The Trump Davos speech.

he was a jug deep into the hooch last night when he created this mess.

now that he's probably sober, he will claim it was a bait thread to piss off the libtards.

never have a group of people chose to make themselves look like retards in order to "own" someone.
Chan and ish are happy to lead the pedo retards in their plight to groom children and destroy America.
 
Hey, shit for brains!

View attachment 2591652

View attachment 2591653


He kept calling Greenland "Iceland" because he's a senile dipshit.

The fact that you think his incoherent rambling was anything other than a disaster only proves that you're a bigger idiot than him.

From these links one can only conclude trump is unbalanced and unbalanced.

And the OP should be embarrassed if he thinks grandpa gave Europe a strong and unambiguous message.
 
Will the monkeys please stop throwing poop all over the zoo house? Try to curb your rage because it truly does control your zoo-like behavior.

Now, ask yourself (without reaching for poop again in the form of Orange Man bad, senile, pedophile, pig, etc ), why is Trump laser focused on Greenland - because on the surface it looks/feels like it's from left field?

Trump's is a businessman first, politician second. He views Greenland as essential to the business (the business being the United States). Trump asserts that China and Russia have acted aggressively in support of their own interests (understandingly) - the South China Sea and Ukraine, respectively, jump to mind. Furthermore, both use the global trade in critical minerals as a political bludgeon.

Whether you agree or not with Trump's assertions is irrelevant because (long before Trump started playing a shell game with tariffs), the World Trade Organization has been used isince it's early 1990s inception to bludgeon competitive nations economically (albeit slower, with more smiles, and typically less bloodshed).

Putting America first, as China and Russia have done, businessman Trump looks to see what areas would provide the biggest bang for the buck - critical mineral-wise. Although largely unknown, untapped Greenland is it (recall, Antarctica is off-limits because of the long-standing Antarctic Treaty System).

But there's a problem with Greenland, it's possessed by the Danes who re-acquired it after the fall of Nazi Germany. And no offense to Denmark, but it's highly unlikely, if another "my country first" nation (I'm looking at you China and Russia) invaded, that it could hold the island. NATO might respond, but Trump thinks, "Let's not even let it get to NATO needing to respond!"

How does he avert a shooting war over Greenland? He's going to treat it like he would a business deal. And if you read Art of the Deal, you'd realize that Trump's actions mirror its principles. Always lead with your most aggressive position, knowing that the final, eventual agreement will reflect what your actual (unspoken - publicly anyway) goals were with the deal.

The left field "feel" to this approach is that most Americans are totally unaware of just how constrained the nation's access and supply to critical minerals actually are. If those get curtailed (or worst - shut down), the American economic engine will falter and fail (not might) - if China has no qualms about dumping T-bills to the detriment of its own economy, restraining critical resources to hurt America is a no brainer. Of course, Trump isn't going to headline this fact because it represents a weakness, and why reveal that publicly to your competitors (they'll only use the weakness against your negotiating position or move to make it happen)?

Add to this Trump's "brusque and brash" business style, and heads are not only turning but popping, as well.

So, you may agree or disagree on the bits and pieces or even the whole enchilada, buuut - you can't claim Trump isnt putting America's (and by extension - the world's) interests first. This isn't senility, racism, or even just being a meany driving the Greenland push (as much as some feign it is). It's sound business practice.

kk - start slinging the poop again. Lord knows you positively cannot resist it 💩
Shut up. Trump is not putting the world's interest and safety first.

You protect pedophiles you pig.
 
Will the monkeys please stop throwing poop all over the zoo house? Try to curb your rage because it truly does control your zoo-like behavior.

Now, ask yourself (without reaching for poop again in the form of Orange Man bad, senile, pedophile, pig, etc ), why is Trump laser focused on Greenland - because on the surface it looks/feels like it's from left field?

Trump's is a businessman first, politician second. He views Greenland as essential to the business (the business being the United States). Trump asserts that China and Russia have acted aggressively in support of their own interests (understandingly) - the South China Sea and Ukraine, respectively, jump to mind. Furthermore, both use the global trade in critical minerals as a political bludgeon.

Whether you agree or not with Trump's assertions is irrelevant because (long before Trump started playing a shell game with tariffs), the World Trade Organization has been used isince it's early 1990s inception to bludgeon competitive nations economically (albeit slower, with more smiles, and typically less bloodshed).

Putting America first, as China and Russia have done, businessman Trump looks to see what areas would provide the biggest bang for the buck - critical mineral-wise. Although largely unknown, untapped Greenland is it (recall, Antarctica is off-limits because of the long-standing Antarctic Treaty System).

But there's a problem with Greenland, it's possessed by the Danes who re-acquired it after the fall of Nazi Germany. And no offense to Denmark, but it's highly unlikely, if another "my country first" nation (I'm looking at you China and Russia) invaded, that it could hold the island. NATO might respond, but Trump thinks, "Let's not even let it get to NATO needing to respond!"

How does he avert a shooting war over Greenland? He's going to treat it like he would a business deal. And if you read Art of the Deal, you'd realize that Trump's actions mirror its principles. Always lead with your most aggressive position, knowing that the final, eventual agreement will reflect what your actual (unspoken - publicly anyway) goals were with the deal.

The left field "feel" to this approach is that most Americans are totally unaware of just how constrained the nation's access and supply to critical minerals actually are. If those get curtailed (or worst - shut down), the American economic engine will falter and fail (not might) - if China has no qualms about dumping T-bills to the detriment of its own economy, restraining critical resources to hurt America is a no brainer. Of course, Trump isn't going to headline this fact because it represents a weakness, and why reveal that publicly to your competitors (they'll only use the weakness against your negotiating position or move to make it happen)?

Add to this Trump's "brusque and brash" business style, and heads are not only turning but popping, as well.

So, you may agree or disagree on the bits and pieces or even the whole enchilada, buuut - you can't claim Trump isnt putting America's (and by extension - the world's) interests first. This isn't senility, racism, or even just being a meany driving the Greenland push (as much as some feign it is). It's sound business practice.

kk - start slinging the poop again. Lord knows you positively cannot resist it 💩
What is it with Playgrounders who come into the PB with holier than thou attitudes, and immediately reveal themselves to be Trumpsuckers.
 
Will the monkeys please stop throwing poop all over the zoo house? Try to curb your rage because it truly does control your zoo-like behavior.

Now, ask yourself (without reaching for poop again in the form of Orange Man bad, senile, pedophile, pig, etc ), why is Trump laser focused on Greenland - because on the surface it looks/feels like it's from left field?

Trump's is a businessman first, politician second. He views Greenland as essential to the business (the business being the United States). Trump asserts that China and Russia have acted aggressively in support of their own interests (understandingly) - the South China Sea and Ukraine, respectively, jump to mind. Furthermore, both use the global trade in critical minerals as a political bludgeon.

Whether you agree or not with Trump's assertions is irrelevant because (long before Trump started playing a shell game with tariffs), the World Trade Organization has been used isince it's early 1990s inception to bludgeon competitive nations economically (albeit slower, with more smiles, and typically less bloodshed).

Putting America first, as China and Russia have done, businessman Trump looks to see what areas would provide the biggest bang for the buck - critical mineral-wise. Although largely unknown, untapped Greenland is it (recall, Antarctica is off-limits because of the long-standing Antarctic Treaty System).

But there's a problem with Greenland, it's possessed by the Danes who re-acquired it after the fall of Nazi Germany. And no offense to Denmark, but it's highly unlikely, if another "my country first" nation (I'm looking at you China and Russia) invaded, that it could hold the island. NATO might respond, but Trump thinks, "Let's not even let it get to NATO needing to respond!"

How does he avert a shooting war over Greenland? He's going to treat it like he would a business deal. And if you read Art of the Deal, you'd realize that Trump's actions mirror its principles. Always lead with your most aggressive position, knowing that the final, eventual agreement will reflect what your actual (unspoken - publicly anyway) goals were with the deal.

The left field "feel" to this approach is that most Americans are totally unaware of just how constrained the nation's access and supply to critical minerals actually are. If those get curtailed (or worst - shut down), the American economic engine will falter and fail (not might) - if China has no qualms about dumping T-bills to the detriment of its own economy, restraining critical resources to hurt America is a no brainer. Of course, Trump isn't going to headline this fact because it represents a weakness, and why reveal that publicly to your competitors (they'll only use the weakness against your negotiating position or move to make it happen)?

Add to this Trump's "brusque and brash" business style, and heads are not only turning but popping, as well.

So, you may agree or disagree on the bits and pieces or even the whole enchilada, buuut - you can't claim Trump isnt putting America's (and by extension - the world's) interests first. This isn't senility, racism, or even just being a meany driving the Greenland push (as much as some feign it is). It's sound business practice.

kk - start slinging the poop again. Lord knows you positively cannot resist it 💩

Wow!! That is a lot of interesting.. and utterly unnecessary words.

Do you feel better now?

Okay, then I will begin:
  • I do not care about your presidents personal feelings, needs or wants.
  • I care about international law and order.
  • I care about the sovereignty of countries and people.
  • I care about facts.
You cannot take a country just because you feel like it would be a good thing.
We are not imperialists.

And would NATO respond, in that very unlikely scenario where Greenland was attacked?

I do not know, I think you would know that better than me:

Your country is the only country who has ever activated Article 5!!
- Your country is the only one who has ever asked NATO to go to war for them.

- we lost just as many precious soldiers as you did.. think about it, you are more than 300 millions, we are 6 millions. And we lost the same amount of loved ones.

Do not make us regret it, do not make us recent you.

Thank you.
 
Definitely wouldn't be the first time.

I like the way they produce them, and try to alter the way they talk.

- Even testing how far they can go in their ridiculous word-salad-stew, when they pretend to be women.

A fresh profile, some few posts in the PG for authenticity? But.. other than that: a fresh and clean profile with no posting history that goes back further than one week.

And with that many words to share, it seems unlikely that the profile would have stayed that silent until now. 😉🤦🏼‍♀️
 
It truly is fascinating; I'll invite you to one of the retreats focusing on creating alternative accounts. It's very MKULTRA; you'd ❤️ it. I'll make sure you get a sweatshirt as a souvenir 😄

Hey, just for shits and giggles, Google my username and see what gets returned. Heck, you could even pretend you're doing "research." I've been around for a bit. Now - catch 💩

I am sorry, but I need to decline your offer.. you see: if I had to make an ALT, pretending to be a man, doing that sex-change-thingy.. I would have to become ULTRA-CHAD-MAN... And that would probably hurt someone's feelings.

🤷🏼‍♀️
 
tsk, tsk, tsk - this sort of thinking is antithetical to the principles of DEI. We should be welcoming of all types and never shame another's self-identication - unless you're only pretending that actually matters... "girl" 🤔
All the transwomen I know put a great deal of effort into performing feminity—often more than many cis women.

Being trans is much more than just “self-identification”.
 
He went in there and slapped them into reality. He kicked Macron in the pussy as well.
No he didn't. They all mocked his feeble attempt at leadership.

America is the laughing stock of the world. You're just a bunch of pedo nazis. You need to wake the fuck up old man.
 
He went in there and slapped them into reality. He kicked Macron in the pussy as well.
Trump: blah blah blah Iceland!
Leavitt: No, he meant GREENLAND
Me: the video clearly has him saying ICELAND
Leavitt: LOOK AT THE OFFICIAL WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT: GREENLAND GREENLAND GREENLAND!!


....and notice how once again Lit's most seriously closeted homosexual takes great pains to emasculate threats to the Mad King....
 
My apologies, I suppose...? I thought varied viewpoints were welcomed - diversity, you know. Had I known only one perspective is allowed, I might not have voiced an opinion - holy or unholy. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea máxima culpa.
There's that holier than thou attitude, again.
 
Trump: blah blah blah Iceland!
Leavitt: No, he meant GREENLAND
Me: the video clearly has him saying ICELAND
Leavitt: LOOK AT THE OFFICIAL WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT: GREENLAND GREENLAND GREENLAND!!


....and notice how once again Lit's most seriously closeted homosexual takes great pains to emasculate threats to the Mad King....
Here's my onomatopoeic attempt to describe what Rob was willing to tolerate under Joe Biden for four years when he was was trying to make a point: “Blblblrrrffft! Pbbtthh... glurrrrgh… splut-tsshh!” :rolleyes:
 
All the transwomen I know put a great deal of effort into performing feminity—often more than many cis women.

Being trans is much more than just “self-identification”.
Because it's a "performance" of something that doesn't come naturally.
 
Here's my onomatopoeic attempt to describe what Rob was willing to tolerate under Joe Biden for four years when he was was trying to make a point: “Blblblrrrffft! Pbbtthh... glurrrrgh… splut-tsshh!” :rolleyes:
So you think it’s ok then just becaus Biden……..🙄
 
Trump: blah blah blah Iceland!
Leavitt: No, he meant GREENLAND
Me: the video clearly has him saying ICELAND
Leavitt: LOOK AT THE OFFICIAL WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT: GREENLAND GREENLAND GREENLAND!!


....and notice how once again Lit's most seriously closeted homosexual takes great pains to emasculate threats to the Mad King....
There you go again, clumsily projecting your limp little lifestyle and questionable bedroom circus onto men who actually have the balls to be real men. Spoiler alert: not everyone’s flavor of macho is stuck in the kiddie pool of your delusions.
 
So you think it’s ok then just becaus Biden……..🙄
Did I say it was true or acceptable? No, I simply pointed out what Rob was willing to tolerate silently for four years. Meanwhile, Donald Trump achieved more in his first year than Biden has managed in four. In that single year, Trump completely shifted the global balance of power.
 
Does your fascination with the genitalia and bodily fluids of other men "come naturally" to you?
Hmm?
Tell us.
Funny how you’re so obsessed with other people’s bodies, it’s almost like you’re projecting your own awkward hang-ups. Maybe spend less time policing everyone else’s business and more time figuring out your own issues. Just a thought.
 
Back
Top