.. get more moderators?

[Quoll]

No because what you did didn't make sense.

Imparticular, who was I offending, who was I disrupting?

Also, you blanks don't even correlate, so no, I actually want something that makes sense, which is not what you posted.

I personally find this post somewhat offensive and distasteful, should I now report this to the moderator to have it removed?
Also you spelt a word incorrectly, something else that also annoys me, another reason for having it removed.




Yes this is another example.

 

[DrDav]

Because you can't see that some people like it this way. That's fine. You want me to be just like you. I'm not. I disagree.

You also have the option to block or ignore all these people and yet you won't do it because they shouldn't exist and they're a personal insult to you even if it's got nothing to do with you.

This is a lot of issues encapsulated. Reminds me of people against gay marriage. It's an affront to marriage! Dude, they're not making you marry a gay person. They're just allowing other people the option.

Deal.

Bad analogy, I think a better analogy to the lack of self-control and/or moderation on parts of lit is more like legalising slander or public brawls, rather than gay marriage. I.e. We all know the problems with slander and public brawls, where as the gay marriage issue is highly subjective and isn't actually hurting anyone.

 

[DrDav]

I personally find this post somewhat offensive and distasteful, should I now report this to the moderator to have it removed?
Also you spelt a word incorrectly, something else that also annoys me, another reason for having it removed.




Yes this is another example.

The only argument you have left is to belittle the subject? I thought you were trying to convince me of the error of my ways

 

[Recidiva]

Bad analogy, I think a better analogy to the lack of self-control and/or moderation on parts of lit is more like legalising slander or public brawls, rather than gay marriage. I.e. We all know the problems with slander and public brawls, where as the gay marriage issue is highly subjective and isn't actually hurting anyone.

This is words, man. It's not assault. You're doing the "slippery slope" argument, which I hate. It's not a slippery slope. It's text.

If you're developing bruises from it, sign off. It's totally consensual.

 

[Guest]

 

[DrDav]

This is quickly becoming a waste of my time. I hate narrowminded fuckers.

The feeling is mutual.

 

[DrDav]

This is words, man. It's not assault. You're doing the "slippery slope" argument, which I hate. It's not a slippery slope. It's text.

If you're developing bruises from it, sign off. It's totally consensual.

"Words", tell me, what is slander?

 

[Guest]

 

[DrDav]

Okay if I'm so way out of touch here.

Tell me, how many of you have never reported a "bad post", regardless of whether it was removed or not ?

 

[Recidiva]

"Words", tell me, what is slander?

"words falsely spoken that damage the reputation of another"

Now, if you can tell me exactly what that has to do with a "reputation" on an erotica board, I'd love to hear how it affects anything other than an ego that can't bear being challenged.

 

[Guest]

 

[DrDav]

My last post on this subject, you're all trying so hard to say things are fine as they are. But, think on this...

If I'm so wrong, and you're so right - you can only be so if you have never been offended by a post that had no other clear reason to be there, other than to cause offence.

The answer to this question I think will find many hypocrites.

 

[Quoll]

I don't think I'm alone, so no, it isn't just me.

In this thread it appears you are.

Not my usual style but...



I think what people here are trying to say in a not so blunt way, is if you don't like it, fuck off.


Seeing as how this is a moderated board feel free to report this post and have it removed

 

[Recidiva]

My last post on this subject, you're all trying so hard to say things are fine as they are. But, think on this...

If I'm so wrong, and you're so right - you can only be so if you have never been offended by a post that had no other clear reason to be there, other than to cause offence.

The answer to this question I think will find many hypocrites.

What you're missing is a sense of humor.

Not a rare condition, so don't worry.

 

[DrDav]

What you're missing is a sense of humor.

Not a rare condition, so don't worry.

Okay one more...

That, my dear fellow lit member, is the biggest text book cop out to justify a whole set of negative behaviours, that there ever has been.

0/10 - must do better.

 

[Recidiva]

Okay one more...

That, my dear fellow lit member, is the biggest text book cop out to justify a whole set of negative behaviours, that there ever has been.

0/10 - must do better.

*reports the post as argumentative*

 

[Quoll]

*raises hand*

*points finger* Hypocrite.

I did report one post way back when during the Brinnie wars, but that was for spamming, that shit's really nasty.

 

[silverwhisper]

i'm sorry, but what precisely is the issue at hand now? that the moderation isn't consistent w/ the site's rules, or that the rules are not correct?

ed

 

[Recidiva]

i'm sorry, but what precisely is the issue at hand now? that the moderation isn't consistent w/ the site's rules, or that the rules are not correct?

ed

It's because people shouldn't be disagreeable.

 

[Guest]

 

[Guest]

 

[Quoll]

It's because people shouldn't be disagreeable.

No, you are wrong.

 

[Recidiva]

No, you are wrong.

I'm never wrong. I'm going to create a political party to lobby for the right way to do things. MY way.

 

[Guest]

 

[Recidiva]

We have one. You just need to almost be voted in as president.

The only thing I need is a lack of ethics and a capacity for denial.