Does anyone actually like Hillary Clinton??

[MetroBeatnik]

To my mind it's a clear choice. Trump is a loud mouthed fuckin imbecile. You wanna vote for him? Go right ahead but don't come crying when it all goes to shit.

 

[Sean]

Let's try and get this straight. What exactly are you saying she did that "sacrificed boots on the ground"?

He didn't come back to answer this, then? Any of the rest of the RWCJ want to take a pop at it?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Yes...and if I was American, a thinking American, I would certainly vote for her.

The alternative is a narcissistic rich loony who cannot inspire and resorts to cheap name-calling and spouting insults to his opponents.

How about a policy?

Thinking Americans do not vote in substantial numbers.

I would prefer a unfiltered narcissist to a paranoid control freak who breaks the law with impunity and thumbs her nose at "the little people."

 

[contrifan32]

He didn't come back to answer this, then? Any of the rest of the RWCJ want to take a pop at it?

Who is responsible for US citizens, property and interests in foreign countries?

 

[nerfhearder]

Who is responsible for US citizens, property and interests in foreign countries?

He asked what she specifically did not who is in charge.

 

[contrifan32]

its what she didn't do

 

[nerfhearder]

its what she didn't do

What then? You keep avoiding answering.

 

[contrifan32]

asked and answered in post #56

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

At 3AM, she did not pick up the phone...

When people died, she blamed a movie while at the same time confiding to her daughter that our GAY ambassador was killed during a terrorist attack.

Is that sufficient?

 

[nerfhearder]

asked and answered in post #56

That's what happened not what she did or didn't do. I don't think you know because you simply won't answer.

 

[BotanyBoy]

That's what happened not what she did or didn't do. I don't think you know because you simply won't answer.

I love it....everything is still Bush's fault but Clinton and Obama are NEVER responsible for ANYTHING EVER.

LMFAO what a bunch of tools.

 

[nerfhearder]

I love it....everything is still Bush's fault but Clinton and Obama are NEVER responsible for ANYTHING EVER.

LMFAO what a bunch of tools.

What?

 

[Sean]

its what she didn't do

What didn't she do?

 

[nerfhearder]

What didn't she do?

He's not gonna answer unless it's just repeating what Chief Dumbass said.

 

[BotanyBoy]

What?

I've watched "progressives" blame Bush for ISIS, the Arab spring and god damn every other thing that happens in the middle east.

Clinton/Obama though? Not at all responsible for any of their actions/policy/decisions......all Bush's fault.

 

[nerfhearder]

I've watched "progressives" blame Bush for ISIS, the Arab spring and god damn every other thing that happens in the middle east.

Clinton/Obama though? Not at all responsible for any of their actions/policy/decisions......all Bush's fault.

And that has what to do with me?

 

[Porkwarrior]

"Arkancide"

Atleast Trump's trail of bodies doesn't lead all the way back to Ollie North & Iran Contra!
Oh and which law firm was dealing with laundering congress's dirty money during Reagan, which had it's own airfield, and what law firm in the 70's & 80's needed it's own airfield that WASN'T hip deep in bullshit? Sorry who was a partner there, at that time?

Hil(l?)ary is long term, hip deep, established DC cuntness. I'm hoping Trump will surprise the world.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I'm strongly in favor of Clinton's health care policy.

• Protect the ACA
• Work towards single payer as national policy
• Continue to incentivize Medicaid Expansion so that states will finally accept it.
• Guarantee access to reproductive services including abortion
• Expand the ACA exchange to allow undocumented immigrants to purchase health insurance regardless of their immigration status
• Tax credit of up to $5000 for insurance premiums paid by employees

I cannot find fault with any of the above platform planks. I am also pretty sure the Usual Suspects can find fault with any/all of the above.

thanks for the response.

This is not radical enough for me. How does one "work towards" single payer?

I am completely against health insurance except for catastrophic health care. Giving me a tax credit for insurance premiums continues to feed the beast... what percentage of health care costs keep the lights on and pays the salaries of people at Blue Cross, Aetna, etc? Having them rubber stamp approval for my allergy medicine is a waste of time and money.

I don't believe Clinton will "work towards" single payer because she would never upset our billion dollar (whatever it is) health insurance industry.

Single payer or cash, plus insurance for catastrophes only. We'll never have a politician in office wih the balls to pull the trigger on that.

 

[BotanyBoy]

And that has what to do with me?

Nothing in particular.....continue your valiant defense of St.Clinton.

 

[BotanyBoy]

thanks for the response.

This is not radical enough for me. How does one "work towards" single payer?

You don't, you just say that so your buddies in the insurance world can keep rat fucking everyone.

I don't believe Clinton will "work towards" single payer because she would never upset our billion dollar (whatever it is) health insurance industry. .

Nuh uh!! St.Clinton has committed her life to helping working class families and children, Obama said so!!

And he has a peace prize!

 

[Porkwarrior]

It does have to hard for the NeoLibtards to embrace Hil(l?)ary.
I'm sorry she's made it so hard for you...but y'know beds, you have to sleep in them after they're made.

I have to admit, she was born for the role of the ultimate shill. Kevin Spacey could use some tips.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtT9Jz4FaQE

 

[Porkwarrior]

If you look up "Pandering" in Webster's...I'm almost surprised I didn't see some hot sauce in a purse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

 

[pete]

He didn't come back to answer this, then? Any of the rest of the RWCJ want to take a pop at it?

its an abstract argument to made, for sure.
but in her time as SoS, how were our relations improved overseas?

are we better or worse off with the following:
syria
israel
lybia
n. korea
china
russia
iran
afghanistan
pakistan
mexico
venezuela

certainly it's not to say that she's solely responsible for all our foriegn relationships, but is she accountable for nothing?
and if that's the case, then democrats can't exactly tout her record of international achievement, yeah?

 

[Sean]

its an abstract argument to made, for sure.
but in her time as SoS, how were our relations improved overseas?

are we better or worse off with the following:
syria
israel
lybia
n. korea
china
russia
iran
afghanistan
pakistan
mexico
venezuela

certainly it's not to say that she's solely responsible for all our foriegn relationships, but is she accountable for nothing?
and if that's the case, then democrats can't exactly tout her record of international achievement, yeah?

Not what I asked. I want to know what she did, or didn't do, that "sacrificed boots on the ground".

 

[pete]

Not what I asked. I want to know what she did, or didn't do, that "sacrificed boots on the ground".

well, again, its an tenuous argument to make that since relations are in the shitter with other countries as they are, IF things went tits-up and soldiers were deployed somewhere in the future, an investigation into the root cause of the diplomatic failure might lead one back to her.

then again, i never made the original claim , so no idea what they had in mind.