Where are you?

[00Syd]

I would prefer someone who didn't dropout from high school anyway. Dating someone who didn't learn to read would be too much pain for me.

..right.

*looks at high school diploma*

*looks at college enrollment*

*notices that she is, in fact, reading*

 

[Primalex]

..right.

*looks at high school diploma*

*looks at college enrollment*

You are brave enough to tell me that you (and your parents and the country) wasted thousands of dollars for your school education?

*notices that she is, in fact, reading*

Yeah, you are reading.. and this woman is parking. Sure.

 

[Primalex]

I just read here that you are still underage. You can go now, I don't need victims, I prefer challenges.

 

[00Syd]

I just read here that you are still underage. You can go now, I don't need victims, I prefer challenges.

Not sure where you live, but 20 is not underage. Unless you mean for drinking.

 

[Etoile]

Damn, who peed in Primalex's wheaties? 00Syd is one of the sharpest tacks on this board, so to speak.

Besides, Primey, you shouldn't be trolling for personals here, you know perfectly well that's another board.

Now stop being an ass and go away.

 

[Primalex]

Not sure where you live, but 20 is not underage. Unless you mean for drinking.

I mean for talking with me, stupid.

 

[Primalex]

Damn, who peed in Primalex's wheaties? 00Syd is one of the sharpest tacks on this board, so to speak.

Besides, Primey, you shouldn't be trolling for personals here, you know perfectly well that's another board.

I'm not trolling for personals here, Toiley. I'm wondering about the cause-and-effect chain, f.e. if there can be incidents in the adolescence that increase the likelihood of the development of a submissive nature. Sorry that you didn't get it.

Now stop being an ass and go away.

I'm supposed to go away in my very own thread? Did you drink today?

If you are in the mood to bitch about threads that don't belong into BDSM Talk, start with "Hey baby what's your sign" or "male sharing photos" or "Where are the naturally hairy women?" etc. After you've cleaned up, you can come here and whine again.

 

[BiBunny]

I'm looking for a sub.

I'm looking for a sub without issues that grew up like in a female version of "The Truman Show''. Normal.

You disqualify f.e. if
- you were raped, molested or sexually abused (non-consensual)(in your adolescence)
- you grew up with a bipolar parent or sibling
- you had a serious traumatic experience in your past
- you were sentenced for a crime
- you suffer from obsessive compulsive disorder
...

Do you exist?

(No need to worry, I'm not looking for a date.)

I exist. But I'm fat. So I'm disqualified, too.

 

[Primalex]

I exist. But I'm fat. So I'm disqualified, too.

Fat people only disqualify as a date, they might still provide useful insight into the submissive development. And as I'm not looking for a date here (the "I'm not looking for a date" is a good hint), this isn't a reason for disqualification. But I think you disqualify because I really can't believe that your past was issue-free, you are way too fucked up (not a negative rating).

 

[Netzach]

my husband fits the profile other than the "female" part, and some anal tendencies that might be a problem if you define OCD really broadly. In fact most of the men I've had the pleasure of working with are altogether too steeped in the well adjusted. If your point is that only severe emotional damage is what makes a girl want what you've got, well, you'll find the results you want most.

If you're having issues finding normalcy and it's what you want, maybe it's a case of like attracting like.

 

[Etoile]

If you are in the mood to bitch about threads that don't belong into BDSM Talk, start with "Hey baby what's your sign" or "male sharing photos" or "Where are the naturally hairy women?" etc. After you've cleaned up, you can come here and whine again.

You seem to have me confused with someone else.

 

[Netzach]

I mean for talking with me, stupid.

That really would make a well adjusted girl wet for you.

 

[BiBunny]

Fat people only disqualify as a date, they might still provide useful insight into the submissive development. And as I'm not looking for a date here (the "I'm not looking for a date" is a good hint), this isn't a reason for disqualification. But I think you disqualify because I really can't believe that your past was issue-free, you are way too fucked up (not a negative rating).

Issue-free? No. Nobody's is. I know I'm twelve kinds of fucked up. But no major traumatic moments or horrid sexual abuse or anything. I was an only child with an overbearing mother. That was about it. Lots of only children have overprotective parents. *Shrug*

And, yes, the fat thing was tongue-in-cheek.

 

[00Syd]

I mean for talking with me, stupid.

Ah, yes, because you are so mature. Who else but other mature, adult-type people would be able to comprehend your sophisticated conversation?

If you don't want to talk to women on the younger side of life, you should have made that one of your qualifiers, maybe?

 

[OLDERNWISER]

.....

 

[smeffbavie]

Uhm...what?

Hi. I'm beth. I'm new here.

And I'm kind of shocked, to be honest. I personally qualify as a "normal" submissive by your set standards.

Kudos to me.

However, I don't understand how someone so amazingly concieted and pompus could ever be considered a proper Dom.

To treat submissives like they are not even human, when are not even in YOUR service, is unthinkable to me. If you are someone's Master and they wish for you to treat them like a stupid fuck, then by all means do.

But as for now you're just coming across as an arrogant asshole.

 

[Primalex]

Ah, yes, because you are so mature.

No, because I don't want to hurt children.

Who else but other mature, adult-type people would be able to comprehend your sophisticated conversation?

Actually nobody is able to fully comprehend it besides me. It feels a little less weird when I stop talking with myself and instead write here though.

If you don't want to talk to women on the younger side of life, you should have made that one of your qualifiers, maybe?

I talk with them.
I even fuck them.
I just give the bratty ones who have no idea what they are doing a chance to reconsider their course gracefully with me looking like an asshole, so they can stop the communication with a witty response like "You are such an asshole, I stop this discussion now." Of course the stupid ones don't get it but this isn't my fault then.

 

[Primalex]

However, I don't understand how someone so amazingly concieted and pompus could ever be considered a proper Dom.

Because you have no idea what you are talking about. Come back in 20 years.

To treat submissives like they are not even human, when are not even in YOUR service, is unthinkable to me.

First of all, I don't treat anyone as he wouldn't be human.

Second, I treat animals better than humans. I'm Greenpeace and WWF member - not ACLU. The notion that I wouldn't treat people here like humans makes no sense therefore. If I had to choose between killing you or some stray dog - you should beg that I won't treat you as a human.

Third, I treat everyone the same: male, female, submissive, dominant. I treat them like they are worthless, unless they did manage to make me think they deserve a better treatment. Some get the benefit of doubt, some don't. There are some submissives I respect and some dominants I respect and there are some submissives I don't respect and some dominants I don't respect. This is life. Get over it.

So take your analysis of my behaviour and shove it right up your ass, because you are right now at the bottom of the barrel of appreciation for talking without having any clue. Hell, you are even below WD.

 

[Netzach]

ooooo how badass. Dennis Leary much?

 

[Primalex]

Well, I would get a 1967 Cadillac Eldorado convertible, too. Maybe we are twins.

 

[smeffbavie]

My age has nothing to do with any of this.

Why should I care if you are part of the WWF? That has no relevance here at all. Did I say you treat people like animals? No. I didn't. I just said you don't treat them as human. So congrats on your failed sass.

Furthermore, I don't really care about the destinction between who you respect and who you don't. The point is that the way you are treating people on this thread is unacceptable, whether you respect them or not. I don't care of you respect anyone here, I didn't say you should, I just said that you are by no means better than anyone here, and should speak only with that knowledge firmly in your grasp.

Whether someone has earned your amazingly hard to attain respect or not, they're still a person, and this is still a social situation. Certain protocols demand following.

I'm 18 and I'm presenting a more articulate argument than you. Maybe it's you that needs to do some learning.

 

[Primalex]

I just said that you are by no means better than anyone here

Do you think that you are better than me?

If you think so, because you behave nicely and I behave like an asshole, then I do have the very same right to believe that I'm better than other persons who behave in a way I don't like. This means you are wrong that I'm by no means better than anyone.

If you don't think so, why the fuck do you complain? If you are not better, you should start by improving yourself.

My age has nothing to do with any of this.

My behaviour has nothing to do with any of this.

Why should I care if you are part of the WWF?

Why do you care at all what I write?

Did I say you treat people like animals? No. I didn't. I just said you don't treat them as human.

You don't know either how I treat plants, robots, aliens, cars etc., so no matter what you meant, the result is the same, stupid.

The point is that the way you are treating people on this thread is unacceptable,

Ohh... it is "unacceptable". I guess you have no other choice than to accept it or to die instantly, because I won't change how I treat people just so you can have a nice and cozy feeling in your tummy.

Certain protocols demand following.

Mr. Protocol is currently on vacation.

Okay, let's get serious:

Are you on drugs? You really should stop it. It's not good for you.

 

[00Syd]

Actually nobody is able to fully comprehend it besides me. It feels a little less weird when I stop talking with myself and instead write here though.

Ah, so you spend most of your time talking to yourself. That explains a lot.

 

[smeffbavie]

The fact that you even have to respond with something like "are you on drugs?" is a pretty clear indication of what a weak person you are.

I never said I was better than you. In fact I think your spirit is admirable.

But the fact remains that you really don't get any point across by acting like a douche.

I believe this thread was started because you had a question about the nature of submission?

Maybe if instead of insulting everyone who posted, you actually listened to some people, you'd get better responses and find the answer to your question.


You can do whatever you will with that, personally, I'm done with arguing about something that doesn't affect me.

 

[Primalex]

The fact that you even have to respond with something like "are you on drugs?" is a pretty clear indication of what a weak person you are.

Assuming I'm a "weak person" (whatever this is), then it's good that everyone knows it, right? Your suggestions that I should change my behaviour would allow me to fake something. We don't want that poor young little innocent subs fall for me, do we? So it's best if I insult the people much more than I already do.

But the fact remains that you really don't get any point across by acting like a douche.

Really? I think I got my point across. You did understand that you are worth less than the dirt under my toenail right now, didn't you?

I believe this thread was started because you had a question about the nature of submission?

No. I was taking samples.

Maybe if instead of insulting everyone who posted, you actually listened to some people, you'd get better responses and find the answer to your question.

I listened to the people who wrote something useful and insulted those who were too stupid. This is a fair deal in my opinion.