Why so many cuckhold stories?

[sr71plt]

That is what I'm talking about and I believe it is a legitimate bitch. So, sr, if you don't like it, now know exactly what you can do with it!

Yep, I can post that I think you need to grow up, just stop reading what you don't like and move on quietly because there are others here who like to read that, and stop complaining about everything that hasn't been tailor-made to suit your squeamishness. Trust me, you won't die or melt even from having a bit of cuckoldry talk slipping into your brain before you can snip it off.

Raspberries to your claim that you haven't overridden the "I'm taking my marbles and going home" theme here.

 

[nakdsub]

sr,

I guess telling you to grow up would be a big waste of time. As I stated, I will continue to exercise my right to free speech in spite of your bloated opinion of yourself by thinking you have the right to tell others what they can or can not say.

Your infantile tantrums are amusing though, so please don't stop, they brighten my day with a good laugh.

 

[sr71plt]

I must remember to put a couple of cuckold sentences in the middle of my posts.

I do find it amusing that you abandoned your arguments and now are trying to usurp mine.

 

[nakdsub]

Sorry but...

Now you're not even making sense. I could argue with you further, but I hate taking advantage of those with minimal IQ's.

I am sure, when it comes to having your dick in your hand, you are well versed in the subject. Now, I don't imagine you would slink back into you cave and allow us adults to carry on an intelligent conversation, would you?

 

[sr71plt]

Now you're not even making sense. I could argue with you further, but I hate taking advantage of those with minimal IQ's.

I am sure, when it comes to having your dick in your hand, you are well versed in the subject. Now, I don't imagine you would slink back into you cave and allow us adults to carry on an intelligent conversation, would you?

Would this be an example of one of your "intelligent" conversations?

 

[scouries]

Please ace don't now start up with this nakedsub person. All of the forum world suffered as you and the comic girl chased each other from thread to thread day after day.It was brutal! Which is why I finally stepped in and took him off your plate. But now you're at it again! Ignore him! Please...

Just leave him to me. I'll get him to start a scouries thread and keep him busy and out of your way.

Be nice...​

 

[nakdsub]

Hey, the two fuck buddies are united again...

And I mean united! Between these two, they must have a terrible time trying to decide which one is on top.

sr, you do have a point, but you have to appreciate the difficulty of having an intelligent conversation with someone so far down the evolutionary scale.

 

[Mulenga225]

Cuckold? Any man that has never asked his wife about her past sexual experiences qualifies as being a purist and never being Cuckolded! This complainer has issues! Thank you originator for this tread!

 

[nakdsub]

I have to really laugh...

I just re-read sr's original answer to the question that started this thread in which he makes the statement;

If the story has a theme you don't like and it wasn't identified as a keyword tag, then you do have a legitimate beef about not being able to avoid reading a theme you didn't like.

This is EXACTLY the same statement I made only in different terms and yet he states I have not the right to make the same statement.

Below is an example of what I wrote from a previous post;

I read one story what was well written about a man who had suspicions his wife was having an affair. He set up an elaborate plan to catch the two together. Everything he did lead the reader to believe there was going to be a confrontation when his fears where realized. It was 3 pages long and it wasn't until the last paragraph, when he saw his wife with another man, that his dick got hard and he masturbated while watching them. That rated him 1* from me and a vow to never read another one of his story.

My point is only, if you're going to write a willing cuckhold story, please label it as such the way I would expect an incest story or any others to be labeled. Those of us who would like to exclude reading certain types of stories do not appreciate being tricked. I'm assuming this author considered the ending to be a "surprise ending," but the very nature of the genre should not be hidden to trap unsuspecting readers.

The problem with LW is that there are two schools of thought on what the label should mean. To some it means willing cuckholding, guys who get off watching their wives with other men. There are some of us who deplore such conduct and feel it is demeaning to men. Unfortunately, separating the two categories does not seem to be on the agenda so we have rely on the author to honestly label the story.

 

[sr71plt]

And MY point was that an adult reader who has a beef with a story like this just moves on to another story. They don't need to whine about it all over the place and declare their precious little sensitivities as having been raped.

Trying to match me with Scouries is pretty stupid, as anyone who has been here for any length of time can tell you. Really going to the bottom of the barrel in your little snit, aren't you? Is this too what you were referring to as an "intelligent" conversation?

 

[nakdsub]

Matching you to scouries is easy...

Since the two of your routinely get their kicks by putting others down in tandem. Your egos appear to be the size of Texas.

Again, it is difficult to carry an intelligent conversation with you, I admit that. Too bad the forum doesn't have webcam. I could talk to you using hand signals and make it much easier for you to understand.

 

[sr71plt]

Since the two of your routinely get their kicks by putting others down in tandem. Your egos appear to be the size of Texas.

Again, it is difficult to carry an intelligent conversation with you, I admit that. Too bad the forum doesn't have webcam. I could talk to you using hand signals and make it much easier for you to understand.

Sorry that dog don't bark. I know you're upset and must find someone else to blame other than yourself.

 

[estragon]

Oh! Just splurged coffee on the keyboard laughing. If the joke was intentional, it was brilliant.

'Cuckold', or rather 'cuckauld', is the old French word for the male cuckoo's mating call. Since the male was forever being 'cuckolded' by his wife leaving eggs in other alpha males' nests the etymology is obvious.

There was a female equivalent word, 'cuckquean', but it never took off, probably because us double- X chromosomes take no prisoners.

Yes, Elfin, it was intended as humor. Glad someone got it. Might be a plot bunny for a "knights of old" story, where the peasant Bertin is cuckolded by the Baron de Coque, who ravishes the lovely Thusnelda, bride of the aforesaid Bertin by virtue (or lack thereof) of the jus primae noctae, and in compensation is awarded a plot in Chambertin, which is leased to him in cuckhold by sign manual.

 

[elfin_odalisque]

No offense, but what has that comparison got to do with anything? At an airport or a bookstore, I can read a summary, which I really see as no different from the tags. You use the summary or blurbs to decide if you like it or not, right? If it starts off telling you about Lady Whoever in Regency England, and you don't like that, then you put it back. How is that different from the tags? All the tags do is tell you what the story contains -- which is what a summary does.



These are two different things. I disagree with the first sentence, or at least I'll ask how it will destroy itself. How does it destroy itself by telling the reader what's inside? And how do tags differ from the categorization here? Those are just general tags when you get to it, and I know what tags I don't like.

I agree, though, that you take your risks on Lit. I've encountered a number of romance stories, for example, that involve a cheating spouse, something I really dislike (except in certain circumstances). So I click off. But if I'd seen the same story on SOL, it likely would have been tagged as such, and I would have avoided it. I'm not mad about finding it on Lit, but the SOL tags would have saved me a little time.

I seriously don't see how the tags are a bad thing.

Yes, but I prefer to choose my stories on a bit of blurb rather than the eponymous and unhelpful tags. Before you start you know you are in an erotica site and you have the categories to guide you.

 

[PennLady]

Yes, but I prefer to choose my stories on a bit of blurb rather than the eponymous and unhelpful tags. Before you start you know you are in an erotica site and you have the categories to guide you.

True, but I still don't see how the tags are a bad thing. Some of them are in fact very helpful. I think Lit doesn't use them as well as they could.

You still haven't answered my question about the difference between a blurb or summary or the tags. If the summary tells you that this woman and this guy will have sex with another guy, and a tag would tell you there's MMF sex -- what's the difference?

 

[Dilly30]

Well that's not exactly what I meant. I read tons of stories on here, and it's not the labeling that is the problem, it's the sheer number of stories that involve cuckolding and loving wives. What other sites have good stories where there is less of that kind of thing? I'm not morally opposed to it or anything, but it doesn't appeal to me.

 

[Dilly30]

PennLady when I see MMF I think it could be any two guys and a girl, not necessarily a husband, another guy and the wife. But there are lots of the latter.

 

[nakdsub]

Dilly...

Lately there seems to be nothing but willing cuckhold stories in LW. I'm surprised at the number because if you look at their scores it shows people really don't like them that much. I've seen some lately scored below a 2. Yet they keep plugging.
Hang in there, hopefully it will turn around and we'll see a rash of unwilling cuckhold stories we can enjoy. ;-)

 

[countryboy001]

nakdsub and dilly

Guys,
This is a VERY weird thread.

Some of your comments:

nakdsub

I made a simple point. If a story is labelled a willing cuckhold story, you have the option to read or not. If you chose to read, then don't complain. My complaint is when a story masks itself as a non-cuckhold story, only to reveal its true nature in the end.

I read one story what was well written about a man who had suspicions his wife was having an affair. He set up an elaborate plan to catch the two together. Everything he did lead the reader to believe there was going to be a confrontation when his fears where realized. It was 3 pages long and it wasn't until the last paragraph, when I saw his wife with another man, that his dick got hard and he masturbated while watching them. That rated him 1* from me and a vow to never read another one of his storie.

dilly30

Well that's not exactly what I meant. I read tons of stories on here, and it's not the labeling that is the problem, it's the sheer number of stories that involve cuckolding and loving wives. What other sites have good stories where there is less of that kind of thing? I'm not morally opposed to it or anything, but it doesn't appeal to me.

nakdsub to dilly
dilly...
Lately there seems to be nothing but willing cuckhold stories in LW. I'm surprised at the number because if you look at their scores it shows people really don't like them that much. I've seen some lately scored below a 2. Yet they keep plugging.
Hang in there, hopefully it will turn around and we'll see a rash of unwilling cuckhold stories we can enjoy. ;-)

===

Sheer number? And you ask why. Well, some like to write them, and there's likely an audience. I've read a number, and enjoyed some of them. Yes, there's a puerility and terrible writing contingent, but I'm not sure it's greater than, say, in incest or 'non-consent.' The 2's that turn up, unfortunately represent guys like you who hate the concept, so, in Loving Wives, the scores often have little to do with quality; axes are being ground.

Nakd wants "unwiling cuckold" stories. Fine, write some and develop your audience. I don't understand your seeming ability to be tricked. You wanted adultery and confrontation, and the juicy details of a 'spying' scene didn't alert you! So you want the jealous husband observer to be NOT hard and jump out and berate (or beat up?) the wife for being a ho? Does that sound like a likely porn or erotica piece to you. Are you gonna jerk off to hubby's outrage?

Or, having witnessed the scene, the hubby plots to have his wife raped by 10 sailors to teach her a lesson? Well, my friend one might ask about your odd tastes.

Lit's a 'free speech' area with hundreds of stories about some fairly odd tastes. They're fantasies. MOST were their colors on their sleeve, from paragraph 1. MAYBE there are some REALLY sneaky crypto cuck stories out there, though no one in the thread has citied any with urls. If you hang out in Loving Wives do you really expect sympathy for the odd time you're 'tricked'? I'm afraid this all comes down to the endless fight over what belongs in "Loving Wives"; it's an odd category, since 'wife fucking others' has several possibilities. Why not find a category with less 'trickery', and keep yourself safe from disappointment?

Everyone has their VERY specific tastes and has to read a hundred stories to find the *right* one. That's the nature of the game, I'm afraid. Peace. Relax. Search. Enjoy.

 

[lovecraft68]

I think there is a lot of them, because it is a turn on to many, but more importantly seems to have a train wreck fascination for people whom they offend.

The trolls blast the shit out of them, but keep reading it's like they can't not read them, then take it out on the author.

So the only category I know of where people hate them yet still read.

 

[Goldeniangel]

Personally I like trying my hand at LW stories because of the fact that they tend to get such mixed reviews. I've gotten to the point where I like trying different plots / character types just to see how they're received. And it's amusing to me how many hypocrites there are that read the stories constantly and then revile them.

But, I def always write a note at the beginning of the story or make sure it says something in the subject if there's cheating and I put the story in something other than the Loving Wives category. I'm not a fan of reading a story in Erotic Couplings and then halfway through finding out that the wife is cheating, etc. There's a reason there's a category for those stories.

 

[sr71plt]

I'm pretty sure that Loving Wives is the cheating wives category at Lit.

 

[Goldeniangel]

I'm pretty sure that Loving Wives is the cheating wives category at Lit.

Are you talking to me? Cuz that's what I was saying =P

 

[nakdsub]

I really don't understand...

What is so damn hard to put a simple, "willing cuckhold," label on a story that is unclear any other way. The LW category is actually 3 categories in one. You have true loving wife stories showing love between a man and his wife. You have cheating wife stories, whether they are reconciliation in the end or not, the husband is unaware of his wife's infidelity until it is discovered. Then we have the third that, in my opinion, completely and totally degrades the male, showing him most of the time humiliated.

I guess I would equate that kind of story with a woman's rape story where she is totally degraded as a person. If a woman chose not to read such a story it should be her prerogative not to do so. I think it would be unfair to her if it were classified in the, "coupling" genre only for her to find out at the end of the story that the woman was raped and degraded.

How about a story in LW describing in detail a man and woman making love only to read at the end of the story, "and that's how her brother fucked her." If a man does not want to read an incest story, he should not have to read one in disguise.

I don't care how many willing cuckhold stories there are. I don't want to read them. To me they are humiliating and degrade me as a man. That's my opinion. I'm not trying to force it on anyone else, just like I don't think anyone should entice me to read a story I don't want to read by cloaking it. I just don't get it. What is so fucking hard about labeling a willing cuckhold story like you would an incest, non-consent, or any other story?

 

[sr71plt]

if there's cheating . . . I put the story in something other than the Loving Wives category.

Oh, I thought this meant that if cheating was involved you put it in something other than the Loving Wives category.