SC Prude Wants To Block Sites Like This From Homes

[phrodeau]

Do a search on "Walmart bows to pressure." Walmart is a round-heel for any group, but mainly religious ones.

 

[Boxlicker101]

http://www.ibtimes.com/walmart-bull...hing-be-pulled-shelves-after-pressure-2463602

That site seems to play fast and loose with the truth, but this might be accurate. I can readily understand why the cops would not want a gang of cutthroats to be armored.

 

[jaF0]

That site seems to play fast and loose with the truth, but this might be accurate. I can readily understand why the cops would not want a gang of cutthroats to be armored.

Do a search, pick your own preferred news site. The story facts are the same. Infringement of free speech regarding a legal t-shirt.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Putting bulletproof on a t-shirt does not make it body armour.

 

[BotanyBoy]

http://www.ibtimes.com/walmart-bull...hing-be-pulled-shelves-after-pressure-2463602

That was a police organization, making a polite request.

Not the police as a force of government infringing upon anyone's 1A rights to free speech.

Do a search, pick your own preferred news site. The story facts are the same. Infringement of free speech regarding a legal t-shirt.

It's not an infringement of free speech for one group to ask another not to sell a certain item.

It's an infringement of free speech for the government to force it.

What is with the left and their total inability to distinguish voluntary private interactions and government force???

 

[jaF0]

That was a police organization, making a polite request.

Dude, da Fuzz is da FUZZ!

They have vays .....

 

[Hard_Rom]

That was a police organization, making a polite request.

Not the police as a force of government infringing upon anyone's 1A rights to free speech.
It's not an infringement of free speech for one group to ask another not to sell a certain item.
It's an infringement of free speech for the government to force it.
What is with the left and their total inability to distinguish voluntary private interactions and government force???

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-rowe/sorry-ann-coulter-canadas_b_513865.html

Perfectly acceptable to you than, eh?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Dude, da Fuzz is da FUZZ!

They have vays .....

Uh hua...
http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/burnoutparadise/images/6/64/Beer-cat.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100726162651

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-rowe/sorry-ann-coulter-canadas_b_513865.html

Perfectly acceptable to you than, eh?

Canada being socialist word police control freaks and Annd Coulter being a bitch?

Yea why would I give a shit?

 

[phrodeau]

Labled and censored yes.

But also prohibited because nobody should be able to talk about women like that!!

The push to stop Marilyn Manson and Eminem in the late 90's after libs tried to blame Columbine on them was real. Suburban soccer moms the nation over wanted those mother fuckers put down like rabid dogs.

Think of the Children!



But it's not the right of the government.

You like most leftist seem to struggle to make the distinction between voluntary actions between two private parties, and the government putting a gun to someones head.



Please, before you post again, look up the facts and lick my balls.

That was a police organization, making a polite request.

Not the police as a force of government infringing upon anyone's 1A rights to free speech.



It's not an infringement of free speech for one group to ask another not to sell a certain item.

It's an infringement of free speech for the government to force it.

What is with the left and their total inability to distinguish voluntary private interactions and government force???

Got that all figured out yet?

Honestly, I think it must be the difference between when you're posting sober and when you're stoned.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Got that all figured out yet?

Having trouble differentiating between government force and a private request again?

Honestly, I think it must be the difference between when you're posting sober and when you're stoned.

Then you'd think wrong, again.

 

[phrodeau]

Having trouble differentiating between government force and a private request again?



Then you'd think wrong, again.

You are convinced of government censorship, except when you are not.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You are convinced of government censorship,

PAC's, Elected officials, appointees and bureaucrats trying to censor controversial musical acts = government censorship yes.

except when you are not.

No I'm pretty sure the Fraternal Order of Police don't carry the force of law nor did they lobby to have the shirts pulled by force.

If you can find evidence to support otherwise I'd be happy to change my position.

But until then a polite request from a private organization and voluntary compliance =/= force of law and is thus not government censorship.

Get here faster phro......

 

[phrodeau]

PAC's, Elected officials, appointees and bureaucrats trying to censor controversial musical acts = government censorship yes.



No I'm pretty sure the Fraternal Order of Police don't carry the force of law nor did they lobby to have the shirts pulled by force.

If you can find evidence to support otherwise I'd be happy to change my position.

But until then a polite request and voluntary compliance =/= force of law.

Senator's wives are not elected officials.

 

[Hard_Rom]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness#Right-wing_political_correctness

In 2012, Paul Krugman wrote that "the big threat to our discourse is right-wing political correctness, which – unlike the liberal version – has lots of power and money behind it. And the goal is very much the kind of thing Orwell tried to convey with his notion of Newspeak: to make it impossible to talk, and possibly even think, about ideas that challenge the established order."[24]

In a 2015 Harris poll it was found that "Republicans are almost twice as likely – 42 percent vs. 23 percent – as Democrats to say that “there are any books that should be banned completely.”...Republicans were also more likely to say that some video games, movies and television programs should be banned."[93][94]

 

[BotanyBoy]

Senator's wives are not elected officials.

The President and Vice President of the United States are.

And the political action committee those Senator's wives are part of/run push for application of government censorship.

Once again...not the same thing as a request by a private organization and voluntary compliance from a corporation.


Force of law = government censorship.

Consenting interactions between two non government entities =/= government censorship.

It's not rocket science prho.

 

[phrodeau]

(edited)

And the political action committee those Senator's wives are part of/run push for application of government censorship.

Once again...not the same thing as a request by a private organization and voluntary compliance from a corporation.

Yes, it is. PACs are private organizations.

 

[Hard_Rom]

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ward-anderson/political-correctness_b_9617626.html

Political Correctness Is A Right-Wing Myth

“There is no such thing as "political correctness." Not when those who complain about the world being too easily offended find themselves so easily offended.

“For all the talk about how Liberals can't take a joke, enough conservatives complained about a joke that David Letterman had to make an apology to Sarah Palin for it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Yes, it is. PACs are private organizations.

Pushing for political action, which means government force.

Which is still not the same as a request and voluntary compliance between two private entities.

 

[BotanyBoy]

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ward-anderson/political-correctness_b_9617626.html

Political Correctness Is A Right-Wing Myth

“There is no such thing as "political correctness." Not when those who complain about the world being too easily offended find themselves so easily offended.

LOL

What a profoundly stupid thing to say.

 

[phrodeau]

Pushing for political action, which means government force.

Which is still not the same as a request and voluntary compliance between two private entities.

OK, you are going to have to come up with a specific example. The only one I can find is the PMRC, which pushed for voluntary labeling and not government action.

 

[BotanyBoy]

OK, you are going to

No I'm not.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Right wingers and Republicans and Conservatives are the most hypocritical a-holes on the planet. Hypocrisy is their middle name.

i.e. attacking Hillary for her "Wall Street Ties" and "Goldman Sachs" and then stuffing the Cabinet with "Wall Street" people and "Goldman Sachs."

Crying their eyes out over poor poor Ivanka, while cheering on the Pussy Grabber in Chief.

Calling themselves Christians while voting for a lying, hypocritical racist cheater rapist

Whining about the left being "PC" while crying their eyes out over "Xmas" and Starbucks cups

Whining that Dems have to "get over it" while electing a birther and never accepting BO as a legitimate president.

Calling themselves "patriots" while cheering on Putin's Puppet

The list goes on and on and on

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ward-anderson/political-correctness_b_9617626.html

Political Correctness Is A Right-Wing Myth

“There is no such thing as "political correctness." Not when those who complain about the world being too easily offended find themselves so easily offended.

“For all the talk about how Liberals can't take a joke, enough conservatives complained about a joke that David Letterman had to make an apology to Sarah Palin for it.

 

[Hard_Rom]

LOL

What a profoundly stupid thing to say.

Might have to take that as an expert opinion on stupid. You are bloody thick, mate!

 

[BotanyBoy]

Might have to take that as an expert opinion on stupid. You are bloody thick, mate!

“There is no such thing as "political correctness." Not when those who complain about the world being too easily offended find themselves so easily offended."


A parties level of offense doesn't make political correctness a myth in any way shape form or fashion. It might make another group hypocritical, but hypocrisy doesn't make political correctness a myth either.

The suggestion that it does is fucking idiotic.

So I may be 'bloody thick, mate!' ....but at least I don't regurgitate idiotic total lies just because they sound pro social justice and come from HuffPo.

 

[jaF0]

In a 2015 Harris poll it was found that "Republicans are almost twice as likely – 42 percent vs. 23 percent – as Democrats to say that “there are any books that should be banned completely.”...Republicans were also more likely to say that some video games, movies and television programs should be banned."

And ice cream too.

Don't forget the ice cream.

http://www.masslive.com/talk/index.ssf/2011/10/ben_jerrys_schweddy_balls_ice.html