Drop that stupid canard once and for all. The Nazis and the Fascists were not any kind of socialists. Their economics were entirely different.Is Trump a fascist NOW?!
- Thread starter Wilson23
- Start date
Drop that stupid canard once and for all. The Nazis and the Fascists were not any kind of socialists. Their economics were entirely different.That's not socialism.
Don't ever think you know better than Orwell -- he was a Socialist who fought Fascists. (And he had a better claim to the name than Stalin did.)
Only in the ancillary/ideological neuance.....at the end of the day it's still a state controlled economy.
That's why you hate that it's brought up, you don't don't like to own up to your own authoritarianism and blood soaked history. Just like women.....
We laregly agree on most things, especially how authoritarian socialism is.
And well understood that they were more alike than either liked to admit......thus some of his most famous work.
Nope. Stalin had every bit the claim. You just don't like socialism's dirty side in the light....that's why you guys try to pretend none of it was REAL socialism, LOL bullshit.
Every economy is state-controlled to some degree, wherever an effectual state exists at all. (Somalia, with no such state, is about the only place in the world that has a free market.) That is not a distinguishing characteristic of socialism or of fascism.
Nope, and the free market exists all around us, doesn't require the state at all.
Literally the defining charicteristic of socialism.
And fascism like communism is an ideology that runs on a socialist economy.
No fascist state had one.
The market is not what you might call a "natural" thing like human social organization.
Both Nazi Germany and Italy had one.
Then why does it flourish as such?? Why despite socialist best efforts to stamp it out.....does it persist exactly as that??
Making money is a social activity.
Havanawang
Virgin
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
- Posts
- 134
Fascists are those among us who created "laws" requiring payment of so-called taxes. Once the money has been "voluntarily" paid (under penalty of fines and imprisonment) the money is distributed as those bin power see fit. Billions of dollars for war and all the weapons, bombs, bullets, buttons and boots required during the endeavor. Meanwhile, back home, children are starving, education is denied the economy thrives on the blood spilt elsewhere. The north American continent is a sacred burial ground where 2-3 million indigenous peoples were slaughter ed over the last few hundred years...
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 70,762
Show us where he's violating the law or the Constitution.
For reference
President Trump signed an executive order on his first day back in office aiming to deny automatic U.S. citizenship to children born here to noncitizen parents; federal judges called that order unconstitutional and blocked it
Analysts and advocacy groups point to an unusually large volume of executive orders and personnel actions—such as firing inspectors general—taken without the notice and congressional engagement critics say statutes and norms require. The Brennan Center characterized early moves as “flagrantly” violating rules, statutes or constitutional norms
Senator Peters’ report charges the administration with seizing congressional powers and retaliating against officials and private citizens who criticized or oversaw the government, framing those actions as threats to constitutional checks and the rule of law
Some commentators and members of Congress contend certain military actions — for example, bombing operations referenced by critics — violated the Constitution’s War Powers Clause by exceeding Congress’s authority to declare war
The administration’s practice of conditioning federal funds on state or local cooperation with federal immigration objectives produced lawsuits by states asserting constitutional and statutory violations; Just Security’s tracker and contemporaneous reporting show multiple suits alleging separation‑of‑powers and Administrative Procedure Act violations
Available sources document many lawsuits, injunctions, and at least one major executive order deemed unconstitutional by lower courts,
No, they didn't.
Economy of Nazi Germany.
Economy of Fascist Italy.
You won't find any socialist who wants things run that way.
For one thing, there's the Posse Comitatus Act.
Oh look strong centralized state control of the economy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_fascist_Italy
LOL...they why does every single one of them do exactly that??
Why does every lefty ever support exactly that???
Socialism is about equality, not state control. Fascism is about hierarchy.
Incorrect, literally the opposite.
As usual. They don't even try to sell it on equality because that's just so on it's face wrong.
They try to sell it on equity, but they always need state control to do it... thus the lefty/anarchist paradox.
How can anarchism be left if the left requires a state to do all it's equity enforcement??
Capitalism doesn't need a state, that's why most on the right are for small or highly restricted government authority...or none. Far closer to being anarchist than the collectivist crybabies that demand the nanny state micromanage their entire lives.
Nope fascism is about state control too. Just like all the other lefties....marxist don't get special "true lefty" status simply because they enjoy huffing their own farts so much.
Last edited:
Anarchists think equality is possible without a state. See also Libertarian socialism (not an oxymoron).
OralAllOver
Bi, mostly oral bttm
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2025
- Posts
- 1,662
It was a MAJOR SERIES OF RIOTS AND FIRESTo enforce the laws, George H.W, Bush did the same thing in the 90s, He sent U.S. Marines into Los Angels to stop the Rodney King riots. Eisenhower sent the federal Airborne troops into Alabama to the beat the shit out of people who were stopping black kids from attending school. United States Marines assaulted Alcatraz to put down an inmate riot going on inside. President Franklin D. Roosevelt deployed 6,000 federal troops to Detroit Michigan to suppress a race riot. In 1968, President Johnson deployed federal troops and activated the D.C. National Guard to suppress riots in Washington, D.C., Baltimore, and Chicago following Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination. In 1971, President Richard Nixon used a combined force of law enforcement, National Guardsmen, and active-duty military to manage and arrest Vietnam War protesters in Washington, D.C.. In 1987, President Ronald Reagan invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy federal forces to end a prison riot in Atlanta. All of which demonstrates how friggin' ignorant you are.
BS, Real fascism requires state control of speech, press, and political parties. Under Trump, critics have been free to scream at him daily, nonstop, with zero consequences.
And Mayor ASKED for help
Trump claimed a "rebellion "
I dont understand how these dangerous LIES are tolerated
LOL yet the immidiately appeal to one the second they aren't getting their way.
The "abolish the police" antiFa folks crying for 911 the second they start getting their ass's kicked is a perfect example.
Yea...voluntary and civilized socialist can do that inside of a libertarian/capitalist society. Employee owned companies, co-ops and even communes.
But you can't scale that up to the national level so as to have a socialist economy.
Who is about equality, then? Gotta be somebody, and I know it's nobody on the RW side.
Nobody, it's the lie people sell to get privilege/power over others.
Reality is people aren't equal.
Taxation is a lot older than Fascism.
We are in the Jeffersonian sense.
In that sense the trannies have nothing to complain about.
They have all the same rights under the law and can quit bitching already. Their social standing and inability to get straight men to fuck their poop chute pretend pussies or the public to validate their delusions is their own personal problem and about as far away from a civil rights issue as you can get.
No, they don't, and what they have is being taken away.
