That's the part that won't work. We won't have the luxury of rigidly defined and bordered social and racial classes. One income households may return, with one person doing most of the household chores to save more money than they would get with a second income. Whoever can get the better job may be the one working. If the husband wants to wear high heels and pearls while washing dishes, I won't judge.
OBAMA turned the US economy around and brought us out of the BUSH recession. He ushered in a record string of monthly job growth that extended into Trump's term. Trump did not turn the economy around because it was already growing. He maintained that economic growth rate for his first three years (all the while taking credit for all the previous 11 years of growth). He nearly bankrupted soy bean farmers with tariffs that drove away their foreign customers and he had to bail them out with subsidies (welfare). Trump left office in an economy that was failing, with high unemployment and a sputtering economy. America is not going back to that.
Well, that’s a great tell me you’re a racist without telling me you’re a racist comment. Well done Archie Bunker!
I have never heard of one person in a couple staying home saves money on household chores. I have heard of one parent staying home because it more than offsets child care. But trump will fix that, if anyone can figure out what he actually said on the subject recently, probably, maybe.
Good on ya. But typically conservatives loudly judge publicly, while in private letting their freak flag fly. Toe tapping in airport bathroom stalls a case in point.
That's history. We had more racial divisions when the nation was wealthier. There was northern European, southern European, Jewish, Mexican, and so on down a long list, plus all the religious divisions. Now we have mostly white and black. In the much poorer nation we will eventually become, race may be forgotten as silly nonsense.
Quoted because holy shitsky!
So are you walking back the racist comment by reverting to historical perspectives? Your post end will likely be true in time.
I attempted to correct your misinterpretation, but you're trapped in your beliefs that require you to see racism everywhere.
Not so much. Your “luxury of” and wish to return to the 50s speaks to a mindset, though.
No it’s not.
Odd comment.
Hard data. That’s rich, as the saying goes.
Stagflation is a term first used in the last century. You seem to have a very short understanding of American politics which diminishes your credibility. The assault on the American voters and the institutions of our constitutional institutions on January 6, 2021, is something that decent, law abiding Americans will never forgive Trump and his Republican enablers for especially while they remain unrepentant for their sins.
The term stagflation goes back to 1965, dingus. C'mon man, you're ancient enough to remember the 70s.
Mark this day in history, folks. Derpy admitted he was wrong. And he did so without telling another poster to go fuck himself.
In 2016, Donald Trump was an unknown quantity. Now people know exactly who he is and how he would govern. He’s going to lose despite China and Russia trying to prop him up.
Bitching about petty BS on the internet is another luxury soon gone.
Please cite one of trump's economic policies.
Because the public doesn’t do the rankings.
You seem to misunderstand the procedure of the ranking. Multiple people, typically presidential historians, independently rank presidents on the basis of a number of categories. Then, the historians rankings are compared and sorted and that’s what you’re claiming is a popular vote. You conveniently left out the methodology.
The economy was chugging along just fine under trump, I agree. Which means he didn’t fuck up what he inherited from Obama. Then Covid hit and the world shared the economic hardships, with the US bouncing back better than some.
I certainly hope not!
