Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Artful's dream said:with respect to killer's comments .. good use of language always works for me ..whereas: YOU=MEANING THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT ARE READING THIS THREAD LOL
To many people in RL BDSM relationships, the word "Master" or "Mistress" is the utmost honorific, a title earned after *much* time and energy has gone into the relationship--if ever. Even then, some (myself included) shy away from such titles, partially because of their connotations of *real* slavery and exploitation, and partly because it suggests a level of submission we do not truly feel. Thus, to see someone use the name "Master" for one a person has only known for a week seems not only misleading, but somewhat trivializing--because it seems to take very lightly something that many of us take more seriously than wedding vows.Originally posted by Artful's dream --I use this post as an example only, not to target the poster
aagrees w/ Master..correct me PLEASE if I'm wrong cym,but we all had to start out somewhere ,did we not? or were you born a submissive?
First, the post is hostile and intentionally provocative. Such things rarely if ever generate useful and intelligent conversation.I came to learn lady..are you qualified to teach me anything besides animosity or hate? damn i think i get enough of that in the real world too tyvm ..100 plus and going strong... hehe for You 1 I cherish above all others>
FdiskIt said:I have found this thread interesting. (For the most part that is)
"Warning my grammaticism is far from perfect, though I take criticism and corrections well."
I am new to the BDSM scene, and I had no idea that there was any difference in online and R/L behaviors. Now I know that there is. My current experience is R/L. The thread could have used a different title sure, but why get into the argument about woulda, shoulda, or coulda. Once you begin to read through the thread you may come to the conclusion that it is an area to post your questions. That is the conclusion that I came to. Once you determine what you think the thread is about you can continue to read and possibly get something from it or you could leave the thread. Not to difficult. Now if something is posted you don't agree with you can give your opinion, and it should then be taken as the opinion of the person placing that post. Not as an attack on the person being replied to. We need to try to keep level heads when reading and replying to these posts. We are all just trying to enjoy our lifestyles in the way we see fit for ourselves. This board allows us to express what we enjoy and learn from what others enjoy, not start fights about it.
Please just open your hearts and accept one another for whom and what you are.
kayte said:
Well enough about that. I have read the posts to this thread a couple of times now. I am very saddened that something dream, started has upset, to the extent that is has, those I have looked to for information. I've not seen attacks like I have here.
Specifically cym's and skye's posts have caused me to re-evaluate where I place them for obtaining reasonable and valid information on D/s relationships in the future.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by cymbidia
I still maintain that there are so many pretenders online that they do more harm than good for the new tender souls going to find information to ease the ache for the something else that's been missing from thier sexuality.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Risia's response:
But, we all also know that the same is true in real life--there are predators and pretenders everywhere. The 'net may allow them to flourish more easily, but it's not an exclusively internet-based problem. We wouldn't suggest that nobody should go to a public fetish event because a psycho might use them as a hunting ground, would we?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by cymbidia
You gotta admit that the huge giant vast majority of online chat room type BDSM is just fantasy and illusion as compared to that which we practice in our day-to-day and skin-to-skin lives. C'mon...you know it's true. Most of the chat room, online BDSM stuff is crap fantasy play that bears precious little resemblence to anything any of us have ever done in a skin-to-skin BDSM relationship.It can be. It has been. It will be again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R's response:
To the extent that a chatroom based connection becomes a real relationship, it seems to me that this is hugely variable--at least the possibilities are wildly divergent. Granted, chatrooms foster silly protocols & surface level conversation. Granted, the 'net fosters anonymity and thus encourages posturing, trolling, and predatory behavior. However, the 'net also allows people without the money to travel and without local access to information--much less like-minded people--to exchange information and make connections.
And those connections between people, those real meetings of mind and emotion which make for meaningful relationships of all kinds, DO develop online and across distance, at least some of the time and for some people. I know this because I consider you one of the most important people in my life, b, and I've never even shaken your hand. If *that* is possible, isn't it at least thinkable that the *emotional* side of a BDSM relationship could actually develop in even an unlikely environment?
I'm not gonna call you an elitist cym--but I'll be honest and tell you that part of the reason I'm *not* calling you one is because you're a friend. You've got a lot of years of incredible live-skin experience with this, love, and much of it had to be kept secret for fear of much worse than embarassment. You have every right and reason to be proud of the strength, self-knowledge, and dedication that took, and takes. And to see all of that devalued and even made trivial by posturing and exploitive half-truths online has got to burn your ass something fierce. I understand why you're so turned off to chatrooms, b, but I also think there's a tendency (and not just in you) to group all online environments into one category. As we RL/lifestylers ought to know better than anyone, labels are destructive and almost never accurate when applied to particular *individuals.*
If you do nothing but post single lines of "Kneel at my feet, slave girl!" and "Yes, Master DarkFyre, oh Lord of my kingdom. Anything to serve Thee..." you aren't going to develop much of a relationship of *any* kind, are you? However, many people spend weeks/months/years exchanging email, having real-time conversations, talking on the phone, and developing something more real. I just hope that we don't lose sight of them, or of those *trying* to connect in real ways.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by cymbidia
But i can't cut them any slack because if i do, they'll move in here and think that this, too, is a fine place in which to play their fantasy games.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R's response:
The danger of accepting and really, truly, honest-to-gods believing generalizations about what "online BDSM is like" is that in doing so, we automatically marginalize people who honestly seek what we have and what we know. They may feel the connection to each other, seek the sensations and the emotion, and be communicating as openly and honestly as possible--but feel as though there's no place for them to develop beyond chatrooms. Onliners trying to learn the "real deal" need somewhere to turn; skin-to-skin people need a place that isn't caught up in "W/we" protocols and other such non-issues that we don't give a damn about; people just getting the fantasy of online need to know there's more out there and that it doesn't look like The Dungeon when there are bodies in proximity to each other.
That's a lot to lose by freezing out onliners. Thus, for us in this forum, it's a real tightrope walk, dealing with online BDSM. This is *most* true, I think, for the moderators. At the end of the day, we're the ones who have to set the guidelines, monitor the conversation, remove the off-topic posts/threads, and take the heat from both sides of EVERY disagreement in the Forum.
So, here's what I think RL players can learn from onliners:
Tolerance, acceptance of diversity, and how to lead gracefully without alienating those we would make our students, proteges, and friends.
RisiaSkye said:Here's what really gets me about my suddenly being viewed as some kind of RL Nazi--I spend a fair amount of time and diplomacy trying to get actual conversation going between Onliners and RL people, rather than foster this kind of pointless animosity. Given the response I've gotten, I feel rather foolish for having bothered.
Whatever. Anyway, this is what I posted (partially *to* cymbidia) in defense of Online BDSM and its participants.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah, the exquisite fucking irony. [/B]
KillerMuffin said:Dream cannot alter the title to the thread. She cannot delete the thread. She cannot delete her own posts. No one can. You say she may have been misleading. The fact was that the thread title is misleading. I believe that the only issue involved with the entire thread title debacle was that some might find it a slap in the face and highly insulting. It wasn't anything to do with Dream's intentions, which were good, just a momentary bit of poor judgement. Like everyone gets.
Threads don't belong to anyone. They don't belong to the threadstarters. They belong to everyone who posts there. You cannot dictate who will answer what and in what way. You can try, but you're only going to insult everyone when you do.
Literotica is anti-censorship. Period. There are a few things you cannot do at this board. Spam, child porn, copyright infringement, etc., however, you get to say anything you want to. The corollary is so does everyone else.
Laurel, the Webmistress, has already considered the issue of Unregistered. Trolls have done far worse on this site than that little rather polite for a troll blip in this thread. She's decided that the benefits people get from being able to post without registering outweighs any discomfort we get from dealing with trolls. Why? It's nothing to create a new fake identity and troll anyway.
Apparently you don't read really read any threads but your own. Risia is not the only person who thinks that cymbidia behaved badly and told her so. To her face. In public. Risia is not the only person who thinks that strictly online BDSM oriented people have something valuable to offer.
I am not the grammar and punctuation police. If I were this thread would be gone already. I have not criticized anyone's punctuation, spelling, or posting habits here and I will not do so. If you read my thread on posting etiquette and decided it was a direct attack against you, then you have a problem all by yourself. I created that thread in a direct effort to help people who come here.
This forum has established mores in posting and they don't match those in the playground. The playground is playful and this forum is more seriously inclined. This is not going to change just because you prefer it otherwise. It was an established community before you got here. Communities don't change to suit newcomers. Newcomers either decide to fit or they don't. If they fit, the community changes in some ways but not in others.
I posted that thread so people like Dream could come here and find something that might help them understand how things are done here. Why? So their posts will be taken seriously. It helps to know the traffic laws before you drive.
I like Dream. If I didn't like her, I wouldn't try to help her by offering a reason as to why this thread was attacked or by posting those damned guidelines. If I didn't like her, I'd want her to never be taken seriously so I can laugh at her. I do not do that. She's a sincere person. She seems to be pretty smart and she's honestly nice to people.
Dream has no BDSM experience, but she has something important. Sincerity. A desire to learn like the rest of us here. This forum was created so people could learn about BDSM and be a part of a community that's oriented to learning about BDSM. It was not created to play out whip me games online. That's what the SRP is for.
I think Dream has a great deal to offer us because she's actually interested in learning about herself and her new sexuality. There is a lot that I can and hope to learn from her.
Not everyone is going to agree with you. Not everyone is going to like you. There will be people who find your arrogance nothing short of insulting. You don't like me, do you? Same principle in action. You either deal with it or you don't. Your choice.
Yes, you've been persecuted on this thread. You've also been provoking to the entire forum. You've made no effort to try to become part of the forum or try to understand the forum. You've simply expected this forum to bend to your whims, wants, and desires with little or no thought given to the others here.
There is an uncomplicated and adult route to dealing with what happened on this thread. It beggars the imagination as to why you didn't take it.
If you have something to say about me, say it to my face. I respect people who are honest, have some integrity, and have the balls to criticize me to my face. I don't respect snideness and backhanded references. It makes you very weak and I don't respect that kind of cowardliness. I may not like it and I will behave badly, but I will respect it.
Despite what I've been accused of (largely behind the scenes, btw) regarding this whole fracas, I have never *once* accused anyone of behaving badly. All I've done is sympathized with both sides and tried to find common, neutral ground from which everyone might get to speak.KillerMuffin said:
Apparently you don't read really read any threads but your own. Risia is not the only person who thinks that cymbidia behaved badly and told her so. To her face. In public. Risia is not the only person who thinks that strictly online BDSM oriented people have something valuable to offer.
Sweetwood said:I cannot believe this thread.
Artful..... my God man you're by my calculation at least 61 years old.... grow up. You ain't got much time left
How can anyone with any intelligence whatsoever attach that kind of importance to L/D internet fuck yourself at the screen type of engagements and even call them relationships?
And I am a man who met his wife on the net and is now very happily married indeed.
The conceited connivance revealed in the posts in this thread are beyond belief. Do you even keep looking at yourself in the mirror in the morning and find a reflection or is it empty? Or do you see the suoer luxury body of your avatar and just make believe?
I am so glad for cym! I raise her flag and Scream with her: GET REAL Y'ALL.
How is that for an attack?
Sweetwood (professional submissive)