Sanders job is done, he should quit the race

[sr71plt]

The news people would tell you about Hilary riding in her van going from coffee shop to coffee, where she would talk to twenty or so people.

They did that like once--and they did it to question that as a strategy. They've shown Bernie out in public gladhanding too. This claim of gross favoritism in media coverage (other than covering every time Trump farts--mostly to make fun of him) just won't wash.

 

[sr71plt]

Pilot doesn't always watch television, but when he does they're covering him.

No, they are covering him as much as they are covering Hillary (actually, more I think) when I have CNN on. In the post debate commentary, they seem to cover him even more (as it takes longer to pull out what his programs are).

 

[Sean Renaud]

I meant they were. . .goddamn I need to fire the guy who writes my jokes.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

I meant they were. . .goddamn I need to fire the guy who writes my jokes.

Meanwhile, he is thinking he needs to fire the joke who writes the rest of each post.

Back on-topic, Hilary cannot turn out to be the person (not any type of guy) "we all thought Obama was". Not only did we see them debate each other (if I recall correctly), but regardless of who she debated, we should all know from that what type of person she is (which I personally doubt is the same one she's seeming to be since she announced candidacy this time).

That's honestly one reason I don't mind being known as a guy who "feels the Bern". It's just like a real fire I've been around to roast marshmallows & stuff... Doesn't change (that much, if at all) until it's completely over.

 

[mikey2much]

I was saying warren could be the one.

I said that Hilary wasn't the one but she could get the job started.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

I said that Hilary wasn't the one but she could get the job started.

Are you offering to be the Oswald here? As long as she lives through her term, she gets to do the job the whole time.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I doubt she'll be the last president of the United States.

 

[mikey2much]

Let me say this again for you

Are you offering to be the Oswald here? As long as she lives through her term, she gets to do the job the whole time.

Hilary has fought the fight and she lost. She fought her fight for healthcare and the public mood was much more to the right then. Hilary went down in flames. She had to change her out looks to be able to get anything done. She let herself become a moderate. In order to be seen as strong by the public, she let herself become a hawk.
She is a good politician, she goes with the prevailing public winds. That's why she is moving toward the left now.

Oswald doesn't come into the picture, I think she has earned a chance at bat, and when she is on base Warren will follow in her foot steps and go beyond where Hilary could take us.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Hilary has fought the fight and she lost. She fought her fight for healthcare and the public mood was much more to the right then. Hilary went down in flames. She had to change her out looks to be able to get anything done. She let herself become a moderate. In order to be seen as strong by the public, she let herself become a hawk.
She is a good politician, she goes with the prevailing public winds. That's why she is moving toward the left now.

Oswald doesn't come into the picture, I think she has earned a chance at bat, and when she is on base Warren will follow in her foot steps and go beyond where Hilary could take us.

You said she earned her chance at bat & she lost... Someone needs to tell her & a ton of the country; Last I checked, she was still a top candidate, & this thread's title says her only party competition needs to step down, not her.

EDIT: Somehow missed the chance to watch Kasich on "Meyers" last night... Talk about a guy whose job is done & needs to quit!

 

[sr71plt]

You said she earned her chance at bat & she lost... Someone needs to tell her & a ton of the country; Last I checked, she was still a top candidate, & this thread's title says her only party competition needs to step down, not her.

I think the reference was to her attempt to pass health care reform back in the Bill Clinton administration. She was knocked down on that. But, yes, I think that gave her valuable experience nobody else has in how to approach the issue again.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

I think the reference was to her attempt to pass health care reform back in the Bill Clinton administration. She was knocked down on that. But, yes, I think that gave her valuable experience nobody else has in how to approach the issue again.

This is why I've often thought the whole "Fool me once" thing is incorrectly-used. Sure, she tried something maybe nobody else has. However (according to you, as I don't recall), she failed. Therefore, if she tries-&-fails 2x, it's worse than just doing both once. Therefore, personally, I wouldn't bother trying again.

 

[sr71plt]

This is why I've often thought the whole "Fool me once" thing is incorrectly-used. Sure, she tried something maybe nobody else has. However (according to you, as I don't recall), she failed. Therefore, if she tries-&-fails 2x, it's worse than just doing both once. Therefore, personally, I wouldn't bother trying again.

Sorry, that's dumb. Nobody would suggest she try it exactly the same way again. And the exact same mix of reasons why she didn't get it done the first time doesn't exist anymore. Having tried it once, she has the experience of what can happen and can try it a different way the next time.

And in this vein, the "Fool me once" sequence is spot on.

Sorry, but your response was really, really dumb.

 

[JackLuis]

This is why I've often thought the whole "Fool me once" thing is incorrectly-used. Sure, she tried something maybe nobody else has. However (according to you, as I don't recall), she failed. Therefore, if she tries-&-fails 2x, it's worse than just doing both once. Therefore, personally, I wouldn't bother trying again.

I don't think she is or will. It would cost the 1% too much.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Sorry, that's dumb. Nobody would suggest she try it exactly the same way again. And the exact same mix of reasons why she didn't get it done the first time doesn't exist anymore. Having tried it once, she has the experience of what can happen and can try it a different way the next time.

And in this vein, the "Fool me once" sequence is spot on.

Sorry, but your response was really, really dumb.

As was yours.

You suggested her experience was a good thing, which I disproved. Also, since you're more-than-likely not part of her group of advisers, you have no idea what they would or would not suggest, & also no assured idea what the reason(s) for her failure was.

Barring all that, if she did "try it a different way the next time", that states clearly it's not the same way she did the previous, but that doesn't suggest, let alone guarantee the next way would be any more successful.

 

[mikey2much]

the guillotine was one a symbol of public dissatisfaction

I don't think she is or will. It would cost the 1% too much.

Too much public unrest and dissatisfaction can lead to more expensive cures than just higher taxes for the rich and powerful.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Too much public unrest and dissatisfaction can lead to more expensive cures than just higher taxes for the rich and powerful.

If only that were true...

Watch Sanders on a talk show, or read an interview with him in any publication, & one thing becomes obvious: Even if he wins the Presidency, nothing he speaks about will change. Why?! Because he is well-aware of what the public is upset about, but talks about what can/will happen if/when groups of the public/citizenry get out & voice their opinions (be it an "Occupy"-type move or something else).

It seems to me a large number of people vote for certain candidates b/c of opinions they share & the like. But if you ask/expect those same people to speak-out/act-out b/c of the opinion? Not gonna happen.

 

[sr71plt]

You suggested her experience was a good thing, which I disproved.

Yes it is and no you didn't. Just keep rolling right along, don't you?

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Yes it is and no you didn't. Just keep rolling right along, don't you?

That sounds more like you.... Thought this was mainly a place for opinions, but some members seem to like to state things as facts that are not.

I don't keep rolling at all... I disprove you, & you pretend that never happened, (The latter is much like Hilary, hence her potentially being our 2nd "President Clinton". Don't citizens & Secret Service still have to call him that?!)

 

[The_Trouvere]

Bernie is a shill for the Zionist, just another Marxist trying to stir the pot and cause racial and class division, to weaken us for the coming attack!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivTwuqZXgao