Why so many cuckhold stories?

I'm pretty sure that the Lit. editor shuffles anything into Loving Wives that pops out to her as emphasizing cuckolding. I don't think it's just an author decision; I think it's website categorization policy.
 
Seems the easy thing to do,is once you realize the story is not for you,just click off it. That's what I do. You are not going to change anything whining about it. It's an open and FREE site,and it has mulitple topics to read about,and I enjoy that.
 
In regards to the cuckold/loving wives/gay stuff. I have found that I enjoy stories about wife sharing,and the hubby gets caught up in the whole scene and tries bi sex for the first time,and/or tasting the creampie. Any suggestions about what authors write more about this? Appreciate any tips.
 
"bi" = two. He would be having sex with both sexes.

I know what he meant by Bi, but your answer didnt answer my question, what is BI sex? explain. Is he penetrating someone while being penetrated?
 
I know what he meant by Bi, but your answer didnt answer my question, what is BI sex? explain. Is he penetrating someone while being penetrated?

He means that the husband is experimenting with having sex with both a man and a woman, probably emphasizing the first time man is having sex with another man. "Bi Sex" doesn't refer to a specific act (that I know of, and I'm sure there's a whole lot I don't know of).
 
You asked if he was having sex with a man or a woman. The answer is yes. And I answered the question you asked.
 
You asked if he was having sex with a man or a woman. The answer is yes. And I answered the question you asked.

Well no, I asked Is he with a Man or a Woman, saying YES does not answer that question because it wasnt a yes or no question.

Straight sex = MxF

Gay sex = MxM (FxF)

Bi Sex =

Now before you say, hes having sex with both, in what position was what I meant? Is their two men in a woman? one man in a woman and one in a man? explain!
 
Because where all sad people. it's our universal fetish. It's like how all japanese men are pedophiles!
 
Well no, I asked Is he with a Man or a Woman, saying YES does not answer that question because it wasnt a yes or no question.

Straight sex = MxF

Gay sex = MxM (FxF)

Bi Sex =

Now before you say, hes having sex with both, in what position was what I meant? Is their two men in a woman? one man in a woman and one in a man? explain!

Having "bi sex" doesn't refer to a specific position. I think that's what you may be missing. He could be with both, or one at a time.
 
one at a time.

Thats my point, you can hardly call it BI sex if its one at a time!

My actual complaint was the use of the phrase "bi sex" as it doesnt really refer to anything specific. I think he wanted to impart the idea of dabbling with another man, as in gay sex or something along the lines, but wanted to keep the guys preference at BI even if the act wasnt, and thus used the phrase BI Sex, which Im not quite sure.

Bottom Line, I've always felt that

MxF = straight
FxF & MxM = Gay
MMF / FFM = Threesome and so on. But i've not really ever seen the phrase "bi sex" fit into this category. Was he implying the guy was bi even though he acted in a gay or straight manor, or was he implying a certain act, as in threesome with 2 guys?
 
Right. Lazyhobo just doesn't get the point.

Just as sr said, bisexual, M or F, means swinging both ways but does NOT mean having MFM or FFM group sessions.

There are males and females who are bisexual in that they have sexual feelings for both their own and the opposite sex. This does not mean they are looking for depraved orgies, just emotional relationships with both sexes, usually on a one-to-one basis, with or without sexual congress.

Lazyhobo, I don't think you have understood that bisexual is the fourth category of relationship after gay, lesbian and 'straight'.

In answer to your question, I think that a good many people can find emotional and sexual fulfillment in relationships/encounters with lovers of either sex. In answer to you, I think it is 100% specific and you should expand your horizons regarding the human psyche.
 
Thats my point, you can hardly call it BI sex if its one at a time!

My actual complaint was the use of the phrase "bi sex" as it doesnt really refer to anything specific. I think he wanted to impart the idea of dabbling with another man, as in gay sex or something along the lines, but wanted to keep the guys preference at BI even if the act wasnt, and thus used the phrase BI Sex, which Im not quite sure.

Just as sr said, bisexual, M or F, means swinging both ways but does NOT mean having MFM or FFM group sessions.

There are males and females who are bisexual in that they have sexual feelings for both their own and the opposite sex. This does not mean they are looking for depraved orgies, just emotional relationships with both sexes, usually on a one-to-one basis, with or without sexual congress.

Lazyhobo, I don't think you have understood that bisexual is the fourth category of relationship after gay, lesbian and 'straight'.

In answer to your question, I think that a good many people can find emotional and sexual fulfillment in relationships/encounters with lovers of either sex. In answer to you, I think it is 100% specific and you should expand your horizons regarding the human psyche.

I fully well understand that Bisexual is a category on the level of Straight gay and lesbian, but my point was the misunderstanding of the phrase "Bi Sex". As you can see from my own quoted post, I did ask, perhaps he was using the phrase to describe him dabbling in a more "gay" sexual activity, but the guy in question still had a Bisexual preference, and used the term to denote that while performing a "gay" act, he was in fact bi sexual.

My question was merely asking what he meant by that phrase. Now if someone had merely said what I already thought, he was mentally Bi sexual, that would have done fine. And No, the phrase "bi sex" is not 100% specific. It could merely have meant someone changing from straight / gay to bisexual, or it could have denoted a straight man acting in a certain activity (Threesome / orgy) while remaining his original sexuality while others of the same sex were also engaged. I merely wanted to know which he meant if not both.


Another Note : In answer to my question, you feel that many people can find emotional and sexual fulfillment with people of either sex? That doesnt sound anything like my question, in fact I never questioning if people can find fulfillment in an act or relationship.

Not everything is 100% specific to one as it is to another. If I told a joke here, some may understand instantly, others may require it to be explained.

Now I feel that my knowledge on the human psyche is as much as I need it to be, simply not understanding one phrase does not mean I must "Expand my horizons".
 
It is my least favorite type of story but it seems to creep into all the areas that I like. :/

Back to the topic in question.

Another reason may be that Some writers write what they want. Some write whatever pops into their head. Others write about what is popular at the time.

If people find it popular, then more people will write about it.
 
The whole point is that no one has to read anything here--and that the site is open to a broad range of tastes in writing and reading. You (and some others) just don't seem to be intelligent enough to get that through your pea-sized brains.

You have hit the nail on the head here! I have stopped all feedback on my stories here because of the 'Trolls' who have nothing better to do than abusively complain about the category the story has been posted in. Most of them, I notice, don't or can't write stories of their own anyway, which says a lot about them in the first place!

I am sure all writers here appreciate positive criticism to help them progress but some of the things said in comments are very nasty and destructive - and those don't include the anonymous emails!

You are quite right - no one is forced is read everything here and if a story line is not to your taste don't read it. There are some things I don't like here but I believe in artistic freedom and if someone writes on that subject that is their choice! I choose not to read them, others should do the same.
 
Agreed, with only one addition--that the stories be properly labeled.

Taking a favorite example, if I want to order a martini, I should be able to tell from the drinks menu that it is a martini I am ordering, and that what the glass or carafe contains will be a martini. But if the menu says "martini", and I order a martini, but the glass or carafe that arrives at my place at the bar contains White Zinfandel, I think I have a valid complaint.
 
Agreed, with only one addition--that the stories be properly labeled.

Taking a favorite example, if I want to order a martini, I should be able to tell from the drinks menu that it is a martini I am ordering, and that what the glass or carafe contains will be a martini. But if the menu says "martini", and I order a martini, but the glass or carafe that arrives at my place at the bar contains White Zinfandel, I think I have a valid complaint.

But are you so delicate that you'll melt if you start reading something not included in the labels? This is supposed to be an adult site. Adults are supposed to be able to take care of themselves and handle life's occasional unpleasantries without fainting and raising a stink. Just click out and go read something else. You don't have act like you've been mortally wounded.
 
I was surprised to see this thread still going...

Every time I express myself on this point, I get shot down, but since there seems to be so many viewpoints, I will say it again.
To have Literotica try to subcategorize everything is ridiculous. Most stories contain more than one "sub-category."
What I am looking for is simple courtesy from the authors. When I was submitting stories here I always tried to give a brief synopsis in the form of a prologue, not giving the story away, but giving the potential reader enough info to make a decision on whether he/she wished to read the story.
If you go to a book store and pick out a book in the, "romance," section, is that the only criteria needed to buy the book, because it's labeled, romance? There is always a synopsis included on the inside of the book that a person can read to determine whether they want to plunk down their hard earned money or not.
I just don't see what's so hard, or why it is so unreasonable to ask authors for a little info before the reader invests his or her time.
 
Yep, I'd shoot that down. Lit. provides a title, a brief slug, a category, and tags. Be an adult and take care of yourself beyond that. If you are that squeamish/sensitive, what are you doing reading stories on a porn site?
 
Every time I express myself on this point, I get shot down, but since there seems to be so many viewpoints, I will say it again.
To have Literotica try to subcategorize everything is ridiculous. Most stories contain more than one "sub-category."
What I am looking for is simple courtesy from the authors. When I was submitting stories here I always tried to give a brief synopsis in the form of a prologue, not giving the story away, but giving the potential reader enough info to make a decision on whether he/she wished to read the story.
If you go to a book store and pick out a book in the, "romance," section, is that the only criteria needed to buy the book, because it's labeled, romance? There is always a synopsis included on the inside of the book that a person can read to determine whether they want to plunk down their hard earned money or not.
I just don't see what's so hard, or why it is so unreasonable to ask authors for a little info before the reader invests his or her time.

Hi NS.

I think the easiest solution would be for the tags for a story to appear higher on the first page, as opposed to low on the last. This is one thing I think SOL does that is an advantage -- instead of categories, you check off all tags that apply from a list. It's not perfect, as I'm sure there's always a tag you need that isn't there, but it would help in cases like this.

I don't think you can really compare the stories here to books in a book store. This is all free, and amateur, and everything else. To play devil's advocate, why should I put in a prologue? Not every story needs or should have one. I'm writing my stories because I have ideas and I want to see things play out in a certain way. If readers enjoy it, then that's excellent. If not, well, I can't write for everyone.

I think what I don't like about your argument is the idea that the onus should be on the author to "warn" the reader. If the reader is seriously concerned about reading something which will offend them somehow, then the reader needs to take a more active role in figuring out what the story is about. On this site, you get a title, a tagline, a category and a list of tags (if the author provides some, I know, and I don't think they're in a good or convenient place) with a story. That should be enough to start.

Even with synopses and tags, you take a chance. I've started a number of stories that I clicked off of, for example, when I realized that one of the characters was cheating on a spouse, despite it being in romance or EC. So I just go on. I don't resent any time spent reading -- after all, I didn't have to click on it.

PL
 
I think the whole LW category should be dissolved and turned into tags.

The whole section is riddled with so many hateful homophobic idiots that actively seek out stories they don't like, it's bizarre. It's clear they feel some curious need to stand up for their biggoted view of masculinity.

If you have to put a disclaimer at the beginning of every story you treat people like idiots. Really, they're free stories. If you want a blurb (and book covers don't provide a synopsis, if they did they'd be accused of spoilers) go to Amazon and download the often free books there.
 
Last edited:
Max...

Actually, since pulling my stories from here, I've had several published at Amazon and they require a short synopsis for every story, as does Smashwords, who even provides optional space for a more thorough synopsis if the author wishes to provide one.

It simply makes good sense to inform the perspective reader what the story is about, even if he isn't paying to read it. It certainly could stop, at least some of the hateful comments from readers who thought they were reading one kind of a story, only to be blindsided at the end.

I agree, after publishing over 30, Loving Wives, stories here, there are always going to be those who will spill their hateful comments no matter what, but there is also a good number who would simply pass on a story if given the information needed to make a decision.
 
OK, nobody's stopping you from doing it. After a while report back on how the reception of your stories has changed. The website is not likely to change its format, and authors can include such defensive babysittting blurbs if they wish. So, it's the authors you need to convince to do it--and then to show that it actually makes any difference.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top