Do women love big cocks more?

I have never seen any ads for a study like this. Surely the volunteer lines would be long. (I’ll see myself out.)
Would guys line up for such a study if there is no happy ending involved in the lab? "Okay, you are fully hard, and we have measured you. Sorry to leave you hanging, but we need you to pull your pants up and go home. Here is $20."
 
I think most of us would. At least there would be no worries about trying to avoid getting hard. I had a physical years ago for my current job, and the lady doctor had me drop my pants and cough.
 
I think there are flaws in the studies.
My reasoning is just the condom size are so small and until very recently not available in multiple sizes.
I think the studies were of the men in the academic setting who volunteered for the study. Not the general population.

I sat through all the sex ed lectures that condoms would fit every guy and ...
I heard the girls give all the reasons why their men won't use one and repeated back what I was taught in college and med school.
Then I got married and had to search for larger ones.
Now I'm dating a beast and fuck they aren't sold large enough in stores. I went to the sex shop in the black neighborhood and asked for the largest size. The poor beast still had a ring where it was too tight.


And as far as women wanting size. This beast never showed me he cock till after we were chatting quite a bit , even though I asked.
He didn't want to scare me off by it's size.
 
And as far as women wanting size. This beast never showed me he cock till after we were chatting quite a bit , even though I asked.
He didn't want to scare me off by it's size.
That sounds like a good 'strategy' on his part. Leading with his beastliness would be gauche at best. You were up for the challenge, but I have to imagine that some women might chat with him 'quite a bit' and still end up saying 'no way!' when they see it.
 
I think there are flaws in the studies.
My reasoning is just the condom size are so small and until very recently not available in multiple sizes.
I think the studies were of the men in the academic setting who volunteered for the study. Not the general population.

I sat through all the sex ed lectures that condoms would fit every guy and ...
I heard the girls give all the reasons why their men won't use one and repeated back what I was taught in college and med school.
Then I got married and had to search for larger ones.
Now I'm dating a beast and fuck they aren't sold large enough in stores. I went to the sex shop in the black neighborhood and asked for the largest size. The poor beast still had a ring where it was too tight.


And as far as women wanting size. This beast never showed me he cock till after we were chatting quite a bit , even though I asked.
He didn't want to scare me off by it's size.
I can count on my fingers the number of times Hubby and I have used a condom since we've been together. We both hate them. I don't like the taste, feel, disruption to the flow, etc... he does not like the fit. Regular size is too tight and large is too long. But the last time we used one, he found wide ones that he said fit much better. I still don't like them, so he hasn't used one in years... But we know what to get of we have to again someday.
 
Oh, I know, and I assume your memory is accurate. I just don't see how much info could be gleaned from flaccid measurements. I'm sure it would be of some interest, but I think everyone would be asking, "Um, that's nice to know, but what about when it's a boner?"

We have all heard of growers versus showers right? I have certainly observed substantial differences in the ratio/relationship between guys' flaccid versus hard dicks. The only way to know how big it is erect if to get it hard.
 
We have all heard of growers versus showers right? I have certainly observed substantial differences in the ratio/relationship between guys' flaccid versus hard dicks. The only way to know how big it is erect if to get it hard.
I've heard of showers, but if that means they don't grow much, then I have never 'met' one. In my experience, long when flaccid means longer when hard.
 
I've heard of showers, but if that means they don't grow much, then I have never 'met' one. In my experience, long when flaccid means longer when hard.
I have definitely seen some that grow more when they get hard than others do.
 
So, I've recently had a little affair with an eighteen-year-old man who's a neighbor of mine. His cock is longer than Hubby's but not nearly as thick. I have no complaints about sex with him, but he doesn't stretch me like Hubby. And I like being stretched like that. 😈
You love me then 😂
 
That all sounds perfectly true to me, but I do have nagging doubts about 'cock size data'. Are there studies around the world that have significant numbers of local guys going to a lab-style setting, dropping their pants, getting hard, and then getting measured in the same way as all the other studies? It seems...unlikely to me. Are ads put in local media that ask for volunteers? That would make things warped by the mere fact that there is self-selection among those being measured. And how many guys take them up on the offer? Are ten guys even vaguely close enough to seem like a good sample? Does one hundred make a better sample? Of course, but that seems like a whole lot of guys to get hard in front of strangers. Plenty of cultures would consider it taboo for lady scientists to see and measure them, so in those places, it would be an all-dudes project? (I read something years ago about a Japanese study that estimated average size by pulling on the cocks of cadavers, measuring them, and then using that as data. That struck me as far too flawed to give a second thought to.)
YOu and Policy Wank need to get working on that study.
Im sure that, if you start with Lit, you will find lots of men willing to drop trousers and let you measure.
As to whether you have to help them to reach full length, well, science does require sacrifice.

I read further, and I see you are planning to leave us hanging.
Or, sticking out, as it were.
I think it would still leave me with a workable memory.
 
I can count on my fingers the number of times Hubby and I have used a condom since we've been together. We both hate them. I don't like the taste, feel, disruption to the flow, etc... he does not like the fit. Regular size is too tight and large is too long. But the last time we used one, he found wide ones that he said fit much better. I still don't like them, so he hasn't used one in years... But we know what to get of we have to again someday.
I can't use them myself.
 
That all sounds perfectly true to me, but I do have nagging doubts about 'cock size data'. Are there studies around the world that have significant numbers of local guys going to a lab-style setting, dropping their pants, getting hard, and then getting measured in the same way as all the other studies? It seems...unlikely to me. Are ads put in local media that ask for volunteers? That would make things warped by the mere fact that there is self-selection among those being measured. And how many guys take them up on the offer? Are ten guys even vaguely close enough to seem like a good sample? Does one hundred make a better sample? Of course, but that seems like a whole lot of guys to get hard in front of strangers. Plenty of cultures would consider it taboo for lady scientists to see and measure them, so in those places, it would be an all-dudes project? (I read something years ago about a Japanese study that estimated average size by pulling on the cocks of cadavers, measuring them, and then using that as data. That struck me as far too flawed to give a second thought to.)

To my knowledge, I don't think there has been an actual scientific study regarding nation of residence/ethnicity/etc.. There's a graphic that makes the rounds from time to time about different average sizes in different countries, I think it says El Salvador was the largest at like 7" average, followed by several African countries. But if you dig into it at all, there's actually no real research behind it, it's all based ok self reported measurements if that.

And ya, selection bias could definitely play a big role. That's one reason the average may actually even be a tad lower than the generally accepted 5.5" length and 4.6" girth. But it's hard to tell.

I don't take it as gospel, but the best resource I've found is CalcSD.

https://calcsd.info/full

They at least explain their datasets, how measurements were taken in those studies, etc.. It's more of a novelty than anything, but it's probably the best "metastudy" of the data out there we have at the moment.
 
From what I've gathered over lo these many years, some guys feel as if they last longer when wearing a condom.
I definitely do. To the point I actually usually have difficulty orgasming, haha. I'm sure if I used them more I'd get used to it though. But they caused problems in that short time we used them again because we both hated the feeling.
 
I think that one of the errors we make when referencing statistics on this topic is to ignore identifiable differences in data sets. Saying that the average cock size is 5.25" is a bit like saying the average height of a male is 5'9". Those observations are accurate when applied to the weighted average of all human males, but that doesn't mean it applies equally to all data sets.

The observed data varies a lot by region which is heavily correlated to ethnicity (most countries outside of North America and Western Europe are largely ethnically homogenous). We know that the average Scandinavian is taller than the average Chinese man. The cock size data by region shows the same patterns. South east asian men are smaller than the average. Meanwhile, there are regions in Africa and Slavic nations where the average cock size is 7".

The data also reflects all men in a given population - young/old, big/small, etc. - not just the ones that tend to stand out or that we find attractive. Generally speaking the physical characteristics that make men more noticeable and/or that women find attractive tend to be correlated to larger cock size.

I think that the data indicates that about 3% of all men have a cock that is 8" or more and 10" or more is 1% or less. But surely we all understand that a woman dating NBA players is dealing with a very different data set. Of course that is the extreme example. But even for the average North American woman the percentages are modestly higher and if she is attractive enough to draw the "cream of the crop" so to speak the percentages are bumped up further.

A woman dating tall, broad shouldered, athletic caucasian and black men is not encountering a data set that averages 5.25". In my dating pool 8" cocks are not the norm or the average, but they aren't uncommon either (yes I have measured). Cocks that are 10" or larger are still very rare, but not as rare as hen's teeth and unicorns.
I love it when you talk stats
 
From what I've gathered over lo these many years, some guys feel as if they last longer when wearing a condom.

I guess it all depends on a variety of factors. I for one love condoms. I use the "skin" (thin) versions that are large size which are simply more comfortable for me. I love not thinking about pulling out or having an accident (unless the condom breaks which is rare). And I'd rather take responsibility for safety then leave it in a partner's hands. To me there's not much difference in sensation.
 
Some would say I am blessed to married to a man who has an 8" cock. I say that it is not because of his size in and of itself, but because he knows "how" to use what he has and is extremely good orally as well. I have also been with men smaller endowed who were likewise very talented and knew how to please a woman sexually. I can't speak for all women but I am pretty uncomfortable with a man endowed much over 8", especially if he is like a wild bull in a field with no comprehension of what he is doing. One word OWWW! And there is no use in sex if there is no pleasure in it, I don't care how big he is. I have actually refused and even pissed off several who were 10" plus who assumed I was going to bend over and give it up because of their large size. I don't care if the guy could make a mint in porn, that is NOT going in me, especially if he is an arrogant asshole about it. For me, my preference range is about 5" to 8", and that is normally the size range I think most women prefer, or at least the ones I know. That is not to say there aren't women who prefer the super endowed. I have know a few like that as well, but very few. Having been in the swinging lifestyle for years I would judge the average size is around 51/2 to inches give or take. There is also a misconception about black men. My observation has been the same average range holds true there. We have been to swinger events where the black male literally had the smallest cock in the room.
 
Can women explain to me, is bigger generally better? What's the minimum size you need to be satisfied?
I am asking because since we started swinging my wife doesn't have sex with me (5 in) anymore, and the men she chooses always seem to be at least twice my size.
I dont think so. I checked with my wife and she says she is happier with my medium size cock and fully satisfied.No need for any big or bulky cock.
 
YOu and Policy Wank need to get working on that study.
Im sure that, if you start with Lit, you will find lots of men willing to drop trousers and let you measure.
As to whether you have to help them to reach full length, well, science does require sacrifice.

I read further, and I see you are planning to leave us hanging.
Or, sticking out, as it were.
I think it would still leave me with a workable memory.

Perhaps if we promised a happy ending that might make it easier to gather an appropriate control group that will optimize the efficacy of the data.
 
As others have noted an XL cock can have its drawbacks. However, I have never had any problem managing them. If the guy is an arrogant asshole who doesn't listen he is not going to get to first base anyway. If we do end up getting naked and I find out that he is "packing" I have no problem giving him specific direction on what to do or not do.

Being a promiscuous woman (by most people's standards anyway) I have found it important to be able to manage all aspects of a sexual interaction as required. If a guy is pounding away and it is hurting me I will stop him immediately by any means necessary. Obviously it isn't impossible for a man to overpower me so I need to be sure he isn't that type of guy before we get naked.

Obviously there are limits. I don't want to fuck a fence post. But I don't really get the notion of not enjoying a big cock that would be pleasurable if the guy is a good lover but might be uncomfortable if he is not. It is a bit like not trying that new Indian place because the food might be too hot for me. It isn't like they are going to force feed me against my will. If it isn't to my liking I have the means to make appropriate adjustments, including leave if necessary.
 
As others have noted an XL cock can have its drawbacks. However, I have never had any problem managing them. If the guy is an arrogant asshole who doesn't listen he is not going to get to first base anyway. If we do end up getting naked and I find out that he is "packing" I have no problem giving him specific direction on what to do or not do.

Being a promiscuous woman (by most people's standards anyway) I have found it important to be able to manage all aspects of a sexual interaction as required. If a guy is pounding away and it is hurting me I will stop him immediately by any means necessary. Obviously it isn't impossible for a man to overpower me so I need to be sure he isn't that type of guy before we get naked.

Obviously there are limits. I don't want to fuck a fence post. But I don't really get the notion of not enjoying a big cock that would be pleasurable if the guy is a good lover but might be uncomfortable if he is not. It is a bit like not trying that new Indian place because the food might be too hot for me. It isn't like they are going to force feed me against my will. If it isn't to my liking I have the means to make appropriate adjustments, including leave if necessary.
While there are great "posters" on LIT, and i enjoy reading most all of them, You have the most thoughtful replies in these forums. Well-articulated perspectives, open-minded responses, and some of the best metaphors, which really highlight your points. Thank You!! i'm sure many others concur, so i'll wait for the "likes"..... : )
 
While there are great "posters" on LIT, and i enjoy reading most all of them, You have the most thoughtful replies in these forums. Well-articulated perspectives, open-minded responses, and some of the best metaphors, which really highlight your points. Thank You!! i'm sure many others concur, so i'll wait for the "likes"..... : )
Agreed. I even have one bookmarked because I was like damn, that's really well put...
 
Perhaps if we promised a happy ending that might make it easier to gather an appropriate control group that will optimize the efficacy of the data.
Bongo Girl seems to feel that this would compromise the scientific integrity of the study.
She was willing to offer $20 to each subject, so its not that she is unwilling to compensate the subjects. So, it is all really a question of the value of the compensation to be provided.
On the one hand, a happy ending from you would be much more valuable than a $20 bill.
On the other hand, an essential part of the study would be ensuring that the study subjects had reached maximum length, which would require hands-on research.
 
Back
Top