Being autistic, adhd and random stuff

They've made no secret of pinching the idea from the French series, Astrid and Raphaelle. The main difference - and a big one - is that the UK version is played by an autistic woman, while the French one isn't.

Having seen both, I can see why the Astrid is popular, because the crime plots have more drama, have some more steamy affairs, but I found their central actor off-putting. I felt she was performing a pastiche of autism and could almost hear her autism coaches pushing her to add more vocal and physical ticks in her portrayal.

By contrast, Patience has a lighter touch. She still has the occasional shutdown and red lines that people keep trampling over, but her reactions felt human, not the mechanical ones shown by Astrid. One might almost expect to see a large key in the back of Astrid where they wind her up each day.

But as I say, Astrid is popular, sub-titled but I've seen commenters shouting in outrage that the UK version is a rip-off and 'How dare they?' and 'I prefer ground coffee, not Nescafe, so there!' You get the picture. :) I finish the Patience episodes feeling happy, not tense.
I can imagine that many in the entertainment industry would miss the fact that for many of us autism (and ADHD, etc.) is actually subtle and pervasive rather than immediately obvious. After all, they are trying to tell a story to what is very often a not particularly subtle audience.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the detailed reply, @stickygirl, much appreciate it. I had known of the series just in passing and i don't watch TV a lot. But your write up has piqued my curiosity on the UK version. I am not surprised that their entertainment industry has more options for neuro-divergent performers, I remember seeing a few excellent series with outstanding performances.
 
Judging by the trail of wreckage my AuDHD has been messing with me badly this week. Apparently I forgot to send a set of class notes out, and sent an assignment to the wrong group. Dead embarrassing, but nothing admin is going to shit-a-brick about because I found it reasonably quickly.

Still haven't dealt with the phone company.

Now having trouble with the insurance folks over a piece of inherited property overseas. I used to be able to pay the bill using the debit card, but now I am going to have to do it BACS - which is a hassle.

Right now, I have a compulsive urge to fix the basement window that has been stuck for the last six months.
 
I read a clever twist on a well-trod meme: vaccines cause autism. Someone had turned it on its head... you guessed it - given the number of people in science then, autism causes vaccines.
:)
I was wondering how long they could go without someone turning that well-worn trope on its head. Now we know!

I did get the insurance thing taken care of... Still haven't got to the phone company. Today has been a stresser. It was supposed to be a chase-around-and-tidy-stuff-up-day, but it ended up being lunch-with-the-wife's-granddaughter-because-it-is-her-birthday-day. This utterly derailed the plan because it was an early lunch that cut into my work day, but maybe I will have a second wind and get some of it done late this afternoon. I hate 11:30am or Noon appointments because they heavily impact my morning.

PM
 
Last edited:
I read a clever twist on a well-trod meme: vaccines cause autism. Someone had turned it on its head... you guessed it - given the number of people in science then, autism causes vaccines.
:)
Whoever that is gets an Anthy gold star. Fuck, that's great. My thought when you said it was that only people who hadn't gotten vaccinated became autistic, but that's much better.
 
I see the right wind (sic) press ( ie The Press ) is getting its teeth stuck into Autism and ADHD now. Perhaps Uta ( crazy and past it ) Frith has opened the door to scepticism and scapegoating. The latest claim from her is that TV presenter Chris Packham is not autistic, when the entire UK public knows that, patently, he is: he obsessive, arrogant, blunt, lives on his own miles from civilisation and counts leaves on trees for fun and a tireless advocate for everything environmental.
So yeah, not content with attacking everything trans ( which is probably becoming a bit stale as a topic now ) the gutter press is having a pop at neurodivergent folk, or as Frith claims, people with imaginary mental health issues. Are they all out to get me?!
I also saw New Scientist have an article about autism in women ( apparently women are different!!! ) but it was a dangled carrot asking you to subscribe so I passed over the link. If anyone subscribes and can post a copy here ( wow - copyright infringement huh? ) then I'd be grateful to read how I'm not trans, a woman or autistic!! Can't wait!
 
Last edited:
I see the right wind (sic) press ( ie The Press ) is getting its teeth stuck into Autism and ADHD now. Perhaps Uta ( crazy and past it ) Frith has opened the door to scepticism and scapegoating. The latest claim from her is that TV presenter Chris Packham is not autistic, when the entire UK public knows that, patently, he is: he obsessive, arrogant, blunt, lives on his own miles from civilisation and counts leaves on trees for fun and a tireless advocate for everything environmental.
So yeah, not content with attacking everything trans ( which is probably becoming a bit stale as a topic now ) the gutter press is having a pop at neurodivergent folk, or as Frith claims, people with imaginary mental health issues. Are they all out to get me?!
I also saw New Scientist have an article about autism in women ( apparently women are different!!! ) but it was a dangled carrot asking you to subscribe so I passed over the link. If anyone subscribes and can post a copy here ( wow - copyright infringement huh? ) then I'd be grateful to read how I'm not trans, a woman or autistic!! Can't wait!
I get similar treatment here from mods and other litsters who claim to be neurodivergent and yet because my divergence differs from theirs I'm 'fake autistic' or whatever even though they describe me in exactly the same terms as Mr Packham (above), and I'm simply weaponising neuro-divergence for my own ends.
Small world, isn't it?
 
Perhaps Uta ( crazy and past it ) Frith
I just recently watched someone tear apart her editorial in a scientific magazine meticulously. Just a minute.... Here it is:

Someone in the comments speculated that she might, in fact, be dementing. She's 85 and the editorial has gaping holes in the logic. Another pointed out that even the research she did decades ago has only done harm....

Yes, this is actually one of those where reading the comment section is fine.
 
I just recently watched someone tear apart her editorial in a scientific magazine meticulously. Just a minute.... Here it is:

Someone in the comments speculated that she might, in fact, be dementing. She's 85 and the editorial has gaping holes in the logic. Another pointed out that even the research she did decades ago has only done harm....

Yes, this is actually one of those where reading the comment section is fine.
How funny - I popped by to link that YouTube video, which I found excellent.
 
I think the old girl's cheese is sliding off her cracker. It happens to most of us eventually. But there is a deeper problem in that we tend as a society to try and treat science as a religion, and to some degree religion as science with the result we can, and do, get both of them awfully wrong. The response to COVID-19 in both the USA and UK was a masterpiece of both scientific and political ineptitude, whereas Sweden got it largely right.

Anyhow, I get a little bit frustrated with folks who try to deny the reality of certain conditions such as Autism and AD[H]D, but perhaps even more frustrated with those who want to turn them into diseases so that Big Pharma can find "treatments" and cash in. I looked at the history of the main ADHD medication for adults - Adderall - and found out it started out as a slimming aid in the 1930s being a low dose version of Hitler's Happy Pill, and was repurposed c. 1990 when someone observed it could be used to quiet ADHD. When medication was offered for my ADHD the thought that occurred to me was, "do I want to be on progressively larger doses of amphetamine?" Answer, "No." The other catch was that treating the ADHD would make the ASD more noticeable, so - erm... This is not to say that that approach is not right for some people, but I decided to pass.

Anyhow, I had a look at what the sensible alternative medicine folks were saying, and embraced the supplements route to calm the ADHD. It took me about a year to do the research - actually, about 6 months to decide that my ADHD had become a problem and then about 6 months to do the reading, and my conclusion was ASD-me can cope with the regimen, so let's give it a whirl. Again, this approach is not for everyone, but I have noticed I am just a little bit calmer, and a little bit more focussed, and that is really all that I am looking for. I still want to be me, not a drugged up Zombie.

I am also coming to terms with the fact that "AuDHD" does colour every aspect of my life, even sex, so stop being angry about it, and get on with life. Being ND does have some benefits, and I chose a career where the negative traits are less of a nuisance, and the positive ones a benefit, so that is all good. Personal relationships are something I'll be working on until I drop, unfortunately.

Sorry - bit of a random rant, but I am prone to those. Now what was it I was supposed to be talking about...?
 
Last edited:
I think the old girl's cheese is sliding off her cracker. It happens to most of us eventually. But there is a deeper problem in that we tend as a society to try and treat science as a religion, and to some degree religion as science with the result we can, and do, get both of them awfully wrong. The response to COVID-19 in both the USA and UK was a masterpiece of both scientific and political ineptitude, whereas Sweden got it largely right.

Anyhow, I get a little bit frustrated with folks who try to deny the reality of certain conditions such as Autism and AD[H]D, but perhaps even more frustrated with those who want to turn them into diseases so that Big Pharma can find "treatments" and cash in. I looked at the history of the main ADHD medication for adults - Adderall - and found out it started out as a slimming aid in the 1930s being a low dose version of Hitler's Happy Pill, and was repurposed c. 1990 when someone observed it could be used to quiet ADHD. When medication was offered for my ADHD the thought that occurred to me was, "do I want to be on progressively larger doses of amphetamine?" Answer, "No." The other catch was that treating the ADHD would make the ASD more noticeable, so - erm... This is not to say that that approach is not right for some people, but I decided to pass.

Anyhow, I had a look at what the sensible alternative medicine folks were saying, and embraced the supplements route to calm the ADHD. It took me about a year to do the research - actually, about 6 months to decide that my ADHD had become a problem and then about 6 months to do the reading, and my conclusion was ASD-me can cope with the regimen, so let's give it a whirl. Again, this approach is not for everyone, but I have noticed I am just a little bit calmer, and a little bit more focussed, and that is really all that I am looking for. I still want to be me, not a drugged up Zombie.

I am also coming to terms with the fact that "AuDHD" does colour every aspect of my life, even sex, so stop being angry about it, and get on with life. Being ND does have some benefits, and I chose a career where the negative traits are less of a nuisance, and the positive ones a benefit, so that is all good. Personal relationships are something I'll be working on until I drop, unfortunately.

Sorry - bit of a random rant, but I am prone to those. Now what was it I was supposed to be talking about...?
What supplements?
 
So now I'm waiting on everyone's thoughts about the adhd diagnosis boom programme on BBC Radio 4 this evening...
 
I think the old girl's cheese is sliding off her cracker. It happens to most of us eventually. But there is a deeper problem in that we tend as a society to try and treat science as a religion, and to some degree religion as science with the result we can, and do, get both of them awfully wrong. The response to COVID-19 in both the USA and UK was a masterpiece of both scientific and political ineptitude, whereas Sweden got it largely right.

Gonna have to disagree with you here.

Sweden relied on the US to protect its population with the vaccine our scientists created. So let’s get that out of the way.

Sweden abandoned its elderly and sick in the name of capitalism. If you’re not immunocompromised or elderly, it was fine.

Additionally, you cannot compare the US to any developed country because our health system is shit. We are the most diverse country on the planet with the least access to quality health care for everyone in the developed world. Most deaths in the US early on were lower income and poor people, which Sweden doesn’t have.

Just throwing that out there. Even if you believe in alternative medicine, the elderly and sick were a eugenics project for the Swedes.
 
So now I'm waiting on everyone's thoughts about the adhd diagnosis boom programme on BBC Radio 4 this evening...
I haven't caught up with it, but the July 29 Channel 4 tv program airing the ADHD Myth shoots itself in the head with its own title. It has been hammered by medical professionals since.
I'm guessing the Radio 4 program is trying to make sense of all the conspiracy theories. I have zero trust in anything coming out of the UK media these days. Dunno what brand of KoolAid they're chugging.
 
I haven't caught up with it, but the July 29 Channel 4 tv program airing the ADHD Myth shoots itself in the head with its own title. It has been hammered by medical professionals since.
I'm guessing the Radio 4 program is trying to make sense of all the conspiracy theories. I have zero trust in anything coming out of the UK media these days. Dunno what brand of KoolAid they're chugging.
I often wonder if the drug manufacturers have an agenda to discredit ND conditions in order to have excuses for further promoting their out of favour damn SSRI's/snake oils
 
I often wonder if the drug manufacturers have an agenda to discredit ND conditions in order to have excuses for further promoting their out of favour damn SSRI's/snake oils
I heard nothing spoken in that radio show about drugs or drug companies ( though I admit 40 minutes in, I was tired of listening to the useless interviewer and his two invited guests ). The discussion was initially around the controversial title of the Ch4 Prog "The Great ADHD Myth" .... not that they were rage-baiting at all.

I have teaching friends and have winced to hear them being dismissive of children because 'Blimey, they're so obviously ADHD' . I think the problem lies in teacher training and a proscribed exam-orientated curriculum, where entire schools are down-graded because kids didn't meet national standards. Teachers are under pressure to meet those standards and IMO are too quick to reach for a 'disability sticker' as a means of excusing their inability of helping kids who struggle in classroom environments.

In the radio show, we hear from a young woman, diagnosed ADHD at 23yrs old who is asked to describe her day-to-day symptoms and her list sounded conspicuously normal. What we didn't get to hear is how it impacts on her quality of life. In the same way, autistic people can often make it through each working day, provided they can make it to the finish line and safety of home to decompress. The solution to both those isn't expensive accommodations, or quiet rooms but understanding managers who value their employees as people, not as box-shaped automatons.

When the media get involved in medical issues, they do a quick Wiki search, ask for bite-sized opinions from a couple of professors and reckon they can make meaningful editorial decisions. All we end up with is word-slop and clickbait. It does nothing to alleviate problems and the tired old 'but surely it's something we need to discuss' is the fuckwit stupidity we have to put up with all day from neurotypicals.... bless their little hearts. ;)
 
I heard nothing spoken in that radio show about drugs or drug companies ( though I admit 40 minutes in, I was tired of listening to the useless interviewer and his two invited guests ). The discussion was initially around the controversial title of the Ch4 Prog "The Great ADHD Myth" .... not that they were rage-baiting at all.

I have teaching friends and have winced to hear them being dismissive of children because 'Blimey, they're so obviously ADHD' . I think the problem lies in teacher training and a proscribed exam-orientated curriculum, where entire schools are down-graded because kids didn't meet national standards. Teachers are under pressure to meet those standards and IMO are too quick to reach for a 'disability sticker' as a means of excusing their inability of helping kids who struggle in classroom environments.

In the radio show, we hear from a young woman, diagnosed ADHD at 23yrs old who is asked to describe her day-to-day symptoms and her list sounded conspicuously normal. What we didn't get to hear is how it impacts on her quality of life. In the same way, autistic people can often make it through each working day, provided they can make it to the finish line and safety of home to decompress. The solution to both those isn't expensive accommodations, or quiet rooms but understanding managers who value their employees as people, not as box-shaped automatons.

When the media get involved in medical issues, they do a quick Wiki search, ask for bite-sized opinions from a couple of professors and reckon they can make meaningful editorial decisions. All we end up with is word-slop and clickbait. It does nothing to alleviate problems and the tired old 'but surely it's something we need to discuss' is the fuckwit stupidity we have to put up with all day from neurotypicals.... bless their little hearts. ;)
Forgive me please for being too brief previously. The point that I wanted to make, in support of your previous post, and the comment regarding trust, was that I also have become conditioned to be immediately suspicious of possible financial motives when it comes to such debates. Like, who is on the make here? I've mentioned commercial interests previously with regards to your Pride post. Coincidentally I note that Manchestet Pride has gone into liquidation recently, because commercial and political sponsors have decided to withdraw, due to concerns that LGBQIA+ association might not be such a shrewd business/political concept any more.
Is it any wonder that I'm automatically inclined to seek the money angle in every debate?
As for everything else that you say in this post, I'm tempted to agree entirely.
 
I haven't caught up with it, but the July 29 Channel 4 tv program airing the ADHD Myth shoots itself in the head with its own title. It has been hammered by medical professionals since.
I'm guessing the Radio 4 program is trying to make sense of all the conspiracy theories. I have zero trust in anything coming out of the UK media these days. Dunno what brand of KoolAid they're chugging.
The cheap stuff with lots of nasty chemicals in it.
 
Gonna have to disagree with you here.

Sweden relied on the US to protect its population with the vaccine our scientists created. So let’s get that out of the way.

Sweden abandoned its elderly and sick in the name of capitalism. If you’re not immunocompromised or elderly, it was fine.

Additionally, you cannot compare the US to any developed country because our health system is shit. We are the most diverse country on the planet with the least access to quality health care for everyone in the developed world. Most deaths in the US early on were lower income and poor people, which Sweden doesn’t have.

Just throwing that out there. Even if you believe in alternative medicine, the elderly and sick were a eugenics project for the Swedes.
Most deaths in the us were the elderly living in senior housing of one sort or another.
 
Most deaths in the us were the elderly living in senior housing of one sort or another.
And a lot of them were service workers with no protection, mostly lower income and minority. Sweden offered no protection to the elderly as a policy choice.

America offered no protection to a huge segment of workers as an economic reality.
 
Something that gets forgotten in the retrospective mud-slinging regarding covid, is that it spread so fast and had an unknown mortality rate. We didn't know how fast it would morph, we didn't know which demographics were at risk and we didn't even know how to protect key workers from infection.
In the UK it was immediately apparent that we had no stockpile of PPE protection and many western countries bought their way to the front of the queue for supplies. In the UK, there is plenty of hindsight anger about the social lockdowns ( "Totally unnecessary!!!" "An assault on freedom!!" ) but equally angry about the botched relaxation of distancing "Eat out to Help out" that encouraged people desperate for Pork-loin-chassuer served on a bed of quail wings, to go and catch covid at their local restaurant.
One might like to think that next time - and we're assured there will be another exotic virus resulting from Chinese people eating raw purple frog hearts or tiger testicles - next time, we'll be better prepared. We won't. We won't because it's too expensive and everything is about short-term political goals.
Oh and since the thread is about autism+ can I blame NTs for Everything?! ;)

ETA
/rant
I just searched and there is a purple frog. At the time of ranting I imagined a purple frog was a fiction, which I chose for humorous ( okay sarcastic ) effect. Don't go eating the frogs though, please.
 
Last edited:
"can I blame NTs for Everything?! ;)"
Well youre
Something that gets forgotten in the retrospective mud-slinging regarding covid, is that it spread so fast and had an unknown mortality rate. We didn't know how fast it would morph, we didn't know which demographics were at risk and we didn't even know how to protect key workers from infection.
In the UK it was immediately apparent that we had no stockpile of PPE protection and many western countries bought their way to the front of the queue for supplies. In the UK, there is plenty of hindsight anger about the social lockdowns ( "Totally unnecessary!!!" "An assault on freedom!!" ) but equally angry about the botched relaxation of distancing "Eat out to Help out" that encouraged people desperate for Pork-loin-chassuer served on a bed of quail wings, to go and catch covid at their local restaurant.
One might like to think that next time - and we're assured there will be another exotic virus resulting from Chinese people eating raw purple frog hearts or tiger testicles - next time, we'll be better prepared. We won't. We won't because it's too expensive and everything is about short-term political goals.
Oh and since the thread is about autism+ can I blame NTs for Everything?! ;)
Well youre already blaming the Chinese peoples for the next pandemic, so why not?
 
Back
Top