term goals like reducing trade imbalances, protecting domestic industries, or negotiating better trade deals. While short-term price increases may occur, the longer-term benefits of these goals could outweigh the immediate cost to consumers if they are passed along.

Tariffs, if used judiciously and targeted can be a useful tool in the toolbox. But that’s not what Trump is proposing. I’m not aware of any but one trump supporting economist who think blanket tariffs are a good idea. He views tariffs from the wrong end of the lens.

Trump has also proposed, yesterday in fact at the NYSE, that he will lower taxes on industry to 15% if they build their products in the US.

See above on buildouts.

One point on Israel funding. Many in the upper levels of the Biden administration went kicking and screaming into funding Israel's war effort. Yes they went along but they dragged their feet all the way.

Cite? But even so, what are they going to do, toss out the decades old alliance and support overnight? Different amounts and measures are up for discussion, but still.

 

[Politruk]

It's more correct to say tariffs are a tax on importers who may not import the commodity because of the high tariff. Such a tariff could encourage domestic production which in the end could mean more jobs and better production technology and lower prices.

Why would that work any better now than it did in 1930?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Information sources that y'all don't have the BALLS to look at and study out by independent research that isn't named Google or Bing.

So imaginary things. Thanks. Cus I have the balls to look at and study anything BUT I'm not huge on "independent" since it tends to mean there is no source, nothing you can reference.