Kamala just attacked Donald for being weak on the border

[Sean Renaud]

Who are the dirty brown people? What is the root problem?

Can you reasonably trace your background to Europe? Western and ideally northern?

 

[Rightguide]

At her rally in Georgia today, Kamala Harris attacked Donald Trump for being weak on border security. She pointed out that while he was President he did nothing to protect the border, and he recently pressured the Republicans in Congress to reject the bipartisan border bill that would have fixed most of what he complains about.

She did this because she, like all Democrats, is a liar and a known projectionist. Her record is known. She has no credibility with informed people.

 

[DeluxAuto]

She did this because she, like all Democrats, is a liar and a known projectionist. Her record is known. She has no credibility with informed people.

Please refute with facts instead of feelings, Jack.

 

[HisArpy]

Please refute with facts instead of feelings, Jack.

You should be able to count this high if you use your toes, so, see post #20.

 

[RobDownSouth]

You should be able to count this high if you use your toes, so, see post #20.

From post 20:

Or the Remain in Mexico treaty that Biden eliminated on his very first day in office?
...
Basically, you're an idiot. As is everyone else who thinks this thread is based anywhere close to real life.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/biden-administration-ends-trump-era-remain-in-mexico-policy

You want to know who *I* think is an idiot?
A juris doctor, presumably an attorney in good standing with his state bar association, who conflates a previous President's Executive Order as having the same legal standing as a proper congressionally verified TREATY

What a weird conflation!

 

[HisArpy]

From post 20:


You want to know who *I* think is an idiot?
A juris doctor, presumably an attorney in good standing with his state bar association, who conflates a previous President's Executive Order as having the same legal standing as a proper congressionally verified TREATY

What a weird conflation!

Oh my, a slip of the fingers and all that EVIDENCE showing the Left is hyperventilating and LYING AGAIN just disappears like it never was.

Or maybe, just maybe, that instead of acting the maggot you should brush up on what is and isn't a treaty.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/treaty



nb; this is kind of like you not knowing how to address an attorney despite the social rules of such being quite clear and easy to locate.

 

[DeluxAuto]

From post 20:


You want to know who *I* think is an idiot?
A juris doctor, presumably an attorney in good standing with his state bar association, who conflates a previous President's Executive Order as having the same legal standing as a proper congressionally verified TREATY

What a weird conflation!

He's such a spazzy dumbfuck.

 

[HisArpy]

He's such a spazzy dumbfuck.

It's your mom's fault you're a dickhead.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Oh my, a slip of the fingers and all that EVIDENCE showing the Left is hyperventilating and LYING AGAIN just disappears like it never was.

Or maybe, just maybe, that instead of acting the maggot you should brush up on what is and isn't a treaty.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/treaty



nb; this is kind of like you not knowing how to address an attorney despite the social rules of such being quite clear and easy to locate.

Squire, perhaps you could shed some light on the TWO parties who were signatories to this TREATY?
I'll stipulate that one of the parties was, of course, convicted felon DonOld J Trump.
Who, pray tell, was the OTHER signatory? Hmmm?
And refresh my memory, HOW is a TREATY ratified within the United States?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Squire, perhaps you could shed some light on the TWO parties who were signatories to this TREATY?
I'll stipulate that one of the parties was, of course, convicted felon DonOld J Trump.
Who, pray tell, was the OTHER signatory? Hmmm?
And refresh my memory, HOW is a TREATY ratified within the United States?

Derpy *thinks* that because DonOld told him Mexico would pay for the wall, it was a "treaty" between the two parties.

Derpy is a spazzy dumbfuck.

 

[beckiefalwell]

Trump is weak on all borders: Mexico, Ukraine, Palestine, women's vaginas...

 

[HisArpy]

Squire, perhaps you could shed some light on the TWO parties who were signatories to this TREATY?
I'll stipulate that one of the parties was, of course, convicted felon DonOld J Trump.
Who, pray tell, was the OTHER signatory? Hmmm?
And refresh my memory, HOW is a TREATY ratified within the United States?

dudly, Mexico signed onto the agreement. That means "TWO" parties unless you're so stupid you can't count even with using your fingers and toes.

We also have many treaties which haven't ever been ratified. The agreement to defend Ukraine for example is just one of them.

We also have many ratified treaties which we broke at whim.

So where you're going with your little grammar nazi meltdown doesn't seem to be making much sense all things considered.

 

[HisArpy]

Trump is weak on all borders: Mexico, Ukraine, Palestine, women's vaginas...

Yes, yes, this is quite true.

If, that is, you live in fantasyland where the sky is some other color than blue and pigs can fly.

 

[RobDownSouth]

dudly, Mexico signed onto the agreement.

Squire, I can find no evidence that Mexico ever signed off on this purported "treaty". Until you show me otherwise, I'll assume that this is simply a case of you inflating an Executive Order into a formal treaty.

 

[HisArpy]

Squire, I can find no evidence that Mexico ever signed off on this purported "treaty". Until you show me otherwise, I'll assume that this is simply a case of you inflating an Executive Order into a formal treaty.

A Presidential EO has no effect on a foreign nation. That you cannot "find" anything on this only shows that you either didn't look, or didn't like the results so you ignored them.

For instance, the Texas Tribune (which you should be aware of since you're in Houston) said this:

Under President Donald Trump, his administration used MPP much more aggressively, sending nearly 70,000 people back to Mexico after negotiating the program with Mexican authorities and implementing it in late 2018. (emphasis added)

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/0...igrant-protection-protocols-judge-injunction/

Even Wiki says:

After the completion of negotiations with the government of Mexico, the Biden administration announced the resumption of the practice on December 2, 2021, with some alterations. (emphasis added)

Which sort of tells us that the policy between the US and Mexico was negotiated to an official agreement. ie, a "treaty."

So again, if you can't find anything, that's on you because normal people understand how to use google and the internet.

 

[lovecraft68]

The left are the most deluded, brainwashed, willfully ignorant lemmings that have ever existed in the history of this world.

They spent years screaming Trump was keeping kids in cages (Obamas cages) and wouldn't let anyone in and wanted everyone out.

Now they're told he let all the illegals in and they're going "Yeah, Trump let them in!"

There is no brains, nor shame, in this sorry lot.

 

[jaF0]

What was the crossing rate from '17 to '20? What was the trend?

What was the crossing rate from '21 to '24? What was the trend?

 

[ll74]

The left are the most deluded, brainwashed, willfully ignorant lemmings that have ever existed in the history of this world.

Hyperbole is fun

They spent years screaming Trump was keeping kids in cages (Obamas cages) and wouldn't let anyone in and wanted everyone out.

The right spent years screaming about kids in cages when Obama was in office.

Now they're told he let all the illegals in and they're going "Yeah, Trump let them in!"

Asylum law let them in. Laws passed by Congress are the major issue and the Senate bill wouldve improved things quite a bit.

There is no brains, nor shame, in this sorry lot.

Hyperbole is fun

 

[HisArpy]

What was the crossing rate from '17 to '20? What was the trend?

What was the crossing rate from '21 to '24? What was the trend?

Stop, you're confusing them with hard facts and you know the Left doesn't deal with those very well.

 

[RobDownSouth]

A Presidential EO has no effect on a foreign nation. That you cannot "find" anything on this only shows that you either didn't look, or didn't like the results so you ignored them.

For instance, the Texas Tribune (which you should be aware of since you're in Houston) said this:



Even Wiki says:



Which sort of tells us that the policy between the US and Mexico was negotiated to an official agreement. ie, a "treaty."

So again, if you can't find anything, that's on you because normal people understand how to use google and the internet.

You are correct, there was no TREATY (as defined in the Constitution) but there was some sort of agreement with Mexico's government in 2018.

That's my error, I took you at your word when you swore it was a TREATY, and that is what I searched for.

So there was some quasi-official deal between Mexico and the US that President Biden correctly terminated upon the assumption of office.

I'll stipulate to an agreement, but it wasn't a TREATY. Words have meaning.

You have a nice day.

 

[SevMax2]

She should also note trump diverted military funds that would have gone to much needed housing upgrades (e.g., getting rid of mold) and more to build his vanity project.

That actually is a valid criticism, though the counter-argument is that the Wall is good for national security. Not one hundred percent sold on said rebuttal, but that is the answer to that, I would think. Either way, Congress appropriated the money for one purpose and it should not be redirected to another function, especially not at the expense of our troops.

 

[SevMax2]

At her rally in Georgia today, Kamala Harris attacked Donald Trump for being weak on border security. She pointed out that while he was President he did nothing to protect the border, and he recently pressured the Republicans in Congress to reject the bipartisan border bill that would have fixed most of what he complains about.

One could argue that the border wall was intended to be the answer for that, but the fact that he opposed the border bill is a valid critique for sure.

 

[LLCox]

he recently pressured the Republicans in Congress to reject the bipartisan border bill that would have fixed most of what he complains about.

How come she didn't mention that in the debate. The audio ear rings must have not been working.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

How come she didn't mention that in the debate. The audio ear rings must have not been working.

In the debate, Vice President Harris did mention that the Republicans in Congress killed the border bill at Donald Trump’s request. She scolded him for it to his face.

 

[Rightguide]

Harris lied because she knew the BSG's of the world would believe her. It's that simple.