Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
ecstaticsub said:Back on topic, I have a question. Would you all consider it bottoming if your PYL ordered you to be with someone else? (whether that person considered themselves to be a Top, Dom or vanilla or whatever?) And by "being with" I mean some sort of pain play with or without sex?
My own view on this is that I was not "bottoming". I was still submitting to my Dom, the other person just being a different instrutment in his arsenal like a whip, cane or belt. Though I don't want to really objectify the person--I enjoyed talking to them and getting to know them as a person over the course of the evening also.
I would say you're both bottoming to that person, you're *letting them do something physically to you* AND you are submitting to your Dominant. You aren't submitting to the person doing the stuff to you. Bottoming to them doesn't mean anything other than you're letting them spank poke fuck or tease you, it doesn't imply anything about the nature of that rel. You could be married to them. You could never know their real first name or even a fake one.