Do women love big cocks more?

[Soccerfanpen21]

I am loving the term "usable length".

Usable length sounds clinical but fits the reasoning.

 

[rthnck]

I would say there are 2 main reasons, which are usable/insertable length and also consistency.

If you're measuring on the bottom, you are measuring a certain amount of non-usable length when it comes to sex.

Also, measuring on the top you have a consistent starting point in the pubic bone. Measuring on the bottom, you can get farther back as there is a part of the penis extending inside the body and you don't have the pubic bone to provide a consistent starting point.

Also, most scientific studies used bone pressed measurement as the standard for length (i.e.) on the top, pressed to the pubic bone.

I'm always taken out of a story on this site when a 10-12 inch cock is buried balls deep in the woman's pussy. With the right positions, anal and oral are pretty much able to accomodate a foot or more of cock/dildo. Even in the best positions, the women I have had the pleasure of fucking bottom out with about 7 inches. I've used an 8-10 inch dildo and there's no where else to go after 7 or so inches. I fully agree that girth is the main driver of big cock pleasure. So my experiences seem to indicate that 7 inches and thick is primo usable/insertable length. I'd be interested to hear about women that can take more than that "balls deep"

 

[LizVegas79]

Mine is fairly large and have received compliments. When discussing it with past girlfriends there really is a limit in how big/thick they can taken and are diminishing returns if a guy is too small. The bigger factor is in how you use it.

Oh really? When then, hi there

 

[Bbl87]

I think there are plenty of women that can take quite a bit more than average length-wise, anatomically speaking. It also depends on the amount of vaginal tenting which can vary depending on level of arousal and other variables. Heck, I'm only 6.25" length and I have accidentally contacted cervix when hers was sitting particularly low because of where she was in her menstrual cycle. But other times I don't come close. Watch enough porn and there are women who can take the whole length of very long dicks, but I imagine that is atypical. I wouldn't know personally though, girth is where I "excel", not length.

And ya, I also tend to check out with ridiculous lengths. Lengths of 10" are exceedingly rare statistically speaking, such that the number of women claiming to have seen/experienced one and the men claiming to possess them is extremely unlikely and more likely a case of male exaggeration or incorrect estimation. Beyond 10", I generally do not believe the claims. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence as they say. I'm not saying 10" is a hard limit, larger is possible, but so exceedingly unlikely as to be practically non-existent.

 

[Bbl87]

Usable length sounds clinical but fits the reasoning.

Kinda my though process.

I admittedly probably talk about it too clinically sometimes. It's something I find interesting from an academic perspective. I didn't realize where I stood size-wise until about a year ago, and since learning that I just find it fascinating. Especially considering the misconceptions and skewed perceptions on the matter.

 

[zoso682001]

I would say there are 2 main reasons, which are usable/insertable length and also consistency.

If you're measuring on the bottom, you are measuring a certain amount of non-usable length when it comes to sex.

Also, measuring on the top you have a consistent starting point in the pubic bone. Measuring on the bottom, you can get farther back as there is a part of the penis extending inside the body and you don't have the pubic bone to provide a consistent starting point.

Also, most scientific studies used bone pressed measurement as the standard for length (i.e.) on the top, pressed to the pubic bone.

This method matches everything I've ever read on the subject .

 

[Islander55]

You reference an important consideration that is often overlooked when it comes to women having extra-marital sexual relations. When we talk about other factors, I think people often assume that we mean other sexual factors. But I go on real dates that aren't just all about sex. From the guy's point of view I am sure it helps that he knows I put out. But I want a personal connection. Even if I do get together with a guy just for sex it will usually be someone with whom I already have that personal connection.

Especially with a newer lover, it is important to establish some type of connection and let things progress slowly and naturally. With someone you already know well, you can move right into one is in the mood but still most of the time it is good to have something in common that you can both enjoy before the sex.

 

[Purple_Fronds]

This seems to be an ongoing topic on Lit so I will toss in my thoughts as an older woman. I have never been with a man with a very small cock but I find that average ones work perfectly well as long as they have a good erection. That said I have enjoyed a few larger ones. Perhaps 9" being the largest. They can be fun but for me it may be more about proving that I can take a bigger one. I am not sure the sex is better but it is different and I do enjoy variety. One does have to be a bit more careful with the bigger ones and make sure you are ready for it. I will also agree with many of the women on here that girth is more important than length. It just seems to make better contact with my clit. I will add that I have seldom measured a man so it is just my perception of how it feels.

Women are just as competitive as men and the refrain from women in terms of proving they can take it is one I’ve heard a lot. There’s definitely some gauntlets being thrown down, I have one friend who was very pleased with herself when she was able to take a porn star’s big cock in her ass.

 

[Bbl87]

Women are just as competitive as men and the refrain from women in terms of proving they can take it is one I’ve heard a lot. There’s definitely some gauntlets being thrown down, I have one friend who was very pleased with herself when she was able to take a porn star’s big cock in her ass.

That has been the one downside to my size. My wife is a HARD pass on anal.

 

[policywank]

I think that one of the errors we make when referencing statistics on this topic is to ignore identifiable differences in data sets. Saying that the average cock size is 5.25" is a bit like saying the average height of a male is 5'9". Those observations are accurate when applied to the weighted average of all human males, but that doesn't mean it applies equally to all data sets.

The observed data varies a lot by region which is heavily correlated to ethnicity (most countries outside of North America and Western Europe are largely ethnically homogenous). We know that the average Scandinavian is taller than the average Chinese man. The cock size data by region shows the same patterns. South east asian men are smaller than the average. Meanwhile, there are regions in Africa and Slavic nations where the average cock size is 7".

The data also reflects all men in a given population - young/old, big/small, etc. - not just the ones that tend to stand out or that we find attractive. Generally speaking the physical characteristics that make men more noticeable and/or that women find attractive tend to be correlated to larger cock size.

I think that the data indicates that about 3% of all men have a cock that is 8" or more and 10" or more is 1% or less. But surely we all understand that a woman dating NBA players is dealing with a very different data set. Of course that is the extreme example. But even for the average North American woman the percentages are modestly higher and if she is attractive enough to draw the "cream of the crop" so to speak the percentages are bumped up further.

A woman dating tall, broad shouldered, athletic caucasian and black men is not encountering a data set that averages 5.25". In my dating pool 8" cocks are not the norm or the average, but they aren't uncommon either (yes I have measured). Cocks that are 10" or larger are still very rare, but not as rare as hen's teeth and unicorns.

 

[Islander55]

Women are just as competitive as men and the refrain from women in terms of proving they can take it is one I’ve heard a lot. There’s definitely some gauntlets being thrown down, I have one friend who was very pleased with herself when she was able to take a porn star’s big cock in her ass.

I think many women enjoy taking a big cock. Maybe something they would not want all the time but just knowing you can is arousing.

 

[jenni_bean]

Here's my two cents. All cocks are nice, but big ones, particularly when they're thick, are really nice!

 

[Lady2020]

Depends on the guy.

 

[PMarky2]

I'm rather amused by the fact my cock in all its glory is slightly more than 10% of my height.

 

[Purple_Fronds]

That has been the one downside to my size. My wife is a HARD pass on anal.

The hardships you have to endure.

 

[Bbl87]

The hardships you have to endure.

Every rose has its thorns.

 

[BongoGal]

We know that the average Scandinavian is taller than the average Chinese man. The cock size data by region shows the same patterns. South east asian men are smaller than the average. Meanwhile, there are regions in Africa and Slavic nations where the average cock size is 7".

That all sounds perfectly true to me, but I do have nagging doubts about 'cock size data'. Are there studies around the world that have significant numbers of local guys going to a lab-style setting, dropping their pants, getting hard, and then getting measured in the same way as all the other studies? It seems...unlikely to me. Are ads put in local media that ask for volunteers? That would make things warped by the mere fact that there is self-selection among those being measured. And how many guys take them up on the offer? Are ten guys even vaguely close enough to seem like a good sample? Does one hundred make a better sample? Of course, but that seems like a whole lot of guys to get hard in front of strangers. Plenty of cultures would consider it taboo for lady scientists to see and measure them, so in those places, it would be an all-dudes project? (I read something years ago about a Japanese study that estimated average size by pulling on the cocks of cadavers, measuring them, and then using that as data. That struck me as far too flawed to give a second thought to.)

 

[policywank]

That all sounds perfectly true to me, but I do have nagging doubts about 'cock size data'. Are there studies around the world that have significant numbers of local guys going to a lab-style setting, dropping their pants, getting hard, and then getting measured in the same way as all the other studies? It seems...unlikely to me. Are ads put in local media that ask for volunteers? That would make things warped by the mere fact that there is self-selection among those being measured. And how many guys take them up on the offer? Are ten guys even vaguely close enough to seem like a good sample? Does one hundred make a better sample? Of course, but that seems like a whole lot of guys to get hard in front of strangers. Plenty of cultures would consider it taboo for lady scientists to see and measure them, so in those places, it would be an all-dudes project? (I read something years ago about a Japanese study that estimated average size by pulling on the cocks of cadavers, measuring them, and then using that as data. That struck me as far too flawed to give a second thought to.)

Lol, also reminds me of the guys who draw conclusions from their own locker room experiences - unless guys walk around the locker room with full hard-ons, in which case I might need to look into that.

I can certainly see that there would be some challenges to getting a representative sample. It also wouldn't surprise me to find that there is confirmation bias involved given just how committed some people are to reinforcing their preferred narrative.

 

[haventdonethat]

That all sounds perfectly true to me, but I do have nagging doubts about 'cock size data'. Are there studies around the world that have significant numbers of local guys going to a lab-style setting, dropping their pants, getting hard, and then getting measured in the same way as all the other studies? It seems...unlikely to me. Are ads put in local media that ask for volunteers? That would make things warped by the mere fact that there is self-selection among those being measured. And how many guys take them up on the offer? Are ten guys even vaguely close enough to seem like a good sample? Does one hundred make a better sample? Of course, but that seems like a whole lot of guys to get hard in front of strangers. Plenty of cultures would consider it taboo for lady scientists to see and measure them, so in those places, it would be an all-dudes project? (I read something years ago about a Japanese study that estimated average size by pulling on the cocks of cadavers, measuring them, and then using that as data. That struck me as far too flawed to give a second thought to.)

Cant remember where I read it so no scientific data to share.
What I remember more than the data on size is how they were measured. From what I remember . .
The naked guys approached a steel barrier with a vertical slot in it and positioned themselves with pubic bone against the barrier with cock protruding through. Either they or a technician (cant remember) would pull their soft cock to its comfortable limit with two hands, fingers on the glans, and measure. Erections were not required.
I think the study was at a university and the guys were given a couple dollars stipend.

 

[BongoGal]

I can certainly see that there would be some challenges to getting a representative sample. It also wouldn't surprise me to find that there is confirmation bias involved given just how committed some people are to reinforcing their preferred narrative.

Some of the labs would be perfectly objective and scientifically minded, but others might be tempted to give a boost to the local population. I can imagine some dude in a lab adding a .5" to the true estimated average. "There is a fleeting chance that I might get laid if some woman assumes because of this data that my Argentinian cock is a bit larger than the Venezuelans she's used to."

Erections were not required.

Um, I have to think that erections are required to get an idea about how big the erections are. Maybe I am off base here, but I feel reasonably confident in saying that two guys with gently tugged and measured flaccid cocks may end up with significant differences when both become erect.

 

[haventdonethat]

Some of the labs would be perfectly objective and scientifically minded, but others might be tempted to give a boost to the local population. I can imagine some dude in a lab adding a .5" to the true estimated average. "There is a fleeting chance that I might get laid if some woman assumes because of this data that my Argentinian cock is a bit larger than the Venezuelans she's used to."

Um, I have to think that erections are required to get an idea about how big the erections are. Maybe I am off base here, but I feel reasonably confident in saying that two guys with gently tugged and measured flaccid cocks may end up with significant differences when both become erect.

Like I mentioned, I do not have the study or data so am only going by an old memory of what I read. Is my memory accurate? Dunno.

 

[BongoGal]

Like I mentioned, I do not have the study or data so am only going by an old memory of what I read. Is my memory accurate? Dunno.

Oh, I know, and I assume your memory is accurate. I just don't see how much info could be gleaned from flaccid measurements. I'm sure it would be of some interest, but I think everyone would be asking, "Um, that's nice to know, but what about when it's a boner?"

 

[lc69hunter]

Can women explain to me, is bigger generally better? What's the minimum size you need to be satisfied?
I am asking because since we started swinging my wife doesn't have sex with me (5 in) anymore, and the men she chooses always seem to be at least twice my size.

1. You are dreaming. A 10 inch cock is a statistical outlier. Very few in existence, and probably get very little action.
2. This is from two of my wives and several girlfriends over the years (I know that is not a valid sample size). Their opinion is that a large cock is like a decadent dessert. Delicious, but you wouldn't want a steady diet of it. Why, you ask? Think about it. If a woman is not used to it, and does it twice that night, her pussy is sore for the next couple of days, and if she deep throats him, she has a sore throat the next day. Yeah, she loved it at the time and will do it again, but for everyday use, an average size cock and a man who knows how to use it is the winner. He has a cock that will comfortably fit in all three holes, and bring her to multiple orgasms on a regular basis.

Don't envy Mr big cock. Yes he will get a lot of strange pussy, maybe including your wife or girlfriend upon occasion, but he is not threat to you. He is just a dessert.

These are my thoughts.

 

[haventdonethat]

Oh, I know, and I assume your memory is accurate. I just don't see how much info could be gleaned from flaccid measurements. I'm sure it would be of some interest, but I think everyone would be asking, "Um, that's nice to know, but what about when it's a boner?"

I defer to you.
Just did a quick google on penis measurement and it corroborates that erect is the scientific method.
Should have done that from the get go LOL!

 

[nightowl75]

That all sounds perfectly true to me, but I do have nagging doubts about 'cock size data'. Are there studies around the world that have significant numbers of local guys going to a lab-style setting, dropping their pants, getting hard, and then getting measured in the same way as all the other studies? It seems...unlikely to me. Are ads put in local media that ask for volunteers? That would make things warped by the mere fact that there is self-selection among those being measured. And how many guys take them up on the offer? Are ten guys even vaguely close enough to seem like a good sample? Does one hundred make a better sample? Of course, but that seems like a whole lot of guys to get hard in front of strangers. Plenty of cultures would consider it taboo for lady scientists to see and measure them, so in those places, it would be an all-dudes project? (I read something years ago about a Japanese study that estimated average size by pulling on the cocks of cadavers, measuring them, and then using that as data. That struck me as far too flawed to give a second thought to.)

I have never seen any ads for a study like this. Surely the volunteer lines would be long. (I’ll see myself out.)