Lol... Thanks, but I suspect that it is less about my being smart than it is about my having paid attention and done my research. I don't care if people like or agree with me. I'd just like to see some intellectual honesty.
If Trump is smart, and he is, he won't fully divulge much of that until he is in the middle of it, assuming he gets elected of course. The overview and general agenda, of course. But the way the left has acted toward any Trump agenda, it is accomplished in its details more effectively while y'all are chasing the shiny things the left and the media in particular throw out there without real facts to back them up. You gotta love the brilliance of someone who knows how to use their opposition's own actions to their own mission's benefit. This, by the way, is why we conservatives were laughing so hard at the Trump Derangement Syndrome on your side. We knew he actually could have been won to your side if you had played ball with him. Instead you freaked out. It was the conservatives who were actually paying attention
CNN is one of the most corrupt, biased, dishonest sources out there. I found the discussion interesting, as far as I could stomach Jake's dishonesty and twisting of her words. Poorly wording something in the midst of that many interviews isn't lying. She clarified what she meant to begin with. The woman was impeccably honest every time she spoke. And honestly, as unfiltered as Trump is, I don't think he has the capacity for the level of lying you accuse him of. The only reason you think he lies so much is BECAUSE you buy what the media and Google and YouTube and the rest are selling with their scrubs, information hiding, and creative edits.
I agree that I wish the man's ego would let him shut up when he is winning. We have griped about that for a while on the right now. But ego and grandiose overstatements don't add up to blatant lying. They add up to a big, arrogant, and mildly annoying personality... I wonder who on the left has the same problem.
The lying is what makes it blatant lying. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trumps-rnc-speechIf Trump is smart, and he is, he won't fully divulge much of that until he is in the middle of it, assuming he gets elected of course. The overview and general agenda, of course. But the way the left has acted toward any Trump agenda, it is accomplished in its details more effectively while y'all are chasing the shiny things the left and the media in particular throw out there without real facts to back them up. You gotta love the brilliance of someone who knows how to use their opposition's own actions to their own mission's benefit. This, by the way, is why we conservatives were laughing so hard at the Trump Derangement Syndrome on your side. We knew he actually could have been won to your side if you had played ball with him. Instead you freaked out. It was the conservatives who were actually paying attention
CNN is one of the most corrupt, biased, dishonest sources out there. I found the discussion interesting, as far as I could stomach Jake's dishonesty and twisting of her words. Poorly wording something in the midst of that many interviews isn't lying. She clarified what she meant to begin with. The woman was impeccably honest every time she spoke. And honestly, as unfiltered as Trump is, I don't think he has the capacity for the level of lying you accuse him of. The only reason you think he lies so much is BECAUSE you buy what the media and Google and YouTube and the rest are selling with their scrubs, information hiding, and creative edits.
I agree that I wish the man's ego would let him shut up when he is winning. We have griped about that for a while on the right now. But ego and grandiose overstatements don't add up to blatant lying. They add up to a big, arrogant, and mildly annoying personality... I wonder who on the left has the same problem.
Lets allow that you are technically right for a moment. If I say, from a position of power, to a very motivated base to my agenda, "There's a lot of January 6th people out there sitting in jail and they REALLY could use bail money. Just saying."... Are you going to say, "Well, technically he wasn't asking for donations." Of course not. The denial of what she did is more creative editing. Remember this is the same media and gatekeepers that simultaneously ignored that the Steele Dossier was Russian disinformation, yet took a joke about, "Hey Russia, Hillary can't find her missing emails. Maybe you can help her out?" (a hysterical joke to anyone who was paying attention, btw), and turned it into, "Trump is openly asking Russia to interfere in the election!" This is just blatant intellectual dishonesty.
All Sides rates CNN as “leans left”. There are many site that are more biased.
I am not a Musk fan. I find him weird. His ties to the Transhumanism Movement scare the the heeby-jeebies out of me. So I really hate that Musk is a better source of actual fact checking that your media and search engine sources. Stop making me agree with the creepy dude!
Harris supports bail reform, as do I. The right wing tries to make her position on this to be a negative. That's dumb. Judges should remand criminal defendants based on their danger to society rather than how much money they have.
Not YOURS, my friend... The lefties. You were not the target of the comment
CNN literally got caught on tape in their board meetings saying that they had a responsibility to run Trump attack stories, even if they were less than factual, because Trump was such a horrible monster and needed cancelled. They literally told their reporters to be lefty activists in their reporting! You don't get much more biased and left leaning than that!
Actually.... very true. The man is far more aligned, or at least was when it was politically convenient, with conservative views on those fronts. Again, paying attention, you find the reasons behind narratives.
I consider "peer reviewed" studies suspect when I am looking at my very obviously green shirt and they keep insisting that it is blue. Scientists are not immune to bias or corruption, and the bigger the money involved, the bigger the grants, the bigger the donations, the more corrupt they get. Have we forgotten the axiom about absolute power? I prefer to go with a variation on the Regan quote at this point. Distrust and verify.
Idk. That’s some quick change artistry right there. JS can put sentences together. Glam? Boxarocks.
Come on now, be honest… or maybe you simply don’t remember how immediately after Trump said “Hey Russia…” that the leaked documents were released.
Did I not say that I object when either side does this? I would rather see the Trump crowd respond with substance to such tweets. I just find it interesting that your results didn't show the hundreds of times that the Obama and Biden WH did this and worse to reporters and insiders who were in the process of actually exposing them. Reported and shown, your gatekeepers said, "Oh, hell naw!", and the reports and evidence got scrubbed, edited, or buried. One side attempts ONCE what your side does constantly, and you say, "AHA! GOTTCHA!!!" But you want to ignore and deflect from what you are doing in your own yard.
In your OP you cited All Sides as a reliable neutral neutral site. I disagreed with you and pointed out how they lean to the right. All Sides doesn't rate CNN as hard left. Why did you agree with All Sides before, but now say "CNN is one of the most corrupt, biased, dishonest sources out there"?
