AlexBailey
Kinky Tomgurl
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
- Posts
- 9,857
Americans are now looking forward to new expanded maternity services for the poor and homeless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IT'S A PRELIMINARY DRAFT. The issue is the leak, someone did horrific damage to the sacrosanct of the Supreme court. People like you don't care about principle. The last bastion of our constitutional values and legal principles is now wounded. The highest court in the land has been violated, damaged perhaps beyond repair, trust within the court may never rise to the level needed to rule on some of the most controversial issues of our time because of a cancer that found its way into our judiciary. On to court packing and filibuster rules, might as well go for the jugular, make it a free for all, completely ruin our nation. This preemptive hit against the courts is a dangerous precedent and will affect the effectiveness of the how the courts operate in the future.
They don't. Congress can literally pass a law tomorrow that overrides this decision.The idea that the unelected, unaccountable, and lifetime-tenured justices deserve more deference than the other branches of government which directly answer to the people — because no one would care if this was a leak from the White House or from Congress — has no rational basis.
And of course, I have long been in favor of the American people seeing the Court for what it actually is, rather than the Schoolhouse Rock/Aaron Sorkin bullshit that it's a sacred coterie of priests delivering the Word from on high, like you're spouting here. It's as political a body as any other, and Republicans have actually appreciated this fact for decades (the main reason we're at the place we are now). Now we're all going to appreciate it. Too late for those doomed to death by this pending decision, but better too late than never.
Lots of Democrats expected prescedent to continue instead of a court who wipes their ass with prescrdent.Lots of “sky is falling” comments today and we haven’t even gotten to the God and guns decisions that are coming between now and June.
Yes, the entire planet shouldn't get a say so in how the USA or one of its' states is run.Fetuses aren't infants. Still
You consistently have stated that certain voters should not vote and that certain people should be excluded.
Yes, and I used it correctly, I never conflated a fetus with an infant.Infanticide is the word you used, sparky
Bad precedent is bad precedent. Roe was a crap decision that was cobbled together out of strange ideas found nowhere in the Constitution.Lots of Democrats expected prescedent to continue instead of a court who wipes their ass with prescrdent.
When precedent or even the actual letter of the law isn't what Democrats like they don't give two pumps of rat shit about precedent, so you can just spare us with the pearl clutching act as though it's sacrosanct.Lots of Democrats expected prescedent to continue instead of a court who wipes their ass with prescrdent.
Ok, thanks for confirming that you used the word infant (in the word infanticide) incorrectlyYes, the entire planet shouldn't get a say so in how the USA or one of its' states is run.
Especially when it's being advocated because Democrats don't like how Republicans run states they win.
Yes, and I used it correctly, I never conflated a fetus with an infant.
Learn to read cupcake.
As usual, you have issues with reading. I am not pearl clutching here, dipshit. Just making an observation of others' reactions.When precedent or even the actual letter of the law isn't what Democrats like they don't give two pumps of rat shit about precedent, so you can just spare us with the pearl clutching act as though it's sacrosanct.
Hell if an absolute and unregulatable right to abortion is such a done deal that EVERYONE except alt-reich Nazis support, why don't they just enshrine it as an actual right that shall not be infringed??? Oh that can be infringed on all we want just short of a direct ban too......sucks for abortionist not living in blue states!Bad precedent is bad precedent. Roe was a crap decision that was cobbled together out of strange ideas found nowhere in the Constitution.
Roe could have been unassailable had the court just argued that a woman's reproductive rights are found in the 4th Amendment and that absent reasonable cause to issue a warrant, the government has no authority to intervene in that decision making process EITHER WAY. Without it being a crime, no warrant would issue. The States cannot make it a crime because reproductive rights are within the penumbra of Rights in the 4th and thus can't be decreed "illegal."
If it's a Constitutional Right that means no crime is committed by the exercising of that Right. No crime, no warrant. No warrant, no power for the government to do squat.
Roe was bad precedent because it failed to follow a simple path to victory and instead went off the rails into la la land and that allowed a chink in the armor that could have been avoided from the outset.
I just stated the exact opposite.Ok, thanks for confirming that you used the word infant (in the word infanticide) incorrectly
We don't know if it's an actual draft of anything. We don't know if some lunatic cobbled this together themselves and now claims it's a draft.IT'S A PRELIMINARY DRAFT. The issue is the leak, someone did horrific damage to the sacrosanct of the Supreme court. People like you don't care about principle. The last bastion of our constitutional values and legal principles is now wounded. The highest court in the land has been violated, damaged perhaps beyond repair, trust within the court may never rise to the level needed to rule on some of the most controversial issues of our time because of a cancer that found its way into our judiciary. On to court packing and filibuster rules, might as well go for the jugular, make it a free for all, completely ruin our nation. This preemptive hit against the courts is a dangerous precedent and will affect the effectiveness of the how the courts operate in the future.
As usual, you have issues with reading.
I am not pearl clutching here, dipshit.
Just making an observation of others' reactions.
The word infanticide does not apply to abortion. And since you say you didn't conflate the two, then you obviously recognized and explained your error.I just stated the exact opposite.
You have a serious literacy dysfunction.
So abortion is now racist?It's kinda sad watching the US turn into more of a racially divided, misogynistic third world shit hole.
Yes, I made an observation of people's reactions.Says the guy who keeps picking up the exact opposite of what I say.
You lying to yourself??
Because you're not lying to me "Democrats EXPECTED prescedent to continue instead of a court who wipes their ass with prescrdent." is about the most pearl clutching shit I've seen posted here this year.
You lying to yourself again???
All because Democrats just can't stand diversity. They have to force their views upon all like little psycho totalitarians.It's kinda sad watching the US turn into more of a racially divided, misogynistic third world shit hole.
Yes, I made an observation of people's reactions.
Perhaps you have a different definition of pearl clutching......I don't remember it having to do with descriptive narrative.
In his mind it’s correct. He argues with his own imagination.Ok, thanks for confirming that you used the word infant (in the word infanticide) incorrectly
Lol, two separate entities. But both destroying the moral fibre of your once great country and both equally insidious.So abortion is now racist?
Who knew...
Mostly in California, I'll buy the few around here a bus ticket to Chicago, New York, Denver or anywhere on the west coast... my treat.We're going to see a lot more homeless pregnant women.