LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Climate continues to change.

Status
Not open for further replies.
query said:
WOWWWW! Double???

SO that is like 2/3 of an entire degree Celcius! 2 degrees every 150 years...they must be SWEATING bullets.
Click to expand...
So if your temperature went from 98.6 degrees to 99.8 degrees and never went down, that wouldn't bother you at all?
 
Apparently AJ is completely convinced that Fundamentalists are now wholly concerned with mitigating climate change.

No evidence, no reportage, no links, not even an opinion piece other than his own.

Even God thinks he's an idiot.
 
phrodeau said:
Apparently AJ is completely convinced that Fundamentalists are now wholly concerned with mitigating climate change.

No evidence, no reportage, no links, not even an opinion piece other than his own.

Even God thinks he's an idiot.
Click to expand...

He takes it all on faith.
 
phrodeau said:
So if your temperature went from 98.6 degrees to 99.8 degrees and never went down, that wouldn't bother you at all?
Click to expand...

But it would go down...since the outside temperature is sometimes as high as 120 degrees (in the shade) we have these things called pools, air conditioners and wet t-shirt contests. (another 10 pounds and I am gonna enter!)

By the way, my ex and a couple of my kids run 99.2 as a baseline. Anything under about 104 is safe and kills off pathogens.

Global warming is not people body-core warming...

..or polar bears cozys.
 
What if the ones that are actual bridge engineers say that their studies were wrongly interpreted in favor of bridge collapse?

What if the troll under the bridge hoped to make money on having it rebuilt?

What if the people sympathetic to the troll who did this "study of other studies" refused to release their methodology and raw data for independent review?

Then what?
 
query said:
What if the ones that are actual bridge engineers say that their studies were wrongly interpreted in favor of bridge collapse?

What if the troll under the bridge hoped to make money on having it rebuilt?

What if the people sympathetic to the troll who did this "study of other studies" refused to release their methodology and raw data for independent review?

Then what?
Click to expand...
Present your evidence.

There's a lot of science out there for you to refute.
 
phrodeau said:
Present your evidence.

There's a lot of science out there for you to refute.
Click to expand...

Present the sequestered evidence out there for that tired untrue statement that 97% of all scientists agree that man-caused global warming is the threat that you chicken little types say.

It exactly like the 77 cents on the dollar crap we still hear even from the president of the united states. I do not have to refute a gratuitous statement that 97% of all scientists agree with you.

Show me a simple list of the scientists and their articles that the 97% study used. Show me which ones they claimed support your nonsensical view of the world and the 3% that didn't.

Some of you nuts claim it increases earthquakes. Do 97% believe that too?
 
I'm sure query would drive his kids across a bridge judged 3% safe.
Probably never had them vaccinated, either.
:nods:
 
there are more than 200 articles debunking the 97% claim that was based on as little as 200 articles hand-culled for information bias.

But continue to believe that the earth is flat is settled science.

The latest example of this effort from Mann was his Jan. 19 opinion piece in The New York Times. In it, Mann bemoaned the fact that there is any sort of debate going on over climate change “where none should exist.” Despite Mann’s claims about the “appearance of a debate” in the media on climate change, the news media are dismissive of manmade climate change skeptics, even going so far as to compare them to “flat earthers,” and are frequently alarmist in coverage of climate.

In the piece, Mann based his arguments a study which claimed that 97 percent of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change. While Mann didn’t specify which study he was citing (there have been at least three studies), all are misleading. But that hasn’t stopped people from claiming them as fact, as NASA has.

There are many scientists who disagree with so-called “consensus” on global warming. On Dec. 20, 2007, a report released by the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee revealed more than 400 prominent scientists questioning anthropogenic climate change.

The most recent study to come out with this 97 percent number was released in January 2014. That study by James L. Powell, a former member of the National Science Board, was an expanded version of his Nov. 2012 study. His latest version claims that only one scientific study in the past year disagreed with anthropogenic climate change. It was touted by left-wing website Salon.com, and given the timing, appears to be the study Mann was referencing.

According to Powell, his first study searched for peer-reviewed scientific articles supporting climate change from January 1991 to November 2012 from a scientific database. From the 13,950 results, Powell removed all the results which he determined were unimportant, and then compared the remaining results. The second study looked at November 2012 through December 2013.

But Powell himself admitted that his methods were subjective. "[F]rom the get-go I do not claim that I have found every article on global warming. I probably have not found every article that rejects global warming. What I have found is the proportion of articles with topics ‘global warming’ or ‘global climate change’ that reject AGW as I define reject," Powell said in the “methodology” section of his website.

Mark Morano of Climate Depot called Powell’s study a “misdirection.” According to Morano, the study “is implying that skeptics do not ‘accept man-made global warming’ without defining what that means.”

Powell’s study was mimicked by the Climate Change site Skeptical Science, which isn’t even remotely skeptical when it comes to global warming. This study was picked up by the liberal outlet “Slate,” which is owned by the Washington Post.

An older study with the same 97 percent result was released in June 2010 National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) study that looked at 1,372 scientific studies – and then selected what the PNAS determined as the top 200. Only 2.5 percent of these “top studies” were “unconvinced by the evidence” about man-made climate change, according to PNAS. Steve Milloy at Junk Science is just one of the people who have criticized that study’s methodology, although some prominent media sites ran the number, including USA Today.

Morano argued that the number of research papers during this time period alone isn’t a compelling factor, even if the numbers had been accurate. According to Morano, since global warming is the “state sponsored science of the day,” many scientists will incorporate mention of it into otherwise unrelated studies, in order to qualify for grants.

“If a scientist studies butterflies, he may choose to do a model ‘if/then’ study on how warming temps 100 years from now may impact butterflies,” Morano said. “The butterfly scientist may never even look at the probability temps may rise a certain amount, only on how rising temps would theoretically impact butterflies.”

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mike-c...tists-claim-resurfaces-ny-times#ixzz3BS8d2uzi
Click to expand...
 
query said:
But it would go down...since the outside temperature is sometimes as high as 120 degrees (in the shade) we have these things called pools, air conditioners and wet t-shirt contests. (another 10 pounds and I am gonna enter!)

By the way, my ex and a couple of my kids run 99.2 as a baseline. Anything under about 104 is safe and kills off pathogens.

Global warming is not people body-core warming...

..or polar bears cozys.
Click to expand...

No one said global warming is people warming.
 
query said:
But it would go down...since the outside temperature is sometimes as high as 120 degrees (in the shade) we have these things called pools, air conditioners and wet t-shirt contests. (another 10 pounds and I am gonna enter!)

By the way, my ex and a couple of my kids run 99.2 as a baseline. Anything under about 104 is safe and kills off pathogens.

Global warming is not people body-core warming...

..or polar bears cozys.
Click to expand...

query said:
I didn't say anyone said that. Show me where I said that someone said that.
Click to expand...

Enjoy. And I never said you said someone said it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
NOAA: Carbon Dioxide in Atmosphere Reaches Highest Level in Millions of Years
Replies
5
Views
182
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
P
Trump administration set to shutter iconic research center in New York
Replies
2
Views
249
rachaelwillguideyou
R
Rightguide
“Climate Change” Hoax Needs to Be Removed From All U.S. Education Books
7 8 9
Replies
215
Views
5K
Politruk
P
P
Trump causes scientists to flee the U.S.
2 3
Replies
59
Views
2K
MajorRewrite
M
SugarDaddy1
The next big climate scare: Counting climate change deaths
Replies
1
Views
306
Fuzzy1975
F
Back
Top