The Trump Davos speech.

I may have been wrong in assuming II74 was referring to the War on Terror. But since terror is everywhere, he may have been mistaken in thinking those deaths were just for us. The truth is, even in the absence of a "coalition of the willing," we would have gone into Iraq and Afghanistan alone. That's what the Bush administration was hell-bent on doing. That isn't me agreeing with it.
 
So are allied deaths just not enough for you?

Did they need more deaths to be relevant?

If people cannot read simple statistics and make a real comparison.
Then how do you expect them to understand anything.

DEATHS PER MILLION

That is how you compare those cursed numbers.

There are 309 million Americans.. 5,5 million Danes.

But okay, people are either emotionally stunted and unable to think. Or they have never been in the military themselves, but are being pathetic keyboard warriors.

Either way, out of pedagogical reach.
 
If people cannot read simple statistics and make a real comparison.
Then how do you expect them to understand anything.

DEATHS PER MILLION

That is how you compare those cursed numbers.

There are 309 million Americans.. 5,5 million Danes.

But okay, people are either emotionally stunted and unable to think. Or they have never been in the military themselves, but are being pathetic keyboard warriors.

Either way, out of pedagogical reach.
One death is enough
 
  • Love
Reactions: Cat
We all did. My brother was nothing but devastated and broken. But, he stayed to fight the war the US had activated article 5 for.

The duty, the honour of protecting your allies.

To be called irrelevant by the same ally later on.

❤️

I want you to know for a fact certain that decent, intelligent Americans (which excludes MAGAts) do NOT consider you irrelevant.

There WILL be a day after DonOld & the MAGAts - perhaps sooner than you might imagine.

On that day, NATO / the western alliance will blaze back stronger than ever.

And then Putin, Xi, and the Ayatollah, etc, will tremble.

Stay with us.

👍

🇺🇸
 
That is factually incorrect; revisionist history is unbecoming of any political position.
So you are saying:

The NATO would never come and defend us? No Europeans would sacrifice their lives for the US.

... But you just proved me wrong, and yourself even more wrong!!

WE WILLINGLY, EAGERLY AND IMMEDIATELY CAME TO YOUR DEFENCE.

Under article 5, we all came rushing to your aid.

Yes, I was wrong: the US did not activate article 5.

It got activated for you, by your allies, who all came running.

.... And your president doubts that the NATO would ever help the US?!

Remind me.. how many years did we stay in Afghanistan? Who left first?
 
That is factually incorrect; revisionist history is unbecoming of any political position.

I’ve been told NATO was The United States..

NATO only existed because of The United States.

NATO acted at the whims of The United States.

🤔

NATO initiated article 5 = The United States initiated article 5 (under cover of the NATO banner).

😑

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Last edited:
So are allied deaths just not enough for you?

Did they need more deaths to be relevant?
I didn't say either. We thank them for their service, but Europe had terror problems of their own. In many ways, they hampered our operations on the ground. Their rules of engagement were much different than ours, which complicated a lot of supporting operations. Some NATO countries contributed smaller troop numbers or restricted deployments to "safe" areas, avoiding high-intensity combat zones. They had differing strategic priorities and approaches to the war that hampered our goals.
 
Thought you were a proud American. AMERICAN.

You know those that are not European.

... To us, you are all Americans and your need to find a connection back to Europe is laughable and hypocritical.

That was simply my only point.
And where have I claimed some foreign heritage?
 
It’s nice to finally have a strong president that gives a shit about America. However, if your brainwashed by mainstream media, you have no fucking clue about it.
If you think Trump is anything other than a complete dumbfuck and senile as fuck, you are not listening to him speak. My opinion of his retardedness has nothing to do with the media.
 
You mis-spelled, 'losers and suckers'.
Heh, many low-information MAGAs have conveniently rabbit-holed Trump's "loser and suckers" characterizations of soldiers and Marines who died in WW2, but my retired USMC neighbor sure as hell didn't.

He sued our homeowners association maybe a decade ago, challenging the restriction to that limited a single family home to only having ONE flagpole in the yard.....he wanted THREE. And he won.

Up went the United States Flag, the USMC flag, and a Trump for President flag.

The day after the "losers and suckers" comment came to light, the Trump flag disappeared that day and was never seen again.
 
Terror has NOT been "everywhere" until just a few short weeks ago, when lawyers for the Department of Homelander Security redefined "lawful public protest" as "domestic terrorism".
Reichguide with the Chan-like histrionics.
 
If you think Trump is anything other than a complete dumbfuck and senile as fuck, you are not listening to him speak. My opinion of his retardedness has nothing to do with the media.

The stock market just cowed the TACO king AGAIN, and DonOld just publicly humiliated / embarrassed himself and The United States at Davos.

But all the common MAGAts see is a powerful emperor in new clothes…

😳 😑 🤣 🤬

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat
Heh, many low-information MAGAs have conveniently rabbit-holed Trump's "loser and suckers" characterizations of soldiers and Marines who died in WW2, but my retired USMC neighbor sure as hell didn't.

He sued our homeowners association maybe a decade ago, challenging the restriction to that limited a single family home to only having ONE flagpole in the yard.....he wanted THREE. And he won.

Up went the United States Flag, the USMC flag, and a Trump for President flag.

The day after the "losers and suckers" comment came to light, the Trump flag disappeared that day and was never seen again.
From AI:
As of all credible sources and records, there is no verified evidence or credible report that Donald Trump ever called World War II veterans “losers and suckers.”


This claim appears to be a false or misleading rumor that circulated, but fact-checkers and reliable news outlets have found no proof he made such a statement.
 
More straw man arguments. Your arguments would be more coherent if you avoided logical fallacies - just saying.

What military actions were undertaken as part of that self-invoked Article 5 contingency? There were two, which were (more or less) symbolic - Operation Eagle Assist (several early warning aircraft were sent to the US and conducted 360 sorties with no casualties) and Operation Active Endeavor (several naval ships were redeployed in the Mediterranean to protect their own - that's why they were already there - and US shipping interests).

Both of these actions were (in comparison to America's historic and costly, in blood and treasure, defense of its many allies) nothing more than symbolism over substance. And you can get the same at any Golden Globe Award ceremony.

Sooo, I fail to see these allied deaths in the defense of America - focused solely on the 21st Century conflicts. God love you folks that can look into that madness and come up with a fictional history were America is the ungrateful one. But that's the suck you few have embraced - certainly not the majority of Americans✌️
Once you buy into a narrative you'll buy into any rationalization to support said narrative.
 
Terror has NOT been "everywhere" until just a few short weeks ago, when lawyers for the Department of Homelander Security redefined "lawful public protest" as "domestic terrorism".
Show me the documentation. Terror is everywhere in the developed and underdeveloped World.
 
Yeah, right...? A woman couldn't remotely provide an articulate response. Sooo, I must be a dude, who was previously banned. Is that the sum of your (and others) accusation...?

Well, you're a force to be reckoned here, and with knowledge of past yet banned users, who do you think I am...?
You are a user who was banned

Whether you choose to admit it or not isn't my issue.
 
More straw man arguments. Your arguments would be more coherent if you avoided logical fallacies - just saying.

What military actions were undertaken as part of that self-invoked Article 5 contingency? There were two, which were (more or less) symbolic - Operation Eagle Assist (several early warning aircraft were sent to the US and conducted 360 sorties with no casualties) and Operation Active Endeavor (several naval ships were redeployed in the Mediterranean to protect their own - that's why they were already there - and US shipping interests).

Both of these actions were (in comparison to America's historic and costly, in blood and treasure, defense of its many allies) nothing more than symbolism over substance. And you can get the same at any Golden Globe Award ceremony.

Sooo, I fail to see these allied deaths in the defense of America - focused solely on the 21st Century conflicts. God love you folks that can look into that madness and come up with a fictional history were America is the ungrateful one. But that's the suck you few have embraced - certainly not the majority of Americans✌️

My gods.

You are one disgusting human. You seriously make me sick to my core.

Repulsive and beyond understanding.

Well, thank you for this.

Sadly you are right now pretending to be a woman, so you cannot call me a "Karen" or yell "Reeeee".

May your God bless you.
 
Back
Top