Do women love big cocks more?

The same goes for guys 3 identical women standing naked side by side I bet the biggest boobs are picked
Nah, kinda different as boobs are strictly visual.
I'd choose tightest pussy but impossible to know.
So usually shorter women have smaller vaginas, so I'd take shortest over boobs.
 
Nah, kinda different as boobs are strictly visual.
I'd choose tightest pussy but impossible to know.
So usually shorter women have smaller vaginas, so I'd take shortest over boobs.
But it's a preference deal... subjective... just like cock size. And if you think boobs are "strictly visual," you're doing boobs wrong. Trust me. I have them and I love other women's boobs, and visual is just one aspect... For example, I love the heft of a larger breast when I lift it to kiss and lick and suck the nipple... 😈😈😈
 
Nah, kinda different as boobs are strictly visual.
I'd choose tightest pussy but impossible to know.
So usually shorter women have smaller vaginas, so I'd take shortest over boobs.
Dear you can see my breasts but I don’t enjoy them much unless they’re played with , they are more than just visual adds for new boyfriends lol
 
Agreed. It is much more than a matter of them simply being bigger men. Overall proportions are not a particularly good indicator of penis size in my observation. People used to say big feet meant you had a big dick, which is mostly bullshit in my experience.

But in my observation it also isn't a matter of any group of men matching the statistical average of the population. I can't tell you which aspects of their physiology matter in a statistical sense, but I can tell you with certainty that a room full of NBA players do not average out to a room full of 5.5" cocks, nor do they average out to the same cock size as a room full of Korean mathematicians.

The whole matter of what is the statistical average and how likely is a woman to find a statistically unlikely cock size seems heavily geared to managing the male ego. I like larger dicks and while I have observed some trends they are far from statistically significant. I certainly can't provide a regression analysis with a high degree of predictive efficacy.

But I don't go around playing the odds like every date is a toss of the dice. To the extent that size matters to me I seek the characteristics that seem to be modestly co-related with larger men and when I find those that suit me I return to them.

I don't know anyone who seeks average in much of anything we seek. A man doesn't need to have a penis that matches up with an average woman's vagina or vice versa. We all have our preferences which in turn aren't purely a function of our physiology. Some women like big dicks and our statistical probability of finding them by pulling a name out of a hat as if there are no other factors in dating is of limited relevance.
I do at times question the height correlation statistics.
My wife used to date only very tall guys, a few 6'4" plus, and the sizes she says she experienced seems statistically improbable.

She is also blessed with a REALLY big bottom for her shape. I think that could be another factor as guys that hit on her likely have a level of confidence to handle her physical attributes.

Many of her past lovers she attests were 9"+ and very few under 7.
Most were black, but that statistically shouldn't make a difference.

I think the bigger guys were drawn to her, first cause she is sexy as hell, also cause they correctly predicted she could handle their size.
Seems mostly size doesn't matter if it can provide adequate pleasure, but every women's definition of that would be unique to them.
 
I do at times question the height correlation statistics.
My wife used to date only very tall guys, a few 6'4" plus, and the sizes she says she experienced seems statistically improbable.

She is also blessed with a REALLY big bottom for her shape. I think that could be another factor as guys that hit on her likely have a level of confidence to handle her physical attributes.

Many of her past lovers she attests were 9"+ and very few under 7.
Most were black, but that statistically shouldn't make a difference.

I think the bigger guys were drawn to her, first cause she is sexy as hell, also cause they correctly predicted she could handle their size.
Seems mostly size doesn't matter if it can provide adequate pleasure, but every women's definition of that would be unique to them.
That is so very true
 
The same goes for guys 3 identical women standing naked side by side I bet the biggest boobs are picked
Not always. Personally I prefer a shapely ass and legs. I see your point though, and that’s a draw for many, but I guess we all have different kinks.
 
But it's a preference deal... subjective... just like cock size. And if you think boobs are "strictly visual," you're doing boobs wrong. Trust me. I have them and I love other women's boobs, and visual is just one aspect... For example, I love the heft of a larger breast when I lift it to kiss and lick and suck the nipple... 😈😈😈
I love boobs but from a selfish perspective a big ass and or tight pussy are more fun for prolonged sex bouts.
A pussy provides the direct stimulation for a guy unless he's into pearl necklaces.
It's like saying muscles are pleasurable for a woman. Visually maybe, but if he has a 1 inch dick those muscles are pointless.
 
The same goes for guys 3 identical women standing naked side by side I bet the biggest boobs are picked

Not for me. I do like big tits, but if I am just looking at her physical appearance I look at the whole body. Even if I am just looking at her tits I am looking at multiple factors such as size, shape, nipple characteristics, sensitivity, etc.

The interesting thing I find about these discussions is the degree to which some people pursue the beauty is 'only skin deep' ideal almost to the point of virtue signalling. I mean, I get it. There is a lot more to a person than physical characteristics let alone one particular physical characteristic. But realistically most people do pay attention to physical characteristics and do have preferences. Pretending otherwise is just an exercise in self-delusion.

Likewise society seems to try to compel us to accept certain physical preferences while not accepting others. If I say I was attracting to my wife because of her piercing green eyes or her angelic face or her curly blond hair or even her fit physique those are all acceptable. But if I say that I like her great rack or perfectly fuckable heart shaped ass then I am a pig, lol. Women have been judging men negatively for such opinions since the beginning of time and it has never changed the way men feel one iota.
 
I do at times question the height correlation statistics.
My wife used to date only very tall guys, a few 6'4" plus, and the sizes she says she experienced seems statistically improbable.

She is also blessed with a REALLY big bottom for her shape. I think that could be another factor as guys that hit on her likely have a level of confidence to handle her physical attributes.

Many of her past lovers she attests were 9"+ and very few under 7.
Most were black, but that statistically shouldn't make a difference.

I think the bigger guys were drawn to her, first cause she is sexy as hell, also cause they correctly predicted she could handle their size.
Seems mostly size doesn't matter if it can provide adequate pleasure, but every women's definition of that would be unique to them.

I haven't noticed any one characteristic that is a good predictor of cock size. But I have noticed some that seem to have a modest correlation and which taken together appear to have some predictive capacity.

In terms of physical features I would say that all physical proportions (taller as well as broader) are only modestly correlated to cock size. Athleticism also seems to be a minor predictor to the extent that a man is involved in activities that seem to be correlated with high testosterone. Ethnicity is a minor factor as well - it certainly isn't true that all black guys have big dicks, but on average they are moderately larger. And I am curious to know if the normal distribution of black men is different than other races - anecdotally it seems like they are only modestly larger on average, but somewhat more likely to have a true outlier on the XXL end.

Also there is such a thing as "big dick energy". Some think of it in terms of the confidence a guy exudes. But I also see it in terms of the situations and women he pursues. If a guy perceives your wife as a stacked hottie who dates tall masculine looking dudes he may perceive that she has a preference for big dicks or at least that their is an increased likelihood of this being the case. He is going to be substantially more inclined to pursue her if he thinks he can measure up.

Further to this last point there are things that your wife can do (like the way she dresses or flirts) that will convey her sexual interest which guys may infer to have some sort of correlation to a preference for big dicks.

And of course women talk. Sometimes the most dependable way to find a big cock is through a referral.

I think that we generally underestimate the degree to which we group ourselves in such a way that helps well hung men and the women who prefer them to find one another. When it is all taken together the result is that the group from which I or your wife draw our sexual partners looks nothing like population wide averages.

Think of it this way. Suppose 1% of men have an 8" cock. But a hottie who attracts the most sexually desirable men (as defined by cock size for the simplicity of this point) is dating the top 10% of men. Her probability of finding an 8" cock is therefore 10%, not 1%. Now suppose she applies the various observations above to identify the larger dudes. It is far from perfect, but I bet you that she can at least double her odds to 20%. But she doesn't just roll the dice anew every time she goes out on a date does she? No, she goes back to the guys that satisfied her desire for a big dick and she talks to her friends about the guys they date and their friends, etc. Trust me, she won't have much trouble finding well hung guys.

Obviously I have taken a very simplistic approach to the statistics which can be readily critiqued, but I think that you get the point.
 
In terms of physical features I would say that all physical proportions (taller as well as broader) are only modestly correlated to cock size. Athleticism also seems to be a minor predictor to the extent that a man is involved in activities that seem to be correlated with high testosterone. Ethnicity is a minor factor as well - it certainly isn't true that all black guys have big dicks, but on average they are moderately larger.

According to my urologist (confirmed by google search), penis size has nothing to do with Androgen levels - we discussed this when discussing my wife's and my challenges w/ my huge length/ girth. And he confirmed it's only very SLIGHLTY correlated w/ body size. As mentioned on the calcSD site, for every 3" beyond average height, there is a predicted add'l 1/10" of penis length. ..So not much.

And contrary to what's depicted in porn, black men do not have larger dicks. That's a myth that originates with white men trying to make white women fearful of black men by telling dehumanizing lies about how they have terrifyingly huge penises and are hyper sexual. If this were true, wouldn't black women likely have deeper vaginas? ...Of course, you don't hear that myth being propagated.

I think it's highly likely that women simply don't properly measure - and why would they? Are they really carrying measuring tapes around with them? ...I know I'd find it weird for a women to whip out a measuring tape during sex. That is a far more likely explanation than researchers going to the trouble of gathering data on 15,000 study participants then LYING about the results just so they feel better about their own penises :)
 
Last edited:
As a man I know for a fact that most women loves and craves a big cock. They tell me that all the time
 
According to my urologist (confirmed by google search), penis size has nothing to do with Androgen levels - we discussed this when discussing my wife's and my challenges w/ my huge length/ girth. And he confirmed it's only very SLIGHLTY correlated w/ body size. As mentioned on the calcSD site, for every 3" beyond average height, there is a predicted add'l 1/10" of penis length. ..So not much.

And contrary to what's depicted in porn, black men do not have larger dicks. That's a myth that originates with white men trying to make white women fearful of black men by telling dehumanizing lies about how they have terrifyingly huge penises and are hyper sexual. If this were true, wouldn't black women likely have deeper vaginas? ...Of course, you don't hear that myth being propagated.

I think it's highly likely that women simply don't properly measure - and why would they? Are they really carrying measuring tapes around with them? ...I know I'd find it weird for a women to whip out a measuring tape during sex. That is a far more likely explanation than researchers going to the trouble of gathering data on 15,000 study participants then LYING about the results just so they feel better about their own penises :)

I have only cited the things that I have observed from purely anecdotal observation. I haven't claimed it to be scientific or statistically significant. And to the extent that I have observed correlation I have not claimed that to be causation.

Although there is quite a bit of statistical data that does note moderate differences between ethnic groups. And that is taken directly from the studies themselves with proper methodologies and no further distortion (such as the subjectivity and confirmation bias introduced by the aggregation of data by a website intent on assuaging male insecurity).

In any event, nobody needs to mansplain the use of a measuring tape to me. I am quite adept at their usage and can well tell the difference between 6" and 9". So I have made the point that assuming the dataset is accurate for the population as a whole and recognizing that I know my own experience then there must be a difference in the datasets. That stands to reason. I know of no woman whose dating pool is men randomly selected from the entire population.

All I have done is observe some of the differences between my dataset and the population as a whole in a very unscientific and anecdotal way. There may be many other things that I am missing. And the relevance of the things that I have observed may be overstated or understated. But the difference is real (and yes I have actually measured enough according to the supposed proper procedure to have actual reference points). That doesn't go away because some men want to believe that an 8" penis is rarer than unicorn semen for whatever reason.
 
I have only cited the things that I have observed from purely anecdotal observation. I haven't claimed it to be scientific or statistically significant. And to the extent that I have observed correlation I have not claimed that to be causation.

Although there is quite a bit of statistical data that does note moderate differences between ethnic groups. And that is taken directly from the studies themselves with proper methodologies and no further distortion (such as the subjectivity and confirmation bias introduced by the aggregation of data by a website intent on assuaging male insecurity).

In any event, nobody needs to mansplain the use of a measuring tape to me. I am quite adept at their usage and can well tell the difference between 6" and 9". So I have made the point that assuming the dataset is accurate for the population as a whole and recognizing that I know my own experience then there must be a difference in the datasets. That stands to reason. I know of no woman whose dating pool is men randomly selected from the entire population.

All I have done is observe some of the differences between my dataset and the population as a whole in a very unscientific and anecdotal way. There may be many other things that I am missing. And the relevance of the things that I have observed may be overstated or understated. But the difference is real (and yes I have actually measured enough according to the supposed proper procedure to have actual reference points). That doesn't go away because some men want to believe that an 8" penis is rarer than unicorn semen for whatever reason.
You are quite true to your research and reasonings. So let me make a correction. My observations and conclusions were derived from a drug induced environment.
 
Funny story on this subject. Years ago I was in NJ for my niece's bat mitzvah and I ended up being the only male in a group of fifty-ish moms. My sister-in-law was telling stories about all the stupid things her ex had done over the years. I was waiting for someone to ask why she married him but one woman said "So how big was his dick?" She held her hands about eight or nine inches apart. Not surprising since he was 6'6." Was also dumb as a stump. The guy she was dating when she passed away was only about 5'7."
 
Back
Top