Rough & Loving It

Netzach, are we still doing this?

If you misquote me, its going to be pointed out. You did, and it was. Enough said.

One could also argue that a self defined shorty who gets off on kicking anyone anywhere is not only sexually insecure, but emotionally challenged and just plain off.

But Im not nearly as judgmental as you, so its unlikely I would say something like that.

Im sorry my opinions affect you so much you feel the need to go on and on and on about this. Your technique seems to be misquote, seethe, misquote, rave, misquote.

I hope you'll forgive me for saying your views on my opinions arent terribly important to me. You have yours. I have mine. They are different.

That's life.
 
Last edited:
rosco rathbone said:
I was just thinking that the "quiet, masterful, people-just-find-themselves-obeying" thing doesn't apply to a single dom that I know. Most doms I know are like me--just regular guys with issues about getting their way with women.

Thats my point.

It wouldnt apply to most of the men/doms that anyone knows.

Alphas are rare.

And they usually get what they want without having to exert much effort.

Its in the way a man carries himself - not the way he whips or chains someone.

And IME, they are more often quiet than not - because they dont need to be loud, obnoxious or rude.
 
nymphee said:
Surely explaining it would be a bad thing? When we can explain something it always seems less intoxicating- if the people who indulge in submission could understand why they love it, most of them would stop writing about it, talking about it, people would never find out anything new. It wouldn't be fascinating anymore.

Or perhaps I'm just making excuses for really not having a clue.

Successfully explaining it might be bad. The verbally hotwired amongst us will never cease to get off on trying, though.
 
Netzach said:
"I want to fuck you like an animal"

You want to nut in 3 seconds turn away and lick your fur?

I actually find this quite hot, and also perverse in its application to humans in these how to make love to a woman times we live in.

Premature ejaculation is sexual.
 
rosco rathbone said:
Successfully explaining it might be bad. The verbally hotwired amongst us will never cease to get off on trying, though.

There are those who know themselves, and those who dont.

And then there are those who think they do.
 
IsabellaSnow said:
There are those who know themselves, and those who dont.

And then there are those who think they do.

I'm just getting a chuckle out of seeing Netz get a spanking. No one has the stones to argue with her around here.
 
rosco rathbone said:
I'm just getting a chuckle out of seeing Netz get a spanking. No one has the stones to argue with her around here.

I really have no interest in arguing with her.

This isnt nobel worthy philosophy - its just my opinion, for fuck's sake.

:rolleyes:
 
IsabellaSnow said:
I really have no interest in arguing with her.

This isnt nobel worthy philosophy - its just my opinion, for fuck's sake.

:rolleyes:

the personal is political they say.
 
rosco rathbone said:
the personal is political they say.

"They" being the feminists.

And I'm no feminist.

My views and opinions are not influenced by the external spectrum of political and social doctrines. Therefore, my personal is not political.

'Night, Rosco.

(And you were so wrong for saying that about the hottie porn star!!! ;) )
 
Post 58:
IsabellaSnow said:
I'm about as dominant as they come - and I would never want a man in my bed that I could coerce, conform, or control in any way shape or form.

I honestly think dominant women who think they want this simply have yet to meet truly dominant male.
Post 60:
IsabellaSnow said:
But I somehow feel like my definition of being dominated in bed is crossing wires with some other defintions. So I think at this point though Id like to clarify something - when I say I like to be dominated - I should maybe rephrase that as I like someone TRYING to dominate me.

To be even more succinct - I enjoy wrestling. But sexy wriestling. With lots of foreplay. If you know what I'm saying. So while I like to be dominated in bed, I dont mean I want to lick boots (and the first man who asks best be wearing a cup) or anything. I just want someone to physically overpower me.

Earn it.

Or watch it get up and walk out of the bedroom.
This "make me" bravado in post 60 belies the red-text claim in post 58.

Sounds to me as if you want a muscle boy to toss you around in bed.

I have muscles, but I am nobody's boy. And "make me" is a form of coercion for which I have no patience.

Feel free to post definitions of "dominant" (adj.) and "dominate" (v.) that reconcile your posts. Given my definitions, you're just not making sense on this thread.
 
I don't think you can expect a lot of continuity from a maverick so outside the influence of society. :rolleyes:
 
rosco rathbone said:
I actually find this quite hot, and also perverse in its application to humans in these how to make love to a woman times we live in.

Premature ejaculation is sexual.

This is one of the things I dig about your worldview, you get the value in the stuff we write off too easily.

SM kinda jives with the cult of the ubermench and you're down with the unter. I like.
 
JMohegan said:
Post 58:

Post 60:
This "make me" bravado in post 60 belies the red-text claim in post 58.

Sounds to me as if you want a muscle boy to toss you around in bed.

I have muscles, but I am nobody's boy. And "make me" is a form of coercion for which I have no patience.

Feel free to post definitions of "dominant" (adj.) and "dominate" (v.) that reconcile your posts. Given my definitions, you're just not making sense on this thread.


You've interpreted correctly, son.

If you view it as coercion - if you dont have the patience - you simply dont get the prize.

;)
 
IsabellaSnow said:
You've interpreted correctly, son.

If you view it as coercion - if you dont have the patience - you simply dont get the prize.

;)
In post 58, you clearly stated that you would never want a man in your bed whom you could coerce "in any way shape or form".

I interpreted post 60 as you expressing a preference for a man whom you can coerce into a wrestling match.

I asked you to reconcile this apparent contradiction, and your response was to say that I've "interpreted correctly".

While this confirms my understanding of post 60, it does nothing to address the contradiction between your remarks.


Post 67:

IsabellaSnow said:
I suspect our definitions of various terms vary greatly.
Clearly.

Including the definition of "prize".
 
I would not want a man in my bed that I could control, coerce, etc.

I dont seek out wrestling matches, if that was your impression.

I never said I initiate it, and therefore fail to see the contradiction.

Which means you misinterpreted all on your own.

You didnt mention that was how you'd interpreted it before, or Id have corrected you before now.

Sounds to me as if you want a muscle boy to toss you around in bed.

This is correct. I want a muscle boy to toss me around in bed.

I never said I viewed that as coercion - you did.

And Im happy to let you have your views.
 
IsabellaSnow said:
"They" being the feminists.

And I'm no feminist.

My views and opinions are not influenced by the external spectrum of political and social doctrines. Therefore, my personal is not political.

'Night, Rosco.

(And you were so wrong for saying that about the hottie porn star!!! ;) )

I just want to know what the hell's wrong with being a feminist. :confused:
 
BiBunny said:
I just want to know what the hell's wrong with being a feminist. :confused:

What Rosco said is a saying the feminists used back in the day during the women's movement.

I was pointing out it doesnt pertain to me - and why.

I said nothing about anything being wrong with being a feminist.

I simply said I am not one.
 
"enforced UN Program efeeminize all men, kofi annan standards, rules of int'l law not welcome..no rebellion...ape eater central park lawyer fairies swallow...
ha ha make funnies ha ha truth hurts to painful to look at heads in asses hidden"

-the late lamented lit genius Spermaceti
 
rosco rathbone said:
"enforced UN Program efeeminize all men, kofi annan standards, rules of int'l law not welcome..no rebellion...ape eater central park lawyer fairies swallow...
ha ha make funnies ha ha truth hurts to painful to look at heads in asses hidden"

-the late lamented lit genius Spermaceti


What are you trying to say, Rosco?

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top