shy slave
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Posts
- 8,255
incubus'_sub said:LOL, me neither. Incubus I mean, not Andante. Some things might be pushing the point a wee bit too far. J's comment struck a chord & a smile in me too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
incubus'_sub said:LOL, me neither. Incubus I mean, not Andante. Some things might be pushing the point a wee bit too far. J's comment struck a chord & a smile in me too.
JMohegan said:You understand what I was saying. Yes, I think you really do.
A Desert Rose said:Yes, it makes sense to me, anyway. I've said it before... you can't be all things to someone, all the time.
Good to know. Thanks.incubus'_sub said:Yes, it works for Catalina just fine & probably lots of others as well.
I don't think anyone is in danger of being forceful to others who see things differently. We're just giving you a clap & saying yep, that works for us too.
That's very kind of you to say, Shy. Thank you.shy slave said:Yes, I understood.
I like your posts, they come across as clear, honest and open to discussion
JMohegan said:... Maybe. But maybe not. Because you can buy spontaneous gifts and organize his DVDs and research his work problems and make special dinners and give him unsolicited backrubs and walk in a way that gives him a better view of the boats..... BUT..... if he tells you to do something in the D/s portion of your relationship (in the bedroom, out of the bedroom, or some combination of the two), then you are going to be expected to do it.
...
Not hard for submissives to understand, that's true. But I have run across a lot of people over the years who are "pleasers in the exploring phase", as I referred to in the beginning of the post you are quoting.A Desert Rose said:I believe that most submissives would find no arguement with this post. If you don't accept that your obedience is expected, then you're in the wrong relationship.
If the ground rules don't work for you, then move along. I see a lot of manipulation (as in topping from the bottom) and that gets you nowhere... fast. You do as your told (or in other words, what is expected of you). That's not really hard for me to understand (and believe me, I have to break things down to the most fundemental elements to keep track and keep up. I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, as many will atest.) Shouldn't be for anyone else, either.
I understood exactly what you were saying and I opted to leave that part out... on purpose. I also opted to remove the words "experienced submissives" from my original post... on purpose.JMohegan said:Not hard for submissives to understand, that's true. But I have run across a lot of people over the years who are "pleasers in the exploring phase", as I referred to in the beginning of the post you are quoting.
They may be able to understand the words, but they don't really grasp the import of what is being said. It is sometimes hard to fathom what giving up control in some aspect of your life really means or feels like until you have experienced it.
I don't think you look stupid at all.A Desert Rose said:I understood exactly what you were saying and I opted to leave that part out... on purpose. I also opted to remove the words "experienced submissives" from my original post... on purpose.
[I've been flamed way too much here. I try to moderate my words which then seems to take away the point I'm trying to make. But it does avoid flames from others. It also makes me look stupid. For that, I apologize, because I don't really believe I am.]
And again, I agree with your post, this one and the one I quoted originally. I also believe that obedience is the FUNDEMENTAL way to please your Dom. It's worked for me, at least.
Yes, that's it exactly. Because this gets to the heart of why he considers himself a "Dom" in the first place.A Desert Rose said:I also believe that obedience is the FUNDEMENTAL way to please your Dom.
JMohegan said:But I have spoken to many "pleasers" in the exploring phase who don't really grasp what many dominants mean when they talk about power exchange or a transfer of control. They look at submissives talking about the urge to please their mate, and they see the joy expressed by people in the lifestyle, and they think that maybe this could be a way for them to find happiness and fulfillment in relationships too.
Maybe. But maybe not. Because you can buy spontaneous gifts and organize his DVDs and research his work problems and make special dinners and give him unsolicited backrubs and walk in a way that gives him a better view of the boats..... BUT..... if he tells you to do something in the D/s portion of your relationship (in the bedroom, out of the bedroom, or some combination of the two), then you are going to be expected to do it.
This is the area where I see a lot of people tripping up as they try to enter the D/s world, and this is why I have been focusing on the distinction between D/s and non-D/s in your thread about D/s compatibility.
submissiveknight said:Thank You RJ for your reply.And yes it is nice to see yourself in others! Today in my case I'm more partial to the obediant side. Reason being I really messed up this week and disobeyed my Mistress! I needed to be somewhere and ended up an hour late and She was absolutly livid. I knew She was really mad when I had to request my own punishment. She accepted my letter of request as adequate. She also thought it a proper idea to create a thread to solicit some ideas for Her punishment. So later this weekend I'll have to start a thread for my punishment come one come all and help with your creativity. But I have one question, would this thread go in the TALK or CHAT room? She will be very happy for everyone to get involved
JMohegan said:Unless I have greatly misunderstood Catalina's comments, for example, I believe she views her relationship in just this way. It doesn't work for me, and in fact I know very, very few people who live D/s this way. But that doesn't mean that the dynamic does not exist and it does not mean that it is inappropriate in all situations.
A Desert Rose said:I It also makes me look stupid. For that, I apologize, because I don't really believe I am.
sharezade said:HisMajesty has no real use/need/desire for anything I offer. At best, I get a nod...occassionally. He does, however, require absolute obedience. Then I get 2 nods.
Therein lies the rub. To get much more than a nod, I really hafta piss him off...but if I piss him off, then I don't deserve any attention.
Um...which way to the confused and neglected sub space?
I'm with Shy here. If someone has no use/need/desire for you, why on earth would you stay there?sharezade said:HisMajesty has no real use/need/desire for anything I offer. At best, I get a nod...occassionally. He does, however, require absolute obedience. Then I get 2 nods.
Therein lies the rub. To get much more than a nod, I really hafta piss him off...but if I piss him off, then I don't deserve any attention.
Um...which way to the confused and neglected sub space?
BeachGurl2 said:I'm with Shy here. If someone has no use/need/desire for you, why on earth would you stay there?
Edited: I just read your profile. Is your husband your master?
Mini hijack - sorry, RJ.sharezade said:Bingo! Things were a lot more "fulfilling" before the wedding. Maybe I shouldn'ta chose the ring over the collar, huh?