Comments that leave you shaking your head

Got this comment on my newest story and immediately thought of this thread.
Nice story I didn’t mind you should have done a story about a lesbian falling for her coworker and then her other male colleague agreed to be her baby daddy donor or a story about a mom named holly having a affair on Valentine’s Day with a guy named Dakota and she becomes pregnant with her daughter Kyndal baby brothers or sisters but during the conception or the pregnancy she is having another affair with her daughter which results in her having to have her daughter and their friend maybe Bryce help them resulting in the birth of Kyndal siblings while Kyndal is getting pregnant with Bryce kids
My story has a lesbian in it, an incestuous relationship, a pregnancy, and Valentine's day. It doesn't have coworkers, affairs, Holly, Dakota, Kyndal, or Bryce. Wow.
 
Got this comment on my newest story and immediately thought of this thread.

My story has a lesbian in it, an incestuous relationship, a pregnancy, and Valentine's day. It doesn't have coworkers, affairs, Holly, Dakota, Kyndal, or Bryce. Wow.
I guess they rewrote your story in their head? So they could complain about it more? On the other hand a few weeks back someone posted a comment they received from a drunk reader- but they apologized apparently- maybe that's what's going on here? But wow.
 
It's really weird to me that Stacnash has appointed themselves a story grader, giving long diatribes and creating graded lists to try to shame authors when they obviously can't diagram an English sentence at an 8th grade level. I feel like a fuckup of that level should involve a Japanese style public apology with a press conference and an extended formal bow.

That's on you. Don't blame Stacnash.
 
So I got one of Stacnash's unhinged 855 word review tirades on one of my works. A lot is intended to be insulting to me and my readers, so naturally it is. But here is my favorite part:



On the technical side, that's the past perfect tense. It's not doubled usage. It's just... the past perfect tense. When an action started and finished in the past, that's the English construction. The first had is the tense identifier and the second had is the verb, they are different words that are spelled the same.

It was just... really weird for someone to appoint themselves the arbiter of what is good or bad in all of English writing and to just obviously not know the twelve tenses of English verbs. Just.... why?
I really hate using had had, just because I always worry it looks ‘wrong’ to the reader. It looks ‘wrong’ to me whenever I write it. But I almost always leave it in, because it is perfectly grammatical and often insanely useful. Writing around it usually requires at least an extra clause that bogs down the flow.
Do not waste your reader’s time with contortions meant to satisfy 19th Century English bishops!
Seriously, don't even worry about ‘properly’ using one of the twelve tenses. This is ENGLISH we are talking about here. If you find a new temporal circumstance, just figure out how to express it with clarity, and bingo, you’ve patched English. That is how this language works. When enough people install the patch in their own writing, it gets added to the documentation. English is open source.
 
If you find a new temporal circumstance, just figure out how to express it with clarity, and bingo, you’ve patched English.
Do you want a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense? Because that's how you get a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense.
 
Anonymous comment on Adriatic Au Naturel, my latest and currently highest rated story.

"Pretty routine. They talk a lot, then have sex. Then talk some more, and more sex. Repeat."

I wonder what the reader expected. More chat?
 
Anonymous comment on Adriatic Au Naturel, my latest and currently highest rated story.

"Pretty routine. They talk a lot, then have sex. Then talk some more, and more sex. Repeat."

I wonder what the reader expected. More chat?
How many times did you wash, rinse, repeat? Maybe one more go around would've met the expectation?
 
Do you want a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense? Because that's how you get a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense.
Another place entirely, I got told off for saying that I had read that there are either two or fifteen tenses in English. I was corrected, there are only two: Past and Present. The other apparent tenses are constructs. I checked the book I have, and it agreed, I had misremembered, and it was Alfred the Great* who complained that few clerics knew how to conjugate the fifteen tenses. Since then, the Normans invaded, and English ceased to be of interest to Clerics and so became a feral language with no Academy dictating on Vocabulary, Spelling, and Grammar**.
Some may know the Public*** School boy's lament.
Latin is a dead language, as dead as dead can be. First, it killed the Romans, and now it's killing me.
I have reimagined it...
English is a rogue**** language, as free as free can be. They say you shouldn't make stuff up, but that's not stopping me!
*or some other pre-Norman king.
**it wasn't until London printers approached Samuel Johnson to produce a definitive lexicon (due to newly literate readers' complaints about erratic spelling (e.g., gun, gunn and gunne on the same page), let alone between printers). His genius was to add to the normal definition and etymology, a guide to diction - how to say it - for the Mrs Malaprop of the world. Thus creating a new thing - a Dictionary! So now you could read a new word and then use it in polite conversation!
***Schools you have to pay for in the UK are Public Schools, because the only other at the time were Church Private Schools. Other English-speaking countries may differ.
****Should be feral (as in gone wild, not as in being naughty), but it doesn't fit the meter as it has two vowels, not one.

Phew!
 
Do you want a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense? Because that's how you get a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense.
If I need a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense, then you are goddamn right I want a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense!
 
Another place entirely, I got told off for saying that I had read that there are either two or fifteen tenses in English. I was corrected, there are only two: Past and Present. The other apparent tenses are constructs. I checked the book I have, and it agreed, I had misremembered, and it was Alfred the Great* who complained that few clerics knew how to conjugate the fifteen tenses. Since then, the Normans invaded, and English ceased to be of interest to Clerics and so became a feral language with no Academy dictating on Vocabulary, Spelling, and Grammar**.
Some may know the Public*** School boy's lament.
Latin is a dead language, as dead as dead can be. First, it killed the Romans, and now it's killing me.
I have reimagined it...
English is a rogue**** language, as free as free can be. They say you shouldn't make stuff up, but that's not stopping me!
*or some other pre-Norman king.
**it wasn't until London printers approached Samuel Johnson to produce a definitive lexicon (due to newly literate readers' complaints about erratic spelling (e.g., gun, gunn and gunne on the same page), let alone between printers). His genius was to add to the normal definition and etymology, a guide to diction - how to say it - for the Mrs Malaprop of the world. Thus creating a new thing - a Dictionary! So now you could read a new word and then use it in polite conversation!
***Schools you have to pay for in the UK are Public Schools, because the only other at the time were Church Private Schools. Other English-speaking countries may differ.
****Should be feral (as in gone wild, not as in being naughty), but it doesn't fit the meter as it has two vowels, not one.

Phew!
Alas, Bishops are ALWAYS interested in the language...
Robert Lowth thought he was Sammy Johnson the Second, and Sportscasters have been sounding like idiots ever since.
 
If I need a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense, then you are goddamn right I want a Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional tense!
🤣 Please tell me you got the reference, at least?
 
Alas, Bishops are ALWAYS interested in the language...
Robert Lowth thought he was Sammy Johnson the Second, and Sportscasters have been sounding like idiots ever since.
True, but by the time they realised that people liked Shakespeare (you can't actually misspell his name as he had about half a dozen variants), they didn't have the monasteries and monk power to take control. Even the King James version failed to be more than a sea anchor on the evolution of English. As Terry Prachett said (approximate quote) "English doesn't so much as borrow words from another language, but takes it down a dark alley and muggs if for anything of worth."
 
True, but by the time they realised that people liked Shakespeare (you can't actually misspell his name as he had about half a dozen variants), they didn't have the monasteries and monk power to take control. Even the King James version failed to be more than a sea anchor on the evolution of English. As Terry Prachett said (approximate quote) "English doesn't so much as borrow words from another language, but takes it down a dark alley and muggs if for anything of worth."
Like the quote from Pratchett. I've always called English a bastardized language, and I call American English Amerispeak, since to me it's a bastardization of an already bastardized language😆
 
I was going to say, it doesn't so much ring a bell as a dull thud.
But now you mention a reference, it reminds me of Douglas Adams in HHG2TG about a grammar book for time travellers. The latter part (most of it) was blank as nobody read that far.
That's the one.
 
Like the quote from Pratchett. I've always called English a bastardized language, and I call American English Amerispeak, since to me it's a bastardization of an already bastardized language😆
English is the dirty mutt of language.
 
Back
Top