Why it is important to doubt the gatekeepers....

[JaySecrets]

Citing a video that JaySecretions applauded / approved as being “very much on topic”, (and pointing out how said video undermines nearly EVERYTHING in the OP) is an attempt to “change the subject???



JaySecretions

Remember when I said in my premise that BOTH sides do this, that I have an issue with the pro-Trump side doing it (with the small handful of conservative-leaning sources that have been allowed or able to survive out there in this left-leaning and left-controlled environment) as much as I do the anti-Trump side? Yes, that report makes my point well. The crazy thing is, the examples of the left doing it are infinitely more numerous, and on THE CONTROLLING information platforms being used worldwide today. So we are back to the challenge. PROVE THE CLAIM WRONG BY YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND POST THE SCREEN SHOTS! If you can't do this, you have no case. The claims have been made. The exact way it was tested was spelled out. It's easy to disprove. Reproduce the test.

 

[Bn2f]

Apparently you have not been to the grocery store or work in retail. Those of us who actually have to deal and trade in those inflated prices.... You know what, nevermind. You have not only chugged the Kool-Aid, you did it with a blindfold on and you have forgotten how to untie the knot.

Back to the topic at hand. ANY of y'all have the balls to actually take my challenge, do your own verification, and prove me wrong? I am, according to you, a stupid, brainwashed ignoramus. Certainly this is going to be the easiest bet of your life.

Unless you KNOW your side is lying but you are so committed to the lie that you have to keep defending it.

You support trump. You believed his 30k lies told in the 4 years he was president. Lies that killed. You can STFU. No one needs to take your purity test.

 

[Lazaran]

Remember when I said in my premise that BOTH sides do this, that I have an issue with the pro-Trump side doing it (with the small handful of conservative-leaning sources that have been allowed or able to survive out there in this left-leaning and left-controlled environment) as much as I do the anti-Trump side? Yes, that report makes my point well. The crazy thing is, the examples of the left doing it are infinitely more numerous, and on THE CONTROLLING information platforms being used worldwide today. So we are back to the challenge. PROVE THE CLAIM WRONG BY YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND POST THE SCREEN SHOTS! If you can't do this, you have no case. The claims have been made. The exact way it was tested was spelled out. It's easy to disprove. Reproduce the test.

JaySecretions "thinks" that sane, decent, intelligent people are going to participate in JaySecretion’s red herring-wild goose chase, just so JaySecretions can turn around and say “Nuh-uuuuuuh” when confronted with contradictory evidence that completely destroys JaySecretion’s entire bullshit narrative - like the video in post #26 that JaySecretion clearly didn’t understand.



JaySecretions

 

[YDB95]

My queries have been clearly seeking conservative sources or very specific documents. The algorithm has routed my searches to liberal biased information and had the suggested questions all come from a liberal standpoint.

Here's what you don't get: the results you're seeing are simply a matter of your own bias, which you are mistaking for the truth. You have a long and extremely consistent history of believing things anyone else would recognize as propaganda, simply because it's what you want to believe. (I could probably dig up over a hundred examples of this, but I'll settle for one particularly memorable one: the videos you claim to have seen that showed embryos screaming in pain during an abortion.)

What you're really doing with what you describe here, is looking for validation for what you want to be true. When you don't find it, you think it's liberal bias, but it isn't - it's reality.

 

[AlexBailey]

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 are very serious about gate keeping.


https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

Page 38 :

“Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.”

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Remember when I said in my premise that BOTH sides do this, that I have an issue with the pro-Trump side doing it (with the small handful of conservative-leaning sources that have been allowed or able to survive out there in this left-leaning and left-controlled environment) as much as I do the anti-Trump side? Yes, that report makes my point well. The crazy thing is, the examples of the left doing it are infinitely more numerous, and on THE CONTROLLING information platforms being used worldwide today. So we are back to the challenge. PROVE THE CLAIM WRONG BY YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND POST THE SCREEN SHOTS! If you can't do this, you have no case. The claims have been made. The exact way it was tested was spelled out. It's easy to disprove. Reproduce the test.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 are very serious about gate keeping.


https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

Page 38 :

“Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.”

All you 'Pub RW Conservatives who love smut shit, you got an answer to this?

'cuz you know you're only here shooting your shots through the grace of liberalism in praxis. We give you the space to become the freak you want to. be.

 

[icanhelp1]

I never said YOU are a lib. I said the PHd you are citing is a liberal whose word I don't trust any more than Kamala Harris or Joe Biden, and that people blindly trust this lib's very biased, falsified information research, and say don't trust your lying eyes, trust him because he is smarter than you.... That is the very problem being pointed out

#34 last paragraph seemed to roll me up as a liberal.

PHd Epstein support’s your premise should you take the time to read Epstein’s testimony before the Senate judiciary.

 

[BeawulfAR]

It isn not just the internet search engines that have gatekeepers. The "scientific" journals that publish research are controlled by a cadre of editors and publishers who are profoundly biased. A cadre of gatekeepers also control the allocation of research grants. This is the only reason why anyhropogenic global warming theology is taken seriously.

 

[ll74]

It isn not just the internet search engines that have gatekeepers. The "scientific" journals that publish research are controlled by a cadre of editors and publishers who are profoundly biased. A cadre of gatekeepers also control the allocation of research grants. This is the only reason why anyhropogenic global warming theology is taken seriously.

Aaw...did your flat earth white paper get denied?

 

[Bn2f]

It isn not just the internet search engines that have gatekeepers. The "scientific" journals that publish research are controlled by a cadre of editors and publishers who are profoundly biased. A cadre of gatekeepers also control the allocation of research grants. This is the only reason why anyhropogenic global warming theology is taken seriously.

Science ain’t gatekeepin.

I would be embarrassed posting this but like someone on this thread said before:

Every goddamn day good and honest members have to tap on their keyboards and dispute people who are never embarrassed nor shamed by their displays of ignorance to outright dishonesty.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

This really says it all…

She can’t think on her toes. She really is a dimwit.

 

[glamorilla]

This really says it all…

She can’t think on her toes. She really is a dimwit.

China: We are building coal plants, altering your food, infiltrating your government!

Russia: We are destroying the dollar from within!

Iran: Death to all Jews and Christians! Flood their countries! rape their women.

the US: the wheels on the bus go round and round.

 

[Bn2f]

This really says it all…

She can’t think on her toes. She really is a dimwit.

Hey? Idiot!

the trump thread is over there —>

 

[JaySecrets]

The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 are very serious about gate keeping.


https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

Page 38 :

“Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.”

You are aware that Trump has blanketly rejected Project 2025, right. That was actually one of the issues that Kamala Harris was called on for her several lies in her big speech when it was fact checked.

But again, you still haven't even approached answering the premise of this thread. Funny how you want people to stay on topic on your threads but refuse to even address the topic here.

You lefties and your sidestepping the issue are proving the weakness of your position. So again, the challenge has been made. Does even one of you have the balls to take it up?

 

[ll74]

You are aware that Trump has blanketly rejected Project 2025, right. That was actually one of the issues that Kamala Harris was called on for her several lies in her big speech when it was fact checked.

But again, you still haven't even approached answering the premise of this thread. Funny how you want people to stay on topic on your threads but refuse to even address the topic here.

You lefties and your sidestepping the issue are proving the weakness of your position. So again, the challenge has been made. Does even one of you have the balls to take it up?

He hasn't rejected the platform in any way

 

[JaySecrets]

View attachment 2369958

Not really. Your side rarely seems to want to address the issues on your side. The racism, the anti-semitic language, the anti-troop statements, the ignoring of the electoral process.... But our side actually calling out both sides including those on our own side is.... You really have lost your mind!

But still no answer to the challenge. Go figure. Easy to prove right or wrong, so why does the truth scare you so?

 

[JaySecrets]

All you 'Pub RW Conservatives who love smut shit, you got an answer to this?

'cuz you know you're only here shooting your shots through the grace of liberalism in praxis. We give you the space to become the freak you want to. be.

Lol.... You are posting using the image of the member of one of the worst, most left-leaning shows on television, and one that is now so unhinged that she is now a problem for that show. Says a lot about you, methinks.

 

[ll74]

Lol.... You are posting using the image of the member of one of the worst, most left-leaning shows on television, and one that is now so unhinged that she is now a problem for that show. Says a lot about you, methinks.

Yes, absolutely brilliant move to trigger you into this post thinking that Zuni was unaware.

 

[JaySecrets]

Science ain’t gatekeepin.

I would be embarrassed posting this but like someone on this thread said before:

Every goddamn day good and honest members have to tap on their keyboards and dispute people who are never embarrassed nor shamed by their displays of ignorance to outright dishonesty.

So it's simple. Do the test. Run the searches. Show the screenshots. Prove us ignorant liars wrong. A lot of arguing about whether or not the light switch works. Why are none of you willing to actually flip the switch to prove it?

 

[JaySecrets]

This really says it all…

She can’t think on her toes. She really is a dimwit.

I agree. Also not quite the point of this thread. Can you connect the point here to what is attempted to be discussed here? Again, not knocking you. Trying to be fair. Can't call one side for not being on topic, but say nothing about the other side.

Because, unlike the claim earlier, both sides arguments don't protect the right. They keep BOTH SIDES accountable.

 

[JaySecrets]

View attachment 2369958

Btw, if both sides arguments SEEM to defend Republicans, maybe it's because Dems are far more egregious in their wrongdoing and their defense of their own offenders than anything on the Republican side. Just a thought.


But really not the main point here. Just a reasoned response to a bumper sticker thoughtless meme.

 

[glamorilla]

they're currently trying to remove the taraji/harris bet awards ad. when i google up "taraji p henson kamala harris bet awards ad" i do get directed to the actual bet website where you can view it...but it is under a paywall. outside of that its hard to find the video anywhere else. you'll find snippets, reaction video...but not the full ad. theres no copy of it in its entirety on youtube, twitter gave the same results.

given the election is a few months away we're going to be flooded with ads so i get something like this would get lost in the flotsam...but you would still be able to find it if you focused in on it rather than just scrollig through various pages of random political ads.

if you want something taken off the internet you do it quietly, slowly and over time.

 

[glamorilla]

i ust typed "taraji p henson kamala harris bet awards ad" into youtubes search and a video about it was the 15th option down the line and it was a response video.

 

[ll74]

they're currently trying to remove the taraji/harris bet awards ad. when i google up "taraji p henson kamala harris bet awards ad" i do get directed to the actual bet website where you can view it...but it is under a paywall. outside of that its hard to find the video anywhere else. you'll find snippets, reaction video...but not the full ad. theres no copy of it in its entirety on youtube, twitter gave the same results.

given the election is a few months away we're going to be flooded with ads so i get something like this would get lost in the flotsam...but you would still be able to find it if you focused in on it rather than just scrollig through various pages of random political ads.

if you want something taken off the internet you do it quietly, slowly and over time.

Wtf are you talking about?