Emily’s NEW positivity and being nice to each other thread

A Victorian MP, Georgie Purcell, had a photo of her altered and shown on a national TV news network. Her boobs were increased, and her dress altered to a crop top and a skirt. Channel Nine apologised and said it was an unintended result of “automation by Photoshop”.
Their excuse was bullshit!! "Automation by photoshop" doesn't remove parts of her outfit to make it more revealing, or alter her figure. Even Adobe came out and said that it wasn't automated, as you said, so I'm inclined to not believe that excuse. What a weird world.

At least we have interesting cephalopod appendage information.
 
As an aside. Interesting science-ie factoid concerning cephalopods and their appendages. I learned something new today. Woo Hoo !!!

Arms -vs- Tentacles
Thank you. I’ve corrected people for calling octopus arms tentacles, but when pressed for “what’s the difference?” I’ve always failed to deliver. Been one of those things I’ve always meant to google…
 
Thank you. I’ve corrected people for calling octopus arms tentacles, but when pressed for “what’s the difference?” I’ve always failed to deliver. Been one of those things I’ve always meant to google…
But even with all those arms, a squid or a cuttlefish will still give you ten tickles. 🤭 🤦‍♀️
 
Mm. It looks like the hem of the shirt has fallen down over it; the fabric is following the contour of the thumb under it and there is a fold in approximately the right place.

Reasons it could be AI: she's really hot.

Reasons I think it's a real girl:

1. moles on her boobs on areas that would actually be exposed to sun e.g near the armpit and on the inner curves
2. her face is asymmetrical:
2.1 eyebrows are pruned and shaped differently, and her left eyebrow is further to the outside of her face than her right one
2.2 her tubercle is off-center of her cupid's bow
2.3 her lower vermillion border is rounder on the left hand side than the right hand side.

these are all such subtle "flaws" that I feel that an AI would not have added them.

regardless, she's gorgeous.
It's strange. I only found one link to a reddit post from a year ago on GIS, and nothing on TinEye.

Her left arm also looks funky, like there is nothing below the hand.
 
A Victorian MP, Georgie Purcell, had a photo of her altered and shown on a national TV news network. Her boobs were increased, and her dress altered to a crop top and a skirt. Channel Nine apologised and said it was an unintended result of “automation by Photoshop”.
Sudden confusion as to how a "Victorian.MP" got anywhere near Photoshop until you realise that is Australia...

I know they had technical advances in the late 1800's... but not that good 😜
 
Bec is quite large, but prefers wearing a crop instead of a bra to keep things under some semblance of control. Which I'm absolutely fine with. :giggle:
Never intended to imply there was anything ‘wrong’ with buxom women. I just prefer those with, um, more manageable asset. 😉
 
Ah yes, tic-toc boobs. Got to love them. Even more fun when you get to rock them back to front.
 
Yeah our eyes are a great argument against ID.

Emily
Their higgledy-piggledy arrangement, however, is actually a pretty good argument for artificially intelligent design, what with all the weird errors and artifacts. ;) 😇
 
Talking of rookie mistakes - I thought a glass of wine might be a useful aid to getting this document done.

I was wrong. Or at least after the second one.
79 pages, 14 figures, 8 tables, and 18k words. I wonder if Laurel would publish it in anti-erotic?

Emily
 
Back
Top