Be as boring as possible.

Stores have candy, so you could check there, yes. It would be a way to "confirm" the incident I am discussing. Another would be to search the Internet for results. But I don't think you could really disprove it in that manner, because it could still be out there "in the world" somewhere. (I am putting this sentence in later, in an editing mode, because I just wanted to say that it IS "in the world.") Another way would be to call the makers of Swedish Fish, although whether that is in Sweden, I do not know. I was going to say "if they were fish, too, I do not know," but I decided not to, because that would be silly. It just would. In any event, good luck on your search for whether this is true or not, although I know it is true, because I have witnessed it for myself, in the "here and now."

My comment was not to question if what you posted was accurate or not. I was only curious to see the candy.
 
I like my shirts and socks inside out so the seams do not rub me.

I do not.

(I mean, I do not like those inside out. On me. Not your shirts and socks - mine. Also, I was not talking about the fact that I "do not like rubbing you." I would not know if I would like it or not, although that is not what I meant.)

Ah, the joy of socks.

I do not have a thing for feet. Like, a "feetish," or whatever. I just don't really care. I do sort of enjoy giving a foot rub, but it is not like an arousal thing.

But anyway, I liked your humorous "play on word-concept meanings."
 
I do not.

(I mean, I do not like those inside out. On me. Not your shirts and socks - mine. Also, I was not talking about the fact that I "do not like rubbing you." I would not know if I would like it or not, although that is not what I meant.)



I do not have a thing for feet. Like, a "feetish," or whatever. I just don't really care. I do sort of enjoy giving a foot rub, but it is not like an arousal thing.

But anyway, I liked your humorous "play on word-concept meanings."

Darn you, for being so annoyingly boring.
 
My comment was not to question if what you posted was accurate or not. I was only curious to see the candy.

I am sorry that I misunderstood your meaning. I try to understand, and take the intended meaning from sayings of people. Sometimes, these things are not understood as well as they might be. I hope in the future we can be friends.
 
I am sorry that I misunderstood your meaning. I try to understand, and take the intended meaning from sayings of people. Sometimes, these things are not understood as well as they might be. I hope in the future we can be friends.

You are so right. Words are very easily misunderstood in postings, e-mails, etc. No harm done.

Of course we can be friends. :)
 
I do not.

(I mean, I do not like those inside out. On me. Not your shirts and socks - mine. Also, I was not talking about the fact that I "do not like rubbing you." I would not know if I would like it or not, although that is not what I meant.)

1+ 1 = 2
 
I just got out of body pump (trying not to stare at the avatar above me, not so boring)
 
Are these boring ellipses, or exciting ellipses?

Neither. An ellipsis has only three periods (unlike many people who use ellipses, who seem to have one quite periodically for a long time, or a school day, which can sometimes have as many as nine).
 
like this one...? :confused:

“We are driven by five genetic needs: survival, love and belonging, power, freedom, and fun.” ~ William Glasser

Yes. Much too exciting. Particularly because it causes me to dive for Wikipedia and further research to find out why he left out the drive for coffee.
 
Back
Top