Etoile
Mod, 2003-2015
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2000
- Posts
- 17,049
For what it's worth, there are a LOT of women who think womyn-born-womyn policies are total bullshit. You will never catch me at Michigan, because of their exclusionary policies. That's the biggest profile event that is "for womyn-born-womyn" only, what others have you heard of?Mirror_tan said:I might be taking it too seriously, but there is a significant anti-transperson movement out there that does need to be accounted for. Advocates of "Womyn-born-womyn" policies, which excludes transgendered MtF,
Okay, Janice Raymond is a crackpot. I won't argue with you there. Not to defend her, but she was writing from a separatist perspective in 1979. Most of the modern feminists I know are also trans-positive. Raymond's views have been pretty well left behind. Yes, she has held positions of authority, but lots of people in high positions have dumb ideas. Take a look at this page that clarifies Raymond's position - which is, takes it out of the snobby tone and puts it in plain text, making it obviously idiotic. BTW, she's also against in-vitro fertilization for infertile women, and RU486 the "abortion" pill. I like Nancy Nangeroni's article skewering the Empire book.Mirror_tan said:Janice Raymond's "The Transsexual Empire", a book that levels the accusation that,
"All transsexuals rape women's bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves .... Transsexuals merely cut off the most obvious means of invading women, so that they seem non-invasive. (Raymond, 1979: 104)"
I wouldn't hold up Janice Raymond as an example of how a broad group dislikes transpeople. I would say she represents less than 10% of self-described feminists. She's cuckoo, and most people know it.
Why do they find it offensive? The MTF person is saying "I am not a man," not "I am a type of man." I don't understand why they would find it offensive. Although I do sort of understand the reason for wanting to take the T out of the equation - when you think about it, what similarities are there between gay needs and trans needs? We each have our own set of goals, that are not necessarily shared. I happen to feel that transgender rights are equally important as gay rights, and I think it's safe for us to be united in our goals - but I can see the perspective of those who disagree. (As for bisexuals, I think that's just about being angry at bisexuals for having the ability to fall in love with somebody "safe" to be partnered with. Which is not to say that bisexuals do take "the easy way out" - they end up with who they end up with - but the anger stems from the fact that the "easy way out" is there.)Mirror_tan said:When presented with a "man in a dress", some gay men do find it offensive. This is part of the reason why some want to remove the T from GLTB. (Some also want to remove the B, but that's a different story.) Depending on where you live it differs. In small towns and such where there is a need for solidarity to gain equality, you don't find this. However in a big more liberal city where there is a general undercurrent of acceptance, there is often more in-fighting.
I definitely agree with you about bigger cities being more likely to have differences between groups. But there's also more opportunities to find those who do think as you do.


