Well, that didn't go well.

[adrina]

I was disappointed in the interview until he asked her about Biden’s competency and ‘when/how long she knew he was incompetent’. I thought that she was in a position of strength until that point…. But that’s where she fell apart.

What answer would you like to have seen her give?

 

[Rebel5soul]

It all depends on what you're looking for. She did get some zingers in on Trump, fine, that's to be expected. But in general the interview went like this;

"What is your position on ____________(fill in the blank)?"

"Trump, Trump, Trump"

"Fine, but what are you going to do about __________(fill in the blank)?"

"Well, I'm going to do something Bret. Trump, Trump, Trump."

"What is it you're going to do?"

"I've already answered that, something."

 

[adrina]

It all depends on what you're looking for. She did get some zingers in on Trump, fine, that's to be expected. But in general the interview went like this;

"What is your position on ____________(fill in the blank)?"

"Trump, Trump, Trump"

"Fine, but what are you going to do about __________(fill in the blank)?"

"Well, I'm going to do something Bret. Trump, Trump, Trump."

"What is it you're going to do?"

"I've already answered that, something."

That's a bit of an odd criticism as that is Trump's routine, and you support Trump.

Didn't you find it very odd that the interviewer asked more questions about Trump than policy positions. I also found his interruptive and aggressive nature quite ineffective as an interviewer. If the purpose of an interview is to get information, he failed.

 

[Celand]

If " salad" like: " I follow the law"... " I am speaking !" is winning, then she won this one. In my "book" she did not answer single thing and was belligerent and evasive.

 

[HisArpy]

That's a bit of an odd criticism as that is Trump's routine, and you support Trump.

Didn't you find it very odd that the interviewer asked more questions about Trump than policy positions. I also found his interruptive and aggressive nature quite ineffective as an interviewer. If the purpose of an interview is to get information, he failed.

The point of an interview is to PROMOTE YOUR AGENDA. It doesn't matter what the questions are, your job as a candidate is to promote the agenda and get the word out why you are the better candidate for the office.

Instead of doing that, Kamala bashed Trump incessantly and filibustered everything else. What is her plan to fix immigration? How is she going to reduce inflation? What is she going to do about our National Security? Israel/Iran? Ukraine? Putin? Taiwan?

Bashing Trump is all well and good out on the campaign when you're talking to your supporters and need a rousing cheer, but when you're on national TV trying to convince people that you've got a plan, people need more than "it's all Trump's fault." Especially when Trump hasn't been in office for more than 3 years and you have.

And THAT is where Kamala failed to deliver. Like usual.

 

[Buffalogurl]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/disaster-kamalaexe-crashes-fox-interview-meltdown
Classic behavior of a raging alcoholic..... from Mary Poppins to Genghis Khan in a heartbeat..... (demon possessed)...
When she takes office..... you'll receive everything you paid for

 

[HisArpy]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1846686774543921559

 

[Buffalogurl]

Just imagine this vegetable salad, negotiating with a real life leader such as president Putin or the leader of Iran..... f@#k me to tears might as well bring the boomers to launch depth, get this show on the road.....

 

[Rotadom]

Kamala bashed Trump incessantly She answered all of the interviewer's insesant questions about the felon.

Fixed for the truth.

 

[Rotadom]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1846686774543921559

That would be the only way the trumpettes would win.

Just imagine this vegetable salad, negotiating with a real life leader such as president Putin or the leader of Iran..... f@#k me to tears might as well bring the boomers to launch depth, get this show on the road.....

Not a chance, bro.

 

[HisArpy]

Fixed for the truth.

Not even close dooRmat.

Maybe you think so in your alternate universe, but, in this reality, most of the press is negative about her performance.

 

[Buffalogurl]

The point of an interview is to PROMOTE YOUR AGENDA. It doesn't matter what the questions are, your job as a candidate is to promote the agenda and get the word out why you are the better candidate for the office.

Instead of doing that, Kamala bashed Trump incessantly and filibustered everything else. What is her plan to fix immigration? How is she going to reduce inflation? What is she going to do about our National Security? Israel/Iran? Ukraine? Putin? Taiwan?

Bashing Trump is all well and good out on the campaign when you're talking to your supporters and need a rousing cheer, but when you're on national TV trying to convince people that you've got a plan, people need more than "it's all Trump's fault." Especially when Trump hasn't been in office for more than 3 years and you have.

And THAT is where Kamala failed to deliver. Like usual.

Exactly..... it's Trump's fault is their goto.... the current crime family in power has had 4 years to "rectify" all the "evil" that Trump committed .... and yet here we are ...

 

[Rotadom]

most of the press is negative about her performance

Prove it.

 

[Terrylipstick]

What answer would you like to have seen her give?

I’d love to hear the truth. “Yeah, we knew he was a drooling fool in 2020, but the Party wanted him in the seat because he’s easy to manipulate. It all went perfectly until he shit himself on live TV while debating Trump and we couldn’t hide it anymore. That’s when the party pinned me as the hand-picked successor… Here I am!”

Neither party has a candidate worth a shit. Trump is a bully and Harris is a mouthpiece for special interest.

 

[DeluxAuto]

That’s when the party pinned me as the hand-picked successor…

Vice President.

Words have meanings.

 

[Terrylipstick]

Vice President.

Words have meanings.

And I’d be with you if the drooling fool would have resigned. Otherwise… the people have the right to the primary to choose their representative. What we saw the Democratic Party do in July-August was something out of North Korea.

 

[Terrylipstick]

And I’d be with you if the drooling fool would have resigned. Otherwise… the people have the right to the primary to choose their representative. What we saw the Democratic Party do in July-August was something out of North Korea.

If she’d primaried against Biden and any other democrat contenders she’d have gotten her ass kicked…. Again

 

[DeluxAuto]

was something out of North Korea.

Did Kim write a beautiful letter to trump about it?

 

[Bn2f]

The point of an interview is to PROMOTE YOUR AGENDA. It doesn't matter what the questions are, your job as a candidate is to promote the agenda and get the word out why you are the better candidate for the office.

Instead of doing that, Kamala bashed Trump incessantly and filibustered everything else. What is her plan to fix immigration? How is she going to reduce inflation? What is she going to do about our National Security? Israel/Iran? Ukraine? Putin? Taiwan?

These 2 things do not match up. You can't say promote your agenda no matter the questions and then complain that your own personal views on whatever were not answered. As is frequently pointed out to you and RW's - you set up a bar that the other side that you never ask of the republican candidate.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1846686774543921559

Here's a simple question for you: What makes JD Vance with less than 2 years in the Senate and with no real record of accomplishment think that he is better qualified for president than Harris?

 

[Terrylipstick]

How long was Barack Obama in the senate before he was touted as the best candidate for president?

 

[Bn2f]

And I’d be with you if the drooling fool would have resigned. Otherwise… the people have the right to the primary to choose their representative. What we saw the Democratic Party do in July-August was something out of North Korea.

You're wrong. The PB has been over this a million times. This basically comes down to you not understanding how American political parties work.

If she’d primaried against Biden and any other democrat contenders she’d have gotten her ass kicked…. Again

This is subjective. If you watched any of the 2019 Democratic debates, Harris came the closest to ending the Biden campaign. Also and again, there was a process for others to announce their candidacy - I have nothing for your failure to see and you have every right to disagree with it, but the fact remains, no one challenged Harris.

Now, explain to me how a candidate can win the GOP nomination without allowing the other candidates to question his 4 years of failed policies in the republican primaries?

 

[DeluxAuto]

How long was Barack Obama in the senate before he was touted as the best candidate for president?

How long was DonOld trump in the senate before he was touted as the best candidate for president?

 

[DeluxAuto]

The difference between DonOld and Jim Jones is that DonOld charges you for the Kool-Aid.

 

[adrina]

The point of an interview is to PROMOTE YOUR AGENDA. It doesn't matter what the questions are, your job as a candidate is to promote the agenda and get the word out why you are the better candidate for the office.

Instead of doing that, Kamala bashed Trump incessantly and filibustered everything else. What is her plan to fix immigration? How is she going to reduce inflation? What is she going to do about our National Security? Israel/Iran? Ukraine? Putin? Taiwan?

Bashing Trump is all well and good out on the campaign when you're talking to your supporters and need a rousing cheer, but when you're on national TV trying to convince people that you've got a plan, people need more than "it's all Trump's fault." Especially when Trump hasn't been in office for more than 3 years and you have.

And THAT is where Kamala failed to deliver. Like usual.

Again the irony another Trumper criticizing Kamala for doing exactly what Trump is doing but still voting for Trump.

Just par for the course with you emotional trumpers, no objectivity.

 

[Politruk]

ret Baier lied, and Kamala Harris forcefully responds.