Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
It's a human concept but it's also a 'Higher Reasoning" concept. Hence the 'age of consent' laws. Very young children could give vocal consent to have intercourse with an older person but that doesn't make it right. Informed higher brain functioning choices are what separates good, sane sex from the squick.
I hardly think that animals understand the nature of the risks involved. I mean if you're branded a killer stallion you're going to be shot, even if you did kill some chick who was doing weird things to your bits. A lot of the same people touting this as fine would be the last ones to say that animals being killed for our sport or put down for being animal-like is wrong, but this just opens the likelihood up in a less direct manner. The animal doesn't really get to say to itself "wow, one night with Hank is worth the possibility that I might have to be put down tomorrow, yessir!"
I'm sure when the couple fucking the dog tire of its neurotic ways and dump it onto the Humane Society it's not going to make a good pet for someone else. The more I think about this the more it disgusts me, frankly, it's a perfect example of how we use animals while fetishizing them for their goodness and naturalness, it's total projection of whatever we wish we were.
Last edited:


