Hunter Biden's Labtop

Hunter is a drug addict who peddled access to his father. His father, who has been a senator, vice president, and is now president, has been aware of this since his days as vp. .
 
The emails on Hunters laptop reveal that he sold his Chinese and Ukrainian business clients access to his father who was Vice President of the United States at the time. Contrary to bogus claims by some former U.S. intelligence bureaucrats, the emails were not Russian disinformation. Indeed Hunter himself never denied their authenticity and they have been verified by digital forensic experts as well as by various individuals who were included in correspondence.

We know Hunter and the President’s brother were rewarded handsomely. And we know that someone referred to as “the big guy” stood to be rewarded as well.

The controversy over “Hunter’s laptop” is not really about the laptop itself. It’s about peddling to foreign nationals affiliated with adversarial governments access to the Vice President.

The two most obvious questions are
1. What did Biden know about Hunter’s activities
2. Did the Vice President himself benefit or stand to benefit?

We know that Hunter accompanied Joe on a trip to China, and we know that Joe met with some of Hunter’s clients and business associates. It is inconceivable that Joe was in the dark. The question of financial benefit is less obvious because the Biden family money is intertwined between Hunter, Joes brother, and Joe himself.

The Biden Administration, aided by a Democratic Congress, a lapdog AG, social media companies, and a friendly press have successfully suppressed scrutiny on this issue. The incoming GOP House will be investigating this for the first time. It is in America’s interest that the investigation moves forward to determine exactly what the facts are.
In terms of corruption, this is super minor league - I'm not even sure it's illegal. I mean, I'm from Denmark, could be different in the US. But ... companies are welcome to contact the vicepresident - finding an easier way in isn't exactly Criminal Mastermind stuff, sales people do it all day, every day. I'm sure a lot of money changed hands, but ... I mean, come on - talking to people, even people we 'don't like', the chinese and the russians and so on - is perfectly legal. Remember Saudi Arabia? Remember Bin Laden (you guys all know he was the guy who received all those stinger missiles that forced the russians out of Afghanistan, right)? Remember, oh I dunno, Manuel Noriega? Saddam Hussein? Any nation that isn't socialist and is working towards a goal the US likes, they're sure to have had US support at some point. Even the overtly villainous ones.

I think Hunter Biden gets a bad rap because he's a spoiled brat, basically. He's no worse than the rest, it's just so obvious that he lacks any real talent, and only has a name and a place because of his father.
 
Here’s a nice email Hunter sent to CEFC Chairman Ye Jianming. Presumably he was going to introduce the chairman to friends from his book club. 😇

“My Understanding is that the original agreement with the Director was for consulting fees based on introductions alone a rate of $10M per year for a three year guarantee total of $30M. The chairman changed that deal after we me in MIAMI TO A MUCH MORE LASTING AND LUCRATIVE ARRANGEMENT to create a holding company 50% percent owned by ME and 50% owned by him. Consulting fees is one piece of our income stream but the reason this proposal by the chairman was so much more interesting to me and my family is that we would also be partners inn the equity and profits of the JV's investments.“
Im not sure how anyone can still be in the dark on this issue unless they live under a rock in the Arizona desert. There’s two parallel issues, one being the suppression of the NYP article just before the elections and did the feds actually have a hand in the censorship attempt to protect the Biden campaign, the other is the actual congressional investigation into criminal behavior by the Biden family and a possible referral for an independent counsel by congress. Garland is obviously not interested in digging deeper into Biden’s overseas accounts (shell companies LLCs,) or Chinese, Russian, Ukraine business transactions which some are flagged with SARs 150+ to date. Then there’s the possibility of FARA violations and violations of the emolument clause.

It’s comical how Laz and Fuzzynuts have this *nothing to see here* or *let’s see the emails*, ya have to question what planet they live on.
 
As long as Garland is Joe’s wingman nothing but puff puff patticake and slap tickle between house Dems and pubs which will result in nothing more than 2024 grandstanding. Dems are leading 2 zip for special counsel. By 2024 the capital building will be converted into a housing complex for illegal migrants.
Stay on track! Don’t move those goalposts like a “you know who”!

Hunters been under investigation since 2018 and the laptop was turned in in December 2019. That’s plenty of time to turn over the rocks during a repub administration.
 
Last edited:
In terms of corruption, this is super minor league - I'm not even sure it's illegal. I mean, I'm from Denmark, could be different in the US. But ... companies are welcome to contact the vicepresident - finding an easier way in isn't exactly Criminal Mastermind stuff, sales people do it all day, every day. I'm sure a lot of money changed hands, but ... I mean, come on - talking to people, even people we 'don't like', the chinese and the russians and so on - is perfectly legal. Remember Saudi Arabia? Remember Bin Laden (you guys all know he was the guy who received all those stinger missiles that forced the russians out of Afghanistan, right)? Remember, oh I dunno, Manuel Noriega? Saddam Hussein? Any nation that isn't socialist and is working towards a goal the US likes, they're sure to have had US support at some point. Even the overtly villainous ones.

I think Hunter Biden gets a bad rap because he's a spoiled brat, basically. He's no worse than the rest, it's just so obvious that he lacks any real talent, and only has a name and a place because of his father.
It’s not illegal to peddle influence. The House investigation will not center on Hunter. It will center mostly on his father - what he knew, when did he know, did he profit, and was national security compromised. It will also center on the 51 former intelligence officials who lied about the laptop being Russian disinformation. Because they were former officials at the time of their lie, probably no laws were broken, however it might lead to reform of these bureaucracies to restore public trust.
 
In terms of corruption, this is super minor league - I'm not even sure it's illegal. I mean, I'm from Denmark, could be different in the US. But ... companies are welcome to contact the vicepresident - finding an easier way in isn't exactly Criminal Mastermind stuff, sales people do it all day, every day. I'm sure a lot of money changed hands, but ... I mean, come on - talking to people, even people we 'don't like', the chinese and the russians and so on - is perfectly legal. Remember Saudi Arabia? Remember Bin Laden (you guys all know he was the guy who received all those stinger missiles that forced the russians out of Afghanistan, right)? Remember, oh I dunno, Manuel Noriega? Saddam Hussein? Any nation that isn't socialist and is working towards a goal the US likes, they're sure to have had US support at some point. Even the overtly villainous ones.

I think Hunter Biden gets a bad rap because he's a spoiled brat, basically. He's no worse than the rest, it's just so obvious that he lacks any real talent, and only has a name and a place because of his father.
Stay on track! Don’t move those goalposts like a “you know who”!

Hunters been under investigation since 2018 and the laptop was turned in in December 2019. That’s plenty of time to turn over the rocks during a repub administration.
Hunter‘s been under investigation by Weis in Delaware for tax evasion, there’s more to it, this should be about Joe Biden’s involvement also. If for nothing more, is Joe compromised which is a national security issue.
 
Hunter‘s been under investigation by Weis in Delaware for tax evasion, there’s more to it, this should be about Joe Biden’s involvement also. If for nothing more, is Joe compromised which is a national security issue.
So sic Mueller on him. Like I’ve said before, I thought his investigation of trump was important for for the country’s trust and security and integrity no matter the outcome. Though trump got a pass on obstruction.
 
So sic Mueller on him. Like I’ve said before, I thought his investigation of trump was important for for the country’s trust and security and integrity no matter the outcome. Though trump got a pass on obstruction.
A criminal investigation predicated on lies does not build trust in our justice system. Obstruction of what. In a criminal investigation where a prosecutor finds no crime the case is closed. There is no such thing as exonerated. The point man in the Mueller investigation was Andrew Weissmann a well known Trump hater. The byproduct of the investigation was the indictment of Russian agents and front companies which was a good thing but the obstruction of justice after Trump was found not to be implicated with a conspiracy was a cheap tactic used by Weissmann to make sure house Dems could hang their hat on a frivolous obstruction charge.

Mueller’s investigated was a wide investigation that netted Manafort, Stone, Cohen and a few others which should never have happened, but what’s ironic is none of the HRC, DNC activities, Steele dossier, FISA fraud were included in the investigation. What started as a Russian interference investigation morphed into a scorched earth approach to the Trump administration.

When you have Dems like Maxine and Allan Green calling for Trump’s impeachment before he’s even inaugurated and Litittia James re-election platform “GET TRUMP” which she should have been disbarred, where’s the fairness or equal protection under the law.
 
Last edited:
Hunter is a drug addict who peddled access to his father. His father, who has been a senator, vice president, and is now president, has been aware of this since his days as vp. .
Again, so what? Unless Hunter or Joe actually engaged in illegal activities, and as of yet, there is zero evidence of money changing hands solely for access, and Joe actually following through on something Hunter set up, its a nothing burger. One which you keep taking bites out of.

Points in question, did Trump or Ivanka do anything illegal with China, see the link.

My own opinion: while it does seems suspicious, I can see why China might fast track Trump's daughter to curie favour with Trump to avoid a trade war. So yes on the surface it looks bad,but was there any actual behinds the scenes colluding>? None have shown up it seems, kind of like this BS you keep going on over with Hunter.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommyb...ast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/

Take a fucking pill Bozo, relax till the investigations over...I figure Hunter gets nailed with Tax issues, and Joe with nothing, because that is what the facts seem to point to....
 
…but the obstruction of justice after Trump was found not to be implicated with a conspiracy was a cheap tactic used by Weissmann to make sure house Dems could hang their hat on a frivolous obstruction charge.
Whats cheap about putting a light on trump’s actual behavior? He got a pass on obstruction.

Mueller’s investigated was a wide investigation that netted Manafort, Stone, Cohen and a few others which should never have happened, but what’s ironic is none of the HRC, DNC activities, Steele dossier, FISA fraud were included in the investigation. What started as a Russian interference investigation morphed into a scorched earth approach to the Trump administration.
Or perhaps, following the evidence of actual criminal activity.

When you have Dems like Maxine and Allan Green calling for Trump’s impeachment before he’s even inaugurated and Litittia James re-election platform “GET TRUMP” which she should have been disbarred, where’s the fairness or equal protection under the law.
Maybe they should have been. But then, there’s a lot of whataboutisms to go round.
 
Again, so what? Unless Hunter or Joe actually engaged in illegal activities, and as of yet, there is zero evidence of money changing hands solely for access, and Joe actually following through on something Hunter set up, its a nothing burger. One which you keep taking bites out of.

Points in question, did Trump or Ivanka do anything illegal with China, see the link.

My own opinion: while it does seems suspicious, I can see why China might fast track Trump's daughter to curie favour with Trump to avoid a trade war. So yes on the surface it looks bad,but was there any actual behinds the scenes colluding>? None have shown up it seems, kind of like this BS you keep going on over with Hunter.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommyb...ast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/

Take a fucking pill Bozo, relax till the investigations over...I figure Hunter gets nailed with Tax issues, and Joe with nothing, because that is what the facts seem to point to....
Good job. You’re finally acknowledging the reasons for the upcoming House investigation.
 
Good job. You’re finally acknowledging the reasons for the upcoming House investigation.
Huh? Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? I said that already....In fact I said they should investigate ALL potential issues for any President or member of legislature.. It is you who only think Joe should be investigated....Republicans can just have a free ride....

Like I said earlier as well you're a two faced hypocritical fucking idiot...
 
Really, all of your leadership over there needs to seriously disentagle themselves from corporate - and other financial - ties. Only, then how are they going to get the chance to get elected? So ... you're all fucked. Good luck =)
 
It is you who only think Joe should be investigated...
Not a matter of who I think SHOULD be investigated. It’s a fact. Joe IS going to be investigated. Obviously anyone else who may have committed wrongdoing with regard to the Biden family business will be included as well. The committee chair has made that quite clear.
 
Not a matter of who I think SHOULD be investigated. It’s a fact. Joe IS going to be investigated. Obviously anyone else who may have committed wrongdoing with regard to the Biden family business will be included as well. The committee chair has made that quite clear.
See that is my point, you only care about Biden, and Democrats......thank you for finally admitting that all your posting is just partisan whining.

Should be fun entertainment.....but will the Speaker be McCarthy....lol that show may even be funnier.
 
See that is my point, you only care about Biden, and Democrats......thank you for finally admitting that all your posting is just partisan whining.

Should be fun entertainment.....but will the Speaker be McCarthy....lol that show may even be funnier.

BabyBoobs and ineedhelp1 can’t differentiate between decent people laughing at their rabid appetite for nothing burgers and decent people laughing at the “republican’s” imminent and perfectly within their purview nothing burger investigation.

There will be an investigation, and decent people will laugh.

And UnderDon will still be prosecuted for various crimes.

🤣

🇺🇸
 
See that is my point, you only care about Biden, and Democrats......thank you for finally admitting that all your posting is just partisan whining.

Should be fun entertainment.....but will the Speaker be McCarthy....lol that show may even be funnier.
Biden is the subject of the thread. The OP asked about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
 
Biden is the subject of the thread. The OP asked about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Yes the thread is about what the information stored on his laptop may point to, in regards to alleged influence peddling. I am just pointing out the only reason you care is he is the son of a Democrat. Glad we are all squared away Bozo, on what this thread is about, and the reasons why of both of us are posting in it.
 
This video interview with investigative journalist Peter Schwezer does a thorough job of explaining the connection between Hunters laptop content and the Biden family business. Schwezer also explains the differences between the Biden family’s overseas business dealings in China and other countries and Trump family’s overseas businesses. Good synopsis of what the House committee is expected to investigate.


 
This video interview with investigative journalist Peter Schwezer does a thorough job of explaining the connection between Hunters laptop content and the Biden family business. Schwezer also explains the differences between the Biden family’s overseas business dealings in China and other countries and Trump family’s overseas businesses. Good synopsis of what the House committee is expected to investigate.


And out of all of that, the only thing is a single email that is suspected of being connected.

Everything else is just Hunter doing shitty things and conspiracy theorists making up shit.
 
Schwezer's books titles tell you what he "investigated" and why.
 
Another clip on how easily Schwezer’s research team was able to validate much of the laptop content in a matter of hours. For example the cash transfers to Hunters firm mentioned in emails matched the government’s suspicious activities report. And Hunter’s travel records that were released by the secret service matched dates and locations referenced in emails. Again, the FBI had possession of the laptop nearly a year before the NY Post story broke. They knew it was not a hack.

 
If as BB50 states, the investigation isn't about Hunter but about Joe's actions, after reading every post it appears the smoking gun that implicates Joe in Hunters business is one thing: that Hunter arranged and Joe had a meeting with a some Ukrainian businessman. What I didn't see, nor did anyone highlight is this: did Joe discuss business with this guy at that meeting? Yeah, he had the meeting, but what was discussed? Is there any proof it was business? Any proof anywhere?

So far the smoking gun appears to be a fizzled fire. Burt let's get on with the investigation. if it shows anything I'll be happy to admit it, but I will also be very happy to do an "I told you so" when nothing of consequence is uncovered. Let's do this thing!

Comshaw
 
If as BB50 states, the investigation isn't about Hunter but about Joe's actions, after reading every post it appears the smoking gun that implicates Joe in Hunters business is one thing: that Hunter arranged and Joe had a meeting with a some Ukrainian businessman. What I didn't see, nor did anyone highlight is this: did Joe discuss business with this guy at that meeting? Yeah, he had the meeting, but what was discussed? Is there any proof it was business? Any proof anywhere?

So far the smoking gun appears to be a fizzled fire. Burt let's get on with the investigation. if it shows anything I'll be happy to admit it, but I will also be very happy to do an "I told you so" when nothing of consequence is uncovered. Let's do this thing!

Comshaw
150+ SARs
 
If as BB50 states, the investigation isn't about Hunter but about Joe's actions, after reading every post it appears the smoking gun that implicates Joe in Hunters business is one thing: that Hunter arranged and Joe had a meeting with a some Ukrainian businessman. What I didn't see, nor did anyone highlight is this: did Joe discuss business with this guy at that meeting? Yeah, he had the meeting, but what was discussed? Is there any proof it was business? Any proof anywhere?

So far the smoking gun appears to be a fizzled fire. Burt let's get on with the investigation. if it shows anything I'll be happy to admit it, but I will also be very happy to do an "I told you so" when nothing of consequence is uncovered. Let's do this thing!

Comshaw

Except there is no proof that there was even a “meeting”.

And much of the content on the laptop can never be verified.

The whole problem with “Hunter’s laptop”, was that corrupt actors were “embellishing” the contents. And those corrupt actors tried to insert their “embellishments” into the mainstream coverage of the verified material. - RIGHT BEFIRE THE 2020 ELECTION.

The usual suspects also wanted the FBI to violate its standard practice of not interfering in elections AGAIN.

The FBI followed their own standards and practices in 2020, and now BabyBoobs et al. are quite upset.

Poor BabyBoobs.

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Back
Top