That's the art of mincing words. I've repeated time and time again that she HAS helped people but that in the long run (100 years down the road or even 10 or 30) it will have changed nothing on a big scale. Sure, many people are alive today because of what she did, but the world is still a shithole and despite her best efforts will remain one for quite some time.
...Is this really not getting through to anyone? Is it some internet glitch that zones out the brain into missing the repeated times I've said that she and many others have done wonders for the world but that in the long run it'll have changed nothing because not enough people are helping?
And as for more people are helping than I think. If we put it in numbers, I'm pretty sure the ratio would range around the 10:1.
For every 10 people who don't help at all, 1 person does.
What is the BIG SCALE you keep referring to? We all know history repeats itself so how does anything ONE person does REALLY affect the future? 100 years down the road is too far to worry about anyway as none of us will be there to give a shit....

. I checked out your video and it reminds me a lot of the article satindesire gave me. The only problem with this graphic is that although many countries are much more prosperous than ever, their wealth is split in two. You've got a select few who are extremely rich and the rest of the country wallowing in poverty (China is a perfect example of this). Life expectancy has climbed in large part due to hygiene. Science has come a long way, but the fact of the matter is that our LE would be far higher were it not for corporate control of genetic modifications and, well... you get the jist of what I mean. In the end, a lot of what you eat isn't all that great for you (or isn't as natural as it should be). True, we've come a long way in science and health and all, but in terms of wealthy countries... it doesn't mean its people aren't poor as shit.