phrodeau
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 78,588
As King Lear said, let copulation thrive, for we lack soldiers.We're going to see a lot more homeless pregnant women.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As King Lear said, let copulation thrive, for we lack soldiers.We're going to see a lot more homeless pregnant women.
No, it's just a fact that I used it correctly.In his mind it’s correct. He argues with his own imagination.
My description was nothing of the sort. It was a literal explanation of other people's reaction.And it was overdramatic pearl clutching with an extra huge scoop of hypocrisy on the side.
Nope. Just the usual one where you use descriptive narrative to engage in the overdramatic bullshit.
No.... Democrats are.Americans are now looking forward to new expanded maternity services for the poor and homeless.
Mostly in California, I'll buy the few around here a bus ticket to Chicago, New York, Denver or anywhere on the west coast... my treat.
My description was nothing of the sort.
It was a literal explanation of other people's reaction.
So you're ascribing other people's behavior onto me. Got itIt was absolute drama and hypocrisy.
Pearl clutching at its finest.
No, it was a churched up bullshit "explanation" to try an polish the turd that is the Democrat hissy fit about the possiblity they might not get their way in places they lost the democracy game via their favorite piece of overtly partisan judicial activism.
That's the 'right' way isn't it? Just make your troubles go 'away'.
I'm surprised you don't consider abortion to be a sacrament.
My description was nothing of the sort. It was a literal explanation of other people's reaction.
So you're ascribing other people's behavior onto me. Got it
Looks like you forgot your meds this morning
Yes, the prescedent was Roe. And many Democrats believed that prescedent would stand.No, it's your bullshit explanation and laughable that you tried to portray Democrats as standing on precedent.... something even you know Democrats don't give any fucks about.
LOL... and that's why it was pearl clutching.
Someone get this comrade a fainting couch!!!
Yes, the prescedent was Roe. And many Democrats believed that prescedent would stand.
Kavanaugh even said it was. One might argue whether it was good or bad, but not whether it was.
I was not giving an opinion on the ruling, dipshit...
I was describing what I have seen today from many Democrats.
You don't even know what the fuck you're saying anymore.... seriously just in overdrive victory lap mode.
Absolutely dismiss someone who is off their rocker and not even addressing anything I say properly.It's spelled precedent.
And why? Democrats dismiss precedent all the time when it's not convenient for them.
Why would they expect the right to show them respect that they dismiss for others???
The entitlement and snobbery the D'eez are displaying over this is "cocaine fueled orgy" level amazing.
SO WHAT?
Since when was precedent anything but an obstacle between Democrats and the power to force their views upon others who have rejected them??
Why should we treat you any differently??
I didn't say you were, learn to read you illiterate (D)ipshit.
A bunch of pearl clutching, entitlement and hypocrisy.... yes. I agree that's what many Democrats are doing.
Ascription and dismissal......time to tuck that tale and start running while you name call.
You don't have any other option.
Absolutely dismiss someone who is off their rocker and not even addressing anything I say properly.
The level of self contradiction here is matched only by the lack of self awareness.I don't have a problem with the ruling. I disagree with it and will lobby and vote accordingly.
Fuck off
Cried the psychotically authoritarian socialist against democracy in action.... LOLConservatives make strides in securing their freedom to control the lives of other Americans.
That would be because you make up what I think rather than looking at my actual words which describe what I think.The level of self contradiction here is matched only by the lack of self awareness.
Mostly because changing the Constitution is so obscenely difficult that we as a nation always pull end runs around it. I could name any number of issues but lets use one I think we can agree on. The Assault Weapons ban was unconstitutional, so is not allowing people to carry butterfly or switch blades. Nobody REALLY cared enough to drive it to the SCOTUS but anybody with a passing knowledge of the Constitution knows what happened.Hell if an absolute and unregulatable right to abortion is such a done deal that EVERYONE except alt-reich Nazis support, why don't they just enshrine it as an actual right that shall not be infringed??? Oh that can be infringed on all we want just short of a direct ban too......sucks for abortionist not living in blue states!
Cried the psychotically authoritarian socialist against democracy in action.... LOLConservatives make strides in securing their freedom to control the lives of other Americans.
That would be because you make up what I think rather than looking at my actual words which describe what I think.
I don't have a problem with the ruling. I disagree with it and will lobby and vote accordingly.
Fuck off
Tl;Dr - you're a douche who really doesn't have anything to sayCried the psychotically authoritarian socialist against democracy in action.... LOL
They're just going to regulate it the same way progressive democrats regulate literally everything else.
You didn't think your golden calf was actually totally invulnerable as you ran around goring everyone else's just to be assholes and get a good laugh did you??
Not at all, your self contradiction is quoted right here..... you're still so unaware you still don't see it do you??
If you didn't have a problem with the ruling you wouldn't lobby or vote accordingly...i. e. take action against it.
Taking action against something proves you in fact have a problem with it.
Cried the psychotically authoritarian socialist against democracy in action.... LOL
They're just going to regulate it the same way you want every other civil right regulated.... to the extreme.
Mostly because changing the Constitution is so obscenely difficult that we as a nation always pull end runs around it.
I could name any number of issues but lets use one I think we can agree on. The Assault Weapons ban was unconstitutional, so is not allowing people to carry butterfly or switch blades. Nobody REALLY cared enough to drive it to the SCOTUS but anybody with a passing knowledge of the Constitution knows what happened.
People do a lot of "This isn't in the Constitution" neither is the right to marry, have kids, go hunting. I could drone on and on. Lots of things that aren't in the Constitution aren't there because the FF more or less agreed that certain things are so basic that if the government was taking the rights away they had long since overstepped any logical standard of being abusive.
Can you imagine how insane it would sound to the FF that you need permission to fucking hunt can only kill so many during specific periods of time?
Those 75+ shitposts a day aren't going to write themselves if he has to put some actual thought into them.Seriously you don't even stop for two seconds in between tirades to put any actual thought into what you say.