JMohegan
.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 8,226
With regard to that first part, I honestly don't know. Over the years, I've popped into many BDSM clubs in which a whole hell of a lot of exhibitionists and voyeurs seemed to be having a rollicking good time.Netzach said:PS: is it just my observation or is the RL BDSM community largely populated by people decrying how narrow minded the RL BDSM community is, and how they're not really fitting into it?
Me included, definitely.
Sometimes I think we are cats not herded. You have Dominants who don't want to do anything without feeling like it was their decision and subs dying to prove they don't do things JUST because someone other than their personal whomever told them to, and you wind up with a lot of contrarian tendencies and fetishizing of individuality.
I've also been exposed to groups that take their culture *very* seriously, and consider the rules & norms themselves to be a key part of personal identity. People who would consider the second word in "Master Darling" to be grossly disrespectful to the majesty of the first, or be outraged by the fact that CM would be calling him Master at all, when the relationship is measured in weeks rather than months or years.
And then there are those who gather for events that seem (to me) to be sort of elaborate forms of group roleplay. Fetish attire required, Sir & Ma'am not optional, etc.
There are a lot of people out there who seem to thrive on these types of organized BDSM group dynamics. True, some display a sense of alienation when you speak to them privately. But I think it would be presumptuous to make that assumption for the majority of the group overall.
With regard to the idea of people like us as cats not herded, my question is: Why herd the cats? My observation is that organized groups are always political and petty - no matter what interest or activity forms the basis thereof.

