Censoring Stories: Incorrect Perception It is Generated by AI (Big Brother is Alive & Well)

[EmilyMiller]

Thanks your for the comment, However your comment is not entirely correct. I do know authors that sell works of fiction for a living that use AI. I was just following the methods from people established as published authors use.

And you can’t use them here, what is so hard to understand? Go publish somewhere else. At this point you are exhibiting troll-like qualities. Just read the many responses.

 

[SindeeM]

You’ve never read Orwell, have you?

You can assume anything you like. As I said, I do this as a hobby, I am not a polished author. What I did was point out censorship, The moderator can censor anything they choose and do not have to have a reason. I was pointing out that they claim to be open minded but apparently not for everyting which they can do. I read only book by Orwell.

 

[EmilyMiller]

What I did was point out censorship,

You pointed out your lack of understanding of what censorship is. And you doubled and tripled down on it. You are not being being censored. You have no right to publish here that is being infringed. You have no right to dictate site policy (believe me, I’d like to in other areas). By continuing to misuse the word ‘censor’ you are defeating your own arguments and seeming foolish.

Either that or you just get off on pointless arguments. That happens a lot around here too.

 

[SindeeM]

Governments or religious bodies censor. This is a private site and they can do what the fuck they like. You have no rights which you can exercise here. If you don’t like the policy, don’t publish here.
And no one gets pinged for using Google Search AI lookups, unless you copy and paste what it brings back. I try to go to the actual source, but for non-crucial stuff I might say, OK that’s good enough. No one gets their work rejected for how they searched for stuff.

I appreciate respect that you have an opinion, but you just made many assumptions that are not correct. You had a statement that assumed I did a copy and paste which is not correct. I would caution about making statements where you don't have the data to backup your assertions. Statements without data is an opinion and everyone has one. I personally try to refrain from using terms like the F word.

 

[EmilyMiller]

You had a statement that assumed I did a copy and paste which is not correct.

I said, and I quote:

unless you copy and paste what it brings back.

Unless is a conditional, try Googling it.

 

[BeechLeaf]

I personally try to refrain from using terms like the F word.

Welcome to the world's largest repository of sex stories. Feel free to look around.

 

[SindeeM]

And people make money reselling stuff from Temu, too. just a matter of whether quality matters or not.

I agree with that. In fact I agree with most of the comments. My point is why not let the readers decide what is quality? Just like in the commercial world if readers don't like it they will not consume it.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Just like in the commercial world if readers don't like it they will not consume it.

This is not how the commercial world works, else Random House would be publishing kiddie porn and snuff. You are making appeals that have no basis in fact.

At this point your troll factor has exceeded my threshold, so have fun ranting.

 

[SindeeM]

I said, and I quote:

Unless is a conditional, try Googling it.

I appreciate your opinion. I have received feedback from users that they like the stories. For me I am going to use a forum that does not censor based on an incorrect assumption that AI is writing my stories. The moderators never define in any objective manner how they determine what is created by AI. I had two stories published and three that were rejected the same method of writing. I am pointing out there is inconsistency in logic. How can I modify my writing method if even they are not consistent in their own evaluation criteria?

 

[EmilyMiller]

For me I am going to use a forum that does not censor based on an incorrect assumption that AI is writing my stories.

Good luck then. Bye.

 

[SindeeM]

Just like you have no right to tell Barnes and Nobel what books they carry on their shelves, you have no right to dictate to this site what they should/must publish.

the comment comment regarding my post is my opinion is not entirely correct. I had two stories that were published and three that were rejected using the same writing method. That is called data and supports the theory that there is inconsistent criteria used for rejecting stories

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

My point is why not let the readers decide what is quality? Just like in the commercial world if readers don't like it they will not consume it.

This is one of the longest surviving websites on the net. Trust them. They know what they're doing.


You're free to start a competitor if you wish.

 

[StillStunned]

The moderators have lost sight of the purpose of the written word regardless of where or how it is generated.

I'd actually say that, by refusing to publish anything generated by a probability-based plagiarism-driven autocomplete machine, they're defending the written word and its purpose.

If you want to champion the use of AI, here probably isn't the best place: a gathering of writers who are watching their hobby - in some cases their livelihoods - being undermined by something that's so blatantly illegal, manifestly not fit for purpose and unashamedly killing the planet while it fills the pockets of a tiny elite.

Nobody is saying that you can't use AI to write stories. You do you. But when you're in someone's house, you abide by their rules. If you visit someone and they ask you not to smoke indoors, do you rant about being persecuted? If you visit a Jewish or Muslim friend, do you complain about not being served pork? Find somewhere else to have a cigarette, to eat bacon, or to proclaim how wonderful AI is.

 

[jsmiam]

Thanks your for the comment, However your comment is not entirely correct. I do know authors that sell works of fiction for a living that use AI. I was just following the methods from people established as published authors use.

Correct, that is why I did not use AI to write the stories. Again, everyone is making my points for me..

Did you or did you not use ai?

You’re making two points for yourself. Pick one.

you wanna rant, rant. There’s a point where replying is pointless.

 

[onehitwanda]

[citation needed]

 

[Five_Inch_Heels]

Nobody is saying that you can't use AI to write stories. You do you. But when you're in someone's house, you abide by their rules. If you visit someone and they ask you not to smoke indoors, do you rant about being persecuted? If you visit a Jewish or Muslim friend, do you complain about not being served pork? Find somewhere else to have a cigarette, to eat bacon, or to proclaim how wonderful AI is.

Two of those aren't accurate comparisons, because people often rant and rave about those things and in some cases even intentionally violate laws.

 

[EmilyMiller]

View attachment 2595099

 

[onehitwanda]

View attachment 2595102

 

[Djmac1031]

Correct, that is why I did not use AI to write the stories.

I do know authors that sell works of fiction for a living that use AI. I was just following the methods from people established as published authors use.

I used the same exact method for those stories that I use for the rejected ones.

So I'm very confused because your statements seem to contradict each other.

Do you or do you not use AI generated text IN your stories?

If YES, then there's your problem.

If NO, then you'd need to reach out to the site Admins and plead your case.

 

[onehitwanda]

Perhaps OP is a LLM.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Perhaps OP is a LLM.

There was a frankly hilarious example recently of the usual suspects jumping the shark by rushing to the defense of a ‘poster’ who was obviously a bot. They take ‘my Emily’s enemy is my friend’ to its logical conclusion, even if it’s an in silico friend .

 

[StillStunned]

Perhaps OP is a LLM.

What?! Having bots on the boards is bad enough, but lawyers...?

 

[onehitwanda]

There was a frankly hilarious example recently of the usual suspects jumping the shark by rushing to the defense of a ‘poster’ who was obviously a bot. They take ‘my Emily’s enemy is my friend’ to its logical conclusion, even if it’s an in silico friend .

Are in-silicone friends okay? Asking for a friend

 

[OddLove]

If Literotica created an AI Slop category and they started approving and funneling all AI generated/written/assisted stories to it, it would be the most bloated and least viewed category on the site.

Because.

The only way AI generated/written/assisted stories can do well is when the so called 'author' hides and/or lies about the fact that they're using AI. Why? Because the "Marketplace of Free Ideas" overwhelmingly rejects AI slop.

Maybe Literotica should just make them their AI slop category to reduce these types of threads. It could help, maybe. But I'm not sure.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Are in-silicone friends okay? Asking for a friend

So long as you use a water-based lube…