HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 44,882
Let's correct that misconception right from the start. Trump does not want to see an end to the killing. He wants to see the open battle postponed until after his Presidential term is over.
Trump has been adamant that his goal is to stop the killing. He's said this many times and there's nothing to show that he feels differently than what he's said.
Should there be a ceasefire or some sort of imposed agreement, Russia will simply continue the killing inside the occupied territories until there are no Ukrainians left. Bucha and Kherson are evidence enough of that. What Trump would rather do is IGNORE the killings that he doesn't want to know about.
Then it will be Russia who would be in violation of their own peace agreement. This is not unusual between warring nations where rancor runs deep.
All the evidence points to Putin simplt using any ceasefire to rebuild the Russian Army and attack again, as he did in Chechyna. He has broken every agreement he has ever signed. Is Trump prepared to put the US Army on the ground, between Russia and Ukraine, with a committment to fight the Russians if they break any ceasefire or treaty? THAT is the only guarantee that would work. If Trump is not prepared to do that, he is simply guaranteeing that Russia will attack again from a stronger position in the near future, and the killing will resume with Ukraine at a greater disadvantage.
This is always the risk as we have seen with Hamas/Hezbollah and Israel. Their ceasefire agreements always seem to allow the Palestinians to rearm and attack again in the future. Trump's challenge is to get both sides to agree to just stop fighting and then stick to their agreements.
Again, there is NO WAY Trump can guarantee a ceasefire or a peace agreement that will last. None at all. He might want the killing to stop, but the only way it will stop is
(a) if Russia is defeated (killing will stop)
(b) if Russian wins (my bad. Killing will not stop. It will continue until the Ukrainian genocide is complete)
Yes, you would like to see an end to the killing of Ukrainians (I really don't care about Russians). We all would. That will only happen when Russia is defeated.
Trump isn't in a position to guarantee anything. His role is to mediate an agreement between the parties. That's it.
Nope. Trump and you are both ignoring the fact that the killing will continue. Only, it will be behind Russian lines, and then when Russia attacks again. It's honestly better that Trump fail now, STFU, and just sell weapons to Ukraine. He's not going to achieve anything except make himself look like a fool. Which he is already doing to the rest of the world. Particulary those who understand Russia.
Then he looks like a fool for trying to save lives when neither party cares about those lives.
This IS WW3, and Trump is already losing it.
No it isn't. Not yet. It will be if Russia is pressed to the point they will use nukes, but we aren't there yet.
Following what you want to happen will guarantee that nukes will be used.
No, he's not. He's made concessions on behalf of Ukraine he is not entitled to make. He's sided with Putin and attacked Ukraine again and again.
He is in no way a mediator.
He has no stake in the outcome other than in his role as a mediator and trying to bring the parties to the bargaining table. Putin wants certain things, Trump, as mediator, will convey those demands to Zelensky. That's not a concession of anything.
He also hasn't "attacked Ukraine." That's just ridiculous to say.
And Trump should just stay out of it. There is no need for mediation. All Trump needs to do is step back, impose sanctions on Russia as the aggressor, and sell weapons and ammo to Ukraine and let them do the job.
Which will start WWIII. There's no wiggle room here, if the two nations continue to fight and Ukraine pressures Russia hard enough, Ukraine will be nuked and the world will be poorer for it.
Trump has positioned himself firmly on the wrong side of history on this one. He'll go down alongside Neville Chamberlain, and there was absolutely no need for him to do this to himself.
This may end up being true but there's an old adage that all it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Whatever your view of Trump the person, he's doing more than nothing. He may not succeed, but he's in there trying. And he's doing it despite the badmouthing he's getting for it.








