Banning Clarification

How creepy that you would pull up something from years ago to make a point?? :confused:

It’s been so long that I didn’t even remember making that post that I backtracked the link to make sure you hadn’t made it up.

Just searched for "method acting". I was looking for his "GB is a new blank canvas each day" post TBH.
 
Well ... It's a private web site. The owners can ban anyone they want for whatever reason.
The owners are as entitledas anyone else to exercise their rights in respect to their property without regard to your imagined rights to use their platform as the launching pad for whatever brain fart you might have.
They don't have explain or justify themselves to you. Just accept that you live in a free society.
This is not unreasonable. In the current context, it's actually somewhat enlightened.I then would suggest that anyone should have access to redact any personal content offered into the greater enterprise. To be able to collect their once offered content and take it elsewhere? We are talking copyright and ownership and fair use and all kinds of murky weirdness. There are a number of once contributors who might just go should they be given access once more to their... copywritten content.
 
This is not unreasonable. In the current context, it's actually somewhat enlightened.I then would suggest that anyone should have access to redact any personal content offered into the greater enterprise. To be able to collect their once offered content and take it elsewhere? We are talking copyright and ownership and fair use and all kinds of murky weirdness. There are a number of once contributors who might just go should they be given access once more to their... copywritten content.

STFU.
 
Laurelle should try shadowbanning. More drama!

Actually.... she should sell to someone who actually can craft the know how now to monetize it in today's market. Or she/it can ride the old sting ray to it's ever approaching e-death... Worth more sold to a new hungry cunt.
 
This is not unreasonable. In the current context, it's actually somewhat enlightened.I then would suggest that anyone should have access to redact any personal content offered into the greater enterprise. To be able to collect their once offered content and take it elsewhere? We are talking copyright and ownership and fair use and all kinds of murky weirdness. There are a number of once contributors who might just go should they be given access once more to their... copywritten content.

I'm sure the owners would be happy to release it to them once the copyright holder provides varifiable evidence, published on the site, of full name, dob, current address and all alts previously used.
 
I'm sure the owners would be happy to release it to them once the copyright holder provides varifiable evidence, published on the site, of full name, dob, current address and all alts previously used.

If they need the IP address, have them check with Ishmael.
 
I'm sure the owners would be happy to release it to them once the copyright holder provides varifiable evidence, published on the site, of full name, dob, current address and all alts previously used.
Where is the sign up list? Oh.... irony face palm! I should consult an e-lawyer, yo.... riiiiight?
 
If Laurel chose to she could apply rule 12 with a bit more vigour and move a mountain of crap to the Politics Board. Personally I would like her to be even less predictable and ban folks just because she feels like it.

More seriously, there is an increasing trend for politicians /lawyers to go after sites and site facilitators because of their alleged nefarious content. Laurel and Manu would obviously be aware of that trend and we can anticipate stricter policing of content in future. Can't blame them for protecting themselves.
 
You have no fucking clue what it's like to truly be trolled. :)



Well, you gave it the old college try. :rose:


But when you’re fake, bertie-ann, you have that bullshit, one-dimensional image to maintain, and real folks just don’t give a shit. You’re not relevant. :)

Probably why you had to resort to faking an illness, and posting photos of a poster’s deceased relative.
 
Well, you gave it the old college try. :rose:


But when you’re fake, bertie-ann, you have that bullshit, one-dimensional image to maintain, and real folks just don’t give a shit. You’re not relevant. :)

Probably why you had to resort to faking an illness, and posting photos of a poster’s deceased relative.

This self-appointed refereeing made more sense when it was done by Adjudicator. Whatever happened to that one?
 
It's "copyrighted" (right to copy), not "copywritten." Just saying. Carry on . . . and on . . . and on.

Thank you, Habu... Believe it or not, there was a conscious intent to invoke Liam in that part of the message. There has been a smattering of Liam levied at many walls today. Still, your criticism is noted. The 2nd ed. will be... gooder.
 
Just don't ban anyone with huge tatas...it would bring about a great disturbance in the force.
 
Thank you, Habu... Believe it or not, there was a conscious intent to invoke Liam in that part of the message. There has been a smattering of Liam levied at many walls today. Still, your criticism is noted. The 2nd ed. will be... gooder.

Well, OK. There's so much "who is really who?" being slung around that it's given me a headache. I stopped trying to keep that roster here years ago.
 
This self-appointed refereeing made more sense when it was done by Adjudicator. Whatever happened to that one?



I don’t know what happened to Adjudicator. One of yours?


Maybe ask que, he seems to think he knows a great deal about everything. :D
 
I don’t know what happened to Adjudicator. One of yours?


Maybe ask que, he seems to think he knows a great deal about everything. :D

Why are you here? Why did you create two separate trolling-dedicated alts the same day, Shadwell36 and Shadwell41? Why did you anticipate before you were even banned as Shadwell 36 that you were going to need a spare? How many more spares do you have?

Who are you, when you are not endlessly involving yourself in other people's disputes? Other than endlessly inserting yourself in every long-standing a dispute on the board how do you see yourself contributing to this place?

How do you go from using this as an obvious troll art to chirping along with posters as if you have some sort of connection with anybody here under this obvious troll alt? Either they all know who you are which is fine, and which case why can't you just use your root account or they don't have any idea who the f*** you are so why are you chirping along with them like you've known them for ages?
 
Why are you here? Why did you create two separate trolling-dedicated alts the same day, Shadwell36 and Shadwell41? Why did you anticipate before you were even banned as Shadwell 36 that you were going to need a spare? How many more spares do you have?

Who are you, when you are not endlessly involving yourself in other people's disputes? Other than endlessly inserting yourself in every long-standing a dispute on the board how do you see yourself contributing to this place?

How do you go from using this as an obvious troll art to chirping along with posters as if you have some sort of connection with anybody here under this obvious troll alt? Either they all know who you are which is fine, and which case why can't you just use your root account or they don't have any idea who the f*** you are so why are you chirping along with them like you've known them for ages?

Who are you?
 
Back
Top