You are exactly like Harpy — obstinately wrong.
Let’s review what’s happened in this thread:
That’s it.
- I posted a quote from an article that provided the jobs data as well as context from an expert.
- You lashed out at me because you didn’t agree with the context the expert provided.
As I said above, it would be better if the jobs estimates were higher but a healthy growth rate is objectively a good thing.
You want me to say that the downward revision is terrible and the sky is falling. But that’s not true so I won’t say it.
What I saw you do in your original response to "Right"guide’s use of a FOX business article that LACKED a full perspective on the jobs numbers revision, involved you presenting an article from Yahoo Finance, a more reliable and unbiased source, that INCLUDED a full perspective on the jobs numbers revision.
The additional information in the Yahoo Finance article provided important insight into understanding how consequential the jobs numbers revision actually was in the context of the overall economic numbers.
Ultimately:
The FOX Business article was bad. The Yahoo Finance article was good.
And:
The jobs numbers are good, despite the revision, while the overall economic numbers are also good - which tracks.