cloudy
Alabama Slammer
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2004
- Posts
- 37,997
Roxanne Appleby said:Gosh, I'm sure I'm biased because I suppose we all have a special place in our hearts for the music we came of age with, but that seems kind of like saying the High Renaissance was a transition from late Medieval art to Mannerism - it was pretty special all by itself. Maybe uniquely so, even. I'm thinking of 1964 to 1969, roughly speaking. Beatles, Jimi, The Doors, The Who, Led Zeppelin, the Mamas and Papas, so many others. The energy of it all is still breathtaking.
Not to diss the music of the era that came immidiately after, however - the "singer songwriter" era. The early Elton John (when he was still soulful rather than all poppie and Bernie Taupin was writing the lyrics - Elton John, Elton John; 11/17/70), James Taylor, Carlie Simon's soulful early songs, and the glorious and unforgetable Tapestry by Carole King.and
to all of them.
I have every cd (of every album) that Led Zeppelin made. Same with The Who, Pink Floyd, Aerosmith, Rush, and Ozzy.
I was talking with my 18-year-old son not long ago about music back when I was in high school, and I realized that a whole lot of the big groups then are still putting out cds, and touring. I think that whole era was sort of magical, as far as rock goes. You don't see groups, or even soloists that seem to have the kind of staying power that groups from that time have. There are a ton of one-hit wonders now...there were back in the seventies too, but it just seems like more now.
My son loves Ozzy and Aerosmith, likes LZ, but thinks Floyd is a little strange. I gotta admit, Floyd is better if you're stoned, but nowadays when I hear one of their songs, it instantly transports me back, and I still enjoy it like I did back when.
and
to all of them.
