The virtues of A.I. art

[LargoKitt]

In my opinion, one should not generalize categories and then judge about them. One should examine the rules of the game, gather knowledge around the subject, and then examine the future perspectives of the field. Ai is as good or bad as the prompts you type in, and there are thousands of new LLMs every Month, and each differs in its abilities and specifications. AI is yet at the very beginning of its existence, and if you carefully craft your prompt and learn by the way others shape visuality with language, then you will perceive: AI can be art. AI usually does not mean that you simply press a button and mutually generate an ugly image, but it rather means to carefully select your context, your perspectives, your references to artist, designer and scenery. It means, for example, to describe an image with words, optimize the prompt manually and then tell the AI it should first optimize, then convert the text to a JSON prompt for a visual AI. It is also possible to finetune the prompt with the parameters given in the JSON section.
I did not use AI so far for erotic images, but in my opinion the possibilities are already pretty widespread in the field and will induce branches like an eternally growing tree. I also love to paint with oil colors and I draw a lot and I love handwriting concepts, stories and fantasies.
What my core concerns are : Sex displayed with mere visuality lacks the feelings of the real thing, although the future might have some methodical turns ....
erotic greetings
tantrablack

There's a difference between art which has an erotic element and images of sexy scenes made to arouse us. Of course the two can overlap, but my OP is trying to make the point that if you are looking for erotic images then A.I. is an easy way to provide them. Don't pay for them.

 

[Husky_Embrace]

In my opinion, one should not generalize categories and then judge about them. One should examine the rules of the game, gather knowledge around the subject, and then examine the future perspectives of the field. Ai is as good or bad as the prompts you type in, and there are thousands of new LLMs every Month, and each differs in its abilities and specifications. AI is yet at the very beginning of its existence, and if you carefully craft your prompt and learn by the way others shape visuality with language, then you will perceive: AI can be art. AI usually does not mean that you simply press a button and mutually generate an ugly image, but it rather means to carefully select your context, your perspectives, your references to artist, designer and scenery. It means, for example, to describe an image with words, optimize the prompt manually and then tell the AI it should first optimize, then convert the text to a JSON prompt for a visual AI. It is also possible to finetune the prompt with the parameters given in the JSON section.
I did not use AI so far for erotic images, but in my opinion the possibilities are already pretty widespread in the field and will induce branches like an eternally growing tree. I also love to paint with oil colors and I draw a lot and I love handwriting concepts, stories and fantasies.
What my core concerns are : Sex displayed with mere visuality lacks the feelings of the real thing, although the future might have some methodical turns ....
erotic greetings
tantrablack

I was a Beta tester for DALL•E, now flaccidly incorporated into chatgpt. I understand what you mean. That picture generation had potential. There was a feature called inpainting/outpainting that allowed you to update parts of an image, or extend images. You could for example grab two images, set them apart, and have the AI fill in the rest. If they had build that out, you could create true art. On the iteration of parts you could create something new.

That being said, I got dissatisfied with it. The secondary reason was because it took the prompt from you in later iterations. It became a generic, highly stylised picture generator.

The primary reasons were much larger though. They just took art of others, dumped it into the learning machine, and have you pay for it while the artist gets nothing. It is plagiarism and theft. If they would buy the rights, or create their own to feed the algorithm, it would be fine. The other is cost. They form technology around them, driving up prices of tech, power and water, just so people can make 30 different pictures of a corgi balanced on a ball.

AI has many great applications. In research, in medicine. Did you know it solved enzyme folding? If applied correctly it is amazing!

LLM aren't it. They are unapologetic in their theft and cost to society. If they allowed AI to make porn at large scale it would be propelled to new heights, until they Grok it up and people realise that it might not be the technology we're hoping for.