AwkwardlySet
On-Duty Critic
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2022
- Posts
- 3,106
I see your argument, but I still disagree. There is a well-known pun about the "Batman Begins" movie, where in the end Rachel says how Bruce Wayne is the mask and Batman is the true face.I'm unconvinced, although you are spot on with the anonymity/lack of consequences observation (same sort of behavior that shows up while driving as 'road rage'.) Or a pint or two over the limit at the pub.
Sherry Turkle has written quite a bit about online personas ('Life on the Screen' in 1995 and 'Alone Together' in 2011) and she notes that many folks present a 'curated' self, one of the peculiarities of online life, which can allow enormous distortion. I don't think I see people's 'truest selves' on the internet for the most part, unless said persons are unusually honest and articulate. Specific individual characteristics can certainly be magnified online.
It often ends up like the old 'house of mirrors' business at the carnivals and fun houses, where diffraction seems to be the norm, and the reader/correspondent needs to be alert and discriminating to understand what's really going on.
I believe that for most people, their internet personas are closer to their true character because in real life they still need to adhere to certain social norms. Your argument, if I understood you right, is that the way people act in everyday life is who they are. I disagree. It is who they have to be, while deep down they have a whole different personality that only very few, if any at all are privy to. Of course, people can also roleplay when online, but that "role" will still exhibit strong traits of their true character, in my opinion.