Censoring Stories: Incorrect Perception It is Generated by AI (Big Brother is Alive & Well)

If Literotica created an AI Slop category and they started approving and funneling all AI generated/written/assisted stories to it, it would be the most bloated and least viewed category on the site.

Because.

The only way AI generated/written/assisted stories can do well is when the so called 'author' hides and/or lies about the fact that they're using AI. Why? Because the "Marketplace of Free Ideas" overwhelmingly rejects AI slop.

Maybe Literotica should just make them their AI slop category to reduce these types of threads. It could help, maybe. But I'm not sure.
In legal terms this is called a precedent.

It is not a precedent I would support setting in a site dedicated to the craft of humans writing stories about one of the most fundamental of human acts.
 
Actually, if you read the official stuff put out by Literotica, they frame it, at least partially, as a question of copyright. It's an interesting question, actually.

Copyright exists at the moment an original work is created. So, if it was created by AI, does not that AI (or the organization owning said AI) automatically gain copyright of the creation? If it was a joint venture, with you writing part and AI writing part, do not you both hold the copyright together?

So, can you, as a person who didn't write the entire story, assert sufficient copyright ownership to allow Literotica to legally publish it? That seems to be the question Literotica is concerned with, and rightfully so.
 
Yet another AI thread.
Copyright exists at the moment an original work is created. So, if it was created by AI, does not that AI (or the organization owning said AI) automatically gain copyright of the creation? If it was a joint venture, with you writing part and AI writing part, do not you both hold the copyright together?
In the US at least, for now, AI generated works don't qualify for copyright.

Whether or not modifying the output with your own work makes those parts copyrightable is unclear ATM.

It's still very much untested in court.
 
We're out of rum, and absinthe, and I think @AwkwardMD got lost looking for a shop that still had any tequila for sale.

It's dire. We're contemplating moving on to Isopropyl alcohol and lemon jelly shooters.
You shouldn't drink isopropyl !! You're supposed to use it in an enema ( other flavours are available )
 
I agree with that. In fact I agree with most of the comments. My point is why not let the readers decide what is quality? Just like in the commercial world if readers don't like it they will not consume it.
Why do spam filters exist, when readers can just decide which emails they like?
 
So, can you, as a person who didn't write the entire story, assert sufficient copyright ownership to allow Literotica to legally publish it? That seems to be the question Literotica is concerned with, and rightfully so.
"Concerned with" and reacting by washing their hands of it with a zero tolerance policy.

Rightfully so indeed, from the point of view of a party who never wants to be on the sharp end of infringement claims.
 
Why do spam filters exist, when readers can just decide which emails they like?
Why do gallery showings exist, when art lovers can just view every painting in the world and decide for themselves which ones they like?


Now that scientists have discovered the answer to the question which came first, the chicken or the egg; now those two questions need to be answered
 
Back
Top