SC Prude Wants To Block Sites Like This From Homes

Typical Yanks! Got it arse backwards as usual. Liberals are all about free speech and the rights of the individual. Conservatives are all about controlling what is said and by whom.


Sounds like a $20 hidden tax or surcharge on each new comp bought in SC. I'm sure the capitalist marketers and retailers will lobby to defeat it long before the people have a chance to weigh in.

Liberals are about free speech and individual rights, both with heavy PC limitations. Conservatives are about free speech and limitations on individual rights.
 
Liberals are about free speech and individual rights, both with heavy PC limitations. Conservatives are about free speech and limitations on individual rights.

If you toss in the PC limitations you hopefully can avoid the death/rape threats from conservatives when you insult The Leader.

The individual right to threaten with death or rape when your ideals are insulted.
 
Maybe where you're at....but not in the USA.
Yes, in the USA.
Two recent examples in the news.
"Opening up libel laws"
Loss of citizenship for burning the US flag, which is specifically prohibited by the constitution.
 
I told you, you Yanks have it arse backwards.

Or perhaps the labels liberal and conservative are just that 'labels'.

They are just labels.

Our "conservatives" for the most part don't want to conserve shit.

And our "Liberals" fucking HATE HATE HATE liberty the very core principal of their namesake any time it's inconvenient to their agenda which is most of the time if you're not a rich elite (D).

Except when it's about things they don't agree with.

Same with "Liberals" ....they just call what they don't agree with "hate speech" and scream and moan about how racist anyone who doesn't agree with them is.

They also fucking HATE capitalism (free commerce) and prefer a totalitarian style socialist spoon fed existence, economic Liberty BAD!!!


Yes, in the USA.

No, not in the USA, neither liberals or conservatives hold to their core principals in this country for shit.

Both sides sell the fuck out in the blink of an eye EVERY TIME! And have without fail for like 50+ years now......

The handful of people in all of government who actually are principled beyond the almighty dollar are all labeled unelectable lunatics.

Two recent examples in the news.
Loss of citizenship for burning the US flag, which is specifically prohibited by the constitution.

DJT the life long democrat and hugely left leaning suddenly (R), talking shit, is not only not conservatism but it also doesn't even fit on the spectrum of conservative ideology with regard to 1A.
 
Last edited:
Our Liberal Party is very much aligned with Justin's old man. Very much for grand old institutions. Liberals have formed 70% of Canada's governments over the last near 150 years. Which makes us politically a very stable country.

P.E. Trudeau

The Just Society will be one in which the rights of minorities will be safe from the whims of intolerant majorities. The Just Society will be one in which those regions and groups which have not fully shared in the country's affluence will be given a better opportunity. The Just Society will be one where such urban problems as housing and pollution will be attacked through the application of new knowledge and new techniques. The Just Society will be one in which our Indian and Inuit populations will be encouraged to assume the full rights of citizenship through policies which will give them both greater responsibility for their own future and more meaningful equality of opportunity. The Just Society will be a united Canada, united because all of its citizens will be actively involved in the development of a country where equality of opportunity is ensured and individuals are permitted to fulfill themselves in the fashion they judge best.

Our Conservative Party is neo-liberal straight out of the Wiki definition

Neoliberalism refers primarily to the 20th century resurgence of 19th century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism. These include extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization, fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy.

The New Democratic Party leans more towards democratic socialism instead of social democracy like the two other parties. It was Tommy Douglas as Premier of Saskatchewan and leader of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation that gave us UHC. The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation regime in Saskatchewan was the first democratic socialist government in North America.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Democratic_Party#Ideological_orientation

New Democrats are proud of our political and activist heritage, and our long record of visionary, practical, and successful governments. That heritage and that record have distinguished and inspired our party since the creation of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation in 1933 and the founding of the New Democratic Party in 1961.

New Democrats seek a future that brings together the best of the insights and objectives of Canadians who, within the social democratic and democratic socialist traditions, have worked through farmer, labour, co-operative, feminist, human rights and environmental movements, and with First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples, to build a more just, equal, and sustainable Canada within a global community dedicated to the same goals.


The Liberals generally rule Canada. We let the Conservatives in periodically when the Liberals lose touch with voters or get caught in a scandal. The NDP are spoilers typically enough will desert the NDP to vote against the Conservatives.

The Bloc Quebecois was formed by separatists Conservatives and Liberals.
 
TSame with "Liberals" ....they just call what they don't agree with "hate speech" and scream and moan about how racist anyone who doesn't agree with them is.
How many bills have they introduced in congress banning certain speech?


DJT the life long democrat and hugely left leaning suddenly (R), talking shit, is not only not conservatism but it also doesn't even fit on the spectrum of conservative ideology with regard to 1A.
Let's wait and see who sponsors and votes in favor of the bills.
 
Last edited:
How many bills have they introduced in congress banning certain speech?

I don't really care to count and cite every single time.

I do know Clinton and Gore went after Eminem for speech they didn't like and it wasn't the first or last time. Various public universities have effectively banned a number of conservative speakers on bullshit security concerns.

If you want to persist in the perfect (D) narrative that (D)'s are all pro free speech even when that speech irks their tits...knock yourself out but I'm not buying.

Let's wait and see who sponsors and votes in favor of the bills.

I don't even think there will be bills.
 
Last edited:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-rowe/sorry-ann-coulter-canadas_b_513865.html

Sorry Ann Coulter, Canada’s Just Not That Into You

The larger question is why the conservative lioness Time magazine once branded “Ms. Right” is schlepping across Canada like a road-company of Cats in order to lecture Canadians on “media bias” and “political correctness.” Canadians invented political correctness. What’s next on Coulter’s travel itinerary? Lecturing Parisians on disdain? Lecturing the Swiss on making cheese? Lecturing Texans on how to play football?

The enduring irony of Coulter being driven off like a vampire bat in some Hammer horror film by 200 Canadian kids exercising not only their free speech, their right to lawful protest, but their right to assembly, is rich indeed. So are her subsequent complaints about being “suppressed.”

Like the liberal “whining” she endlessly derides, her own whining this week about how she was treated by the scary Canadian students sounded tinny and false. It’s hard to believe it doesn’t sound just as false to her. Apparently free speech, at least in this case, was only ever intended to apply to Ann Coulter.
 
I don't really care to count and cite every single time.

I do know Clinton and Gore went after Eminem for speech they didn't like and it wasn't the first or last time. Various public universities have effectively banned a number of conservative speakers on bullshit security concerns.
:confused: What legislation did Clinton and Gore push about Eminen's speech?

I do know that Gore was behind the v-chip, but at least that wasn't a proactive ban, that let parents block stuff if they wanted to.

If you want to persist in the perfect (D) narrative that (D)'s are all pro free speech even when that speech irks their tits...knock yourself out but I'm not buying.
I never said they were perfect. But the only thing I can find about Clinton wanting legal "anti-free-speech" remedies is her vow to overturn Citizens Untied.

I don't even think there will be bills.
Not about flag burning, but there will be a constitutional amendment prohibiting it.
 
Anyone with half a brain isn't in to coulter.

I wonder if she was going to lecture too on how Canada sent troops to Vietnam..

I can't imagine how anyone thought she would go over well. Especially with young university types. I'm thinking the 10k she got per speech had a lot to do with it. Plus generate some publicity. No such thing as bad publicity.

Her trip was brought about by the International Free Press Society and Ezra Levant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Free_Press_Society
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezra_Levant#Political_activism

I'm not surprised that racists are some of the biggest supporters of unlimited free speech. I find it a bit weird that many 'conservatives' would align themselves with such people. IMO, the Koch brothers are far better examples of conservative types. Even if I do not agree with all their views. They are not intrinsically evil or stupid.
 
:confused: What legislation did Clinton and Gore push about Eminen's speech?

They wanted him and any other rapper who spoke obscenely about women to have sales of any kind banned under some discrimination laws back in the 90's, oh and Marilyn Manson because think of the CHILDREN!!

But they got their bullshit called and sent packing.

Looked great for (D) soccer moms though!! Image first...

Not about flag burning, but there will be a constitutional amendment prohibiting it.

Oh bullshit, put the hysterical "HITLER IS COMING!!!" left wing rags down...there won't even be a convention, unless libbies continue to piss everyone the fuck off with their insane 'let's pretend it's the 50's again!! FOR FUN!!!' social justice fantasies and the (R)'s actually manage to gain even MORE ground.

Which is possible, as it seems they are largely hellbent on doing just that.

But even if it happens I seriously doubt we will get a fuckin' anti flag burning amendment.
 
Last edited:
(edited)

They wanted him and any other rapper who spoke obscenely about women to have sales of any kind banned under some discrimination laws back in the 90's, oh and Marilyn Manson because think of the CHILDREN!!

But they got their bullshit called and sent packing.

Looked great for (D) soccer moms though!! Image first...
https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

Not banned, only labeled.

Producers and broadcasters banned certain acts and songs, and still do. It's their right as Americans.

Please, before you post again, look up the facts.
 
Not banned, only labeled.

Labled and censored yes.

But also prohibited because nobody should be able to talk about women like that!!

The push to stop Marilyn Manson and Eminem in the late 90's after libs tried to blame Columbine on them was real. Suburban soccer moms the nation over wanted those mother fuckers put down like rabid dogs.

Think of the Children!

Producers and broadcasters banned certain acts and songs, and still do. It's their right as Americans.

But it's not the right of the government.

You like most leftist seem to struggle to make the distinction between voluntary actions between two private parties, and the government putting a gun to someones head.

Please, before you post again, look up the facts.

Please, before you post again, look up the facts and lick my balls.
 
Sounds like a posse of senator's wives riding out with guns a-blazing. Did that make you piss in your boots?

No government action. No government enforcement. Not even plans for any. You're wrong again.
 
Sounds like a posse of senator's wives riding out with guns a-blazing. Did that make you piss in your boots?

No it made me laugh.

No government action. No government enforcement. Not even plans for any. You're wrong again.

They tried dude...more than a few states did too. They all got put in check like the rest of the moral busy bodies like yourself.

I'm not wrong. They just didn't get very far, thank god we aren't a democracy eh?

If democracy had it's way we wouldn't all be rock stars in the dope shoe or rap gods now would we?
 
That's why the Fuzz are trying to get websites to stop selling tshirts they don't approve of.

When has this ever happened? I do know that Liberals will expel or suspend students from school for wearing t-shirts or other clothing with American flags or portraying armed American soldiers. I can show you examples where this has happened in CA.
 
Last edited:
When has this ever happened?


The past few days. They've already forced Walmart into submission and are now going after Amazon.



They also forced eBay to stop selling legal devices years ago because of what some people MIGHT do with them - namely blue and red lights among other things. An awful lot of volunteer firefighters can buy or sell them even though they are legally allowed to use them.
 
The past few days. They've already forced Walmart into submission and are now going after Amazon.

What did they force Wal Mart to do??

They also forced eBay to stop selling legal devices years ago because of what some people MIGHT do with them

I'm betting based off your other wildly left posting habits you support strict gun control if not outright shit canning 2A.
 
Back
Top