Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
i agree with you in principle netz, but i do think that financial matters should have been discussed and sorted out in the initial tpe discussions as it's very important in any relationship.
it is their business and their decision of course, but she was asking for our opinions and i simply gave mine.
we don't do the tpe thing, but our finances are combined. that works for us because we do have the same attitudes and responsibility about money.
i've learned over the years that attitudes about money matters are formed very early in life and really don't change. yes, he's young and may learn from this lesson, but what he may actually learn is that she will be there to bail him out whenever he needs it.
Yeah there's a lot more going into what we think about money than just money - the only things that have ever changed any of my impulses around it are years and therapy. No wonder it's such a battle for a lot of people.
But it does seem to me like finances are assumed to be part and parcel of the negotiated rel. I mean I think they are? I don't get the sense that this was a surprise out of nowhere rather than an abstract theory made concrete. I could also be wrong though.